Channel
@docsdegendiary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
310subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001573174781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @docsdegendiary |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/docsdegendiary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 310 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 312 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 319 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 322 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 322 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2025 to 4 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bought this 趙長鵬 on #BNB Chain. The first ever $趙長鵬 (Changpeng Zhao) ticker on $BNB. In honor of the great man CZ! X Community: https://x.com/i/communities/1974460979430707581 Narrative: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Changpeng_Zhao Chart: https://four.meme/token/0x15ad8cb381e25292dc95c6f4480a628c102a4444
❤1
Gamble aped into $ETH-CHAN sub 300k👀 Just launched , inspired by Shiro, the visionary artist behind ETHCHAN and her dream of $ETH reaching $10K. Good narrative, team seems to push, If cards played right this could be something https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xd89cc51f5dcceb26f6977d3b172a0d26b5771124?t=1753038856001
$NOOT outperformed during the market dip this year, followed by a well-earned breather in the accumulation zone for a few months, but now.. @nootonabstract is waking up again! Second leg about to rip! NOOT NOOT!! 🐧
$PERATE launching soon ETH Mission: – Raid Epstein Island x.com/peratemap – Leak the files – Share the treasure t.me/peratemap – Meme to Valhalla
The #1 meme on @AbstractChain, $ABSTER is still only $30M. ATHs from other chain mascots: •Brett: $2.2B •Bonk: $5B •Trondog: $370M •Lofi: $250M @Phin_totten says an aggressive marketing push is about to begin for @AbstractChain Wdy think will happen when the world notices?🧠
Gamble aped a decent bag into $GOO on Abstract Some good names are following the X account. Narrative looks good and teams seems to push in a smart way https://dexscreener.com/abstract/0x097d835868759c354fa341b03cdf3aa7af6c2a9d
GM! ☕️ $POLLY new day, new ATH. I hope y’all did your homework and secured that bag.🧠 Hubby #PENGU - 792M💙 Wifey #POLLY - 7.9M 💖 We’re entering a range that PENGU whales watch closely. If you know, you know! HIGHER!
GM Champs!☕️ $ABSTER is my high-conviction meme and for good reason. Just hit a new ATH again. 🎯 ATHs from other chain mascots: •Brett (Base): $2.2B •Bonk (Solana): $5B •Trondog (Tron): $370M •Lofi (SUI): $250M Now, $ABSTER is only at 23M. What do the numbers say?🧠
Regarding the Pokemon Meta on #SUI there shouldn't be a better fit than $PCHU - @PonzichuOnSui representing it Every trade auto-buys and burns 2% of $PCHU, making it forever deflationary. It recently joined the Loyalty program on @giverep encouraging community-driven promotion. I see this having the ingrediënts in going higher - slow cook IMO https://dexscreener.com/sui/0x8be4b4c75f609b77af241996088f941c54232e21f3…
Gamble aped into $SPRING on Abstract Chain, it's one of the 4 stars of the new Lil Pudgy show on YouTube starting soon! If the team is eager to push this could be a nice slow-mooner 92k mc https://dexscreener.com/abstract/0x0b3c870cadc24676a8632ff9bed4aa827fac1de0
$MAGI swam all the way from 38k to a 240k ATH💧
Gambled into the just launched Magikarp $MAGI on SUI due the SUI x Pokemon rumors. Very low cap at 38k - idk the team but the narrative is nice, so lets see: https://dexscreener.com/sui/0xc5602b1df8ae716a0ed52e00fe69e632cd405a8d785de8039d77f468cd8b7420
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @docsdegendiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@docsdegendiary named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doc’s Degen Diary” (@docsdegendiary), 310 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/docsdegendiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.