Channel
@docprosvet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
842subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001822611520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @docprosvet |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/docprosvet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 842 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 840 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (25 June 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 220 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
228 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 113 | 49.6% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 12.3% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 11.0% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 7.02% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 6.58% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 6.58% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 3.95% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 2.19% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💫Много раз у меня спрашивали, есть ли/будет прием на выходных, чтобы добраться из города работающим пятидневку- ловите ! Две субботы подряд 5 и 12 сентября принимаю в Никольском (ул Школьная 2Б) Для записи звоните в рабочие часы клиники 8-20:00 по номеру +7(965) 762-62-04 Что-то похожее на лето закончилось , но оставим место не грусти , а чему-то новому впереди ✨ До встречи на приемах и онлайн-консультациях
🥰14❤2
Почему растет частота рака яичников? Рост заболеваемости раком яичников в мире (особенно в развивающихся странах и России) связан не с одной причиной, а с комплексным изменением репродуктивного поведения, образа жизни и экологии. Вот ключевые факторы этого роста: ✏️Изменение репродуктивного поведения в последние десятилетия(главный фактор), приводящей к увеличению циклов с овуляцией: Каждый дополнительный год с ову…
🙏12❤1
Возвращаюсь с классной встречи с реабилитологами и урологами , обсуждали многоликий симптом жжения ⚡️ Симптом один, а состояний , которые приводят к нему, много, и редко, когда это классический цистит. Делились своими клиническими случаями, когда стандартный подход и терапия не работают, что можно пробовать новое, и попытались четче выстроить, на каком этапе с какими инструментами каждый смежный специалист подключае…
❤10🔥4
Бесстрашные женщины У меня была та неделя урожайной на таких пациентов. В пункте предохранения часть женщин в сторону ближе к 50 (еще с месячными) отвечали: нет, никак не предохраняемся. - Правильно я понимаю, беременность не планируете? - Нет, конечно, внуков ждем. - Даже так не предохраняетесь?(любимый большинством прерванный половой акт, который часто предохранением не называют) - Даже так. Уже ведь возраст , ша…
😁15👌2
ВПЧ и мужчины Еще одни важные новости с канадского конгресса подробно записала голосом ⤴️ ВПЧ не проблема только женщины, и вести с положительным результатом на ВПЧ корректнее не одну женщину , а пару✔️
❤11
Voice message, posted without a caption
🔥6
Открывается дверь в кабинет , и первая сегодняшняя пациентка заходит с презентом и поздравлением. Сижу в шоке. Откуда Вы знаете?? — Ну вот, знаю. И тут я вспоминаю, что сегодня не только 10-летняя годовщина нашей семьи , но еще и день гинеколога 😀 Благодарна каждой из вас за доверие, за то что решаетесь прийти, даже когда почти не остается надежды на то, что кто-то поможет, возвращаетесь, приезжаете из любых точек…
❤36🥰11👍2
Новая инфекция? Записала для вас короткий подкаст ⤴️ по интересной новости с международного конгресса по заболеваниям вульвы и влагалища, который сейчас проходит в Канаде. Чуть позже ещё поделюсь не менее интересной поднятой там темой в отношении обследования на ВПЧ партнеров 🙌🏻
🔥9👍2
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍5❤3
Ботокс не только для лица: новое слово в лечении женской боли Вестибулодиния — хроническая боль в преддверии влагалища, которая делает интимную близость, использование тампонов и даже обычное сидение невыносимыми. Многие годами не получают эффективной помощи, считая это своей особенностью. Как ботокс может помочь? Одна из ключевых причин боли — патологическое напряжение (гипертонус) мышц тазового дна. Ботулотоксин…
❤8👏2
Сегодня на конференции по теме ОнкоКлимакса Часто женщины , прошедшие путь гинекологического рака при удалении яичников, получении лучевой или химиотерапии или при получении соответствующей лекарственной терапии в довольно молодом возрасте резко теряют эстрогены, которые вырабатывали яичники, что глобально отражается на качестве жизни. Пройдя лечение по основному заболеванию, закончив плотную работу с онкологом, …
❤17🔥6
Video message, posted without a caption
😍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @docprosvet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гинеколог обнимает🤍Щирова” (@docprosvet), 842 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/docprosvet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.