Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бета-ридер | Дочь редактора

@doch_redaktora

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002759309587
TypeChannel
Username@doch_redaktora
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/doch_redaktora

Growth

9910 Aug 2026, 09:31 — 99 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:23 — 99 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:3110 Aug 2026, 20:23
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:2399no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:3199first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

606 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21335.1%
🤓7211.9%
❤‍🔥6110.1%
🔥538.75%
457.43%
👍406.60%
😁315.12%
🎄223.63%
👏213.47%
🥰132.15%
🦄91.49%
🤣81.32%
💘50.825%
🤩40.66%
🤔30.495%
👀20.33%
💯20.33%
🕊20.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 606reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC168 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Итак, вопрос был такой: использование прилагательных в тексте, когда это оправдано, а когда уже избыток? Если у вас при каждом существительном по прилагательному – уже избыток, а если больше, чем по одному, то сами понимаете. Вот, например: В мозолистых руках сутулая девушка держала грязную чугунную сковороду, на которой все еще шипело горячее масло от пахучей жареной картошки. Если больше двух прилагательных при о

🔥1398🤓7🥰2

9 Jun 2026, 09:34 UTC102 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Тааак. Я жива, хотя это так не выглядит. Я обещала пост про КАКи, но в коммах попросили поговорить про прилагательные, и про них как-то быстрее (за полтора месяца, ахаха) написалось, поэтому сегодня будет длиннопост про них, а про КАКи на следующей неделе постараюсь.

9👏5❤‍🔥4🥰2

22 Apr 2026, 12:19 UTC233 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вася открыл для Кати дверь машины, а, когда она устроилась на переднем сиденье, захлопнул ее, обошел машину спереди и открыл дверь водительского сиденья. Сел и завел машину. Та сорвалась с места и помчалась в сторону центра. Или вот еще: Она открыла холодильник, взяла молоко и закрыла холодильник. Налила белую жидкость в хлопья и вернулась к холодильнику, чтобы поставить бутылку обратно. Закрыв дверцу, она с отвраще

13👍8🤓7❤‍🔥3💯21🔥1

21 Apr 2026, 15:04 UTC167 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Добавь в опрос слово "бесит" и угадай, какой вариант наберет больше голосов😏 Понял, принял. Расскажу, что меня бесит. Завтра. Наверное. Про остальное тоже расскажу, а еще в комментах поступило сразу несколько интересных запросов, включая подушнить на прилагательные, а это дело святое😈 В общем, будет интересно 🤓 P.S. На картинке олицетворение состояния "когда меня бесят". Но вы же и так поняли, да?

12❤‍🔥10👏9👍5🤓3🦄2

20 Apr 2026, 09:07 UTC141 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

О чем написать?

  1. НЕСМОТРЯ или НЕ СМОТРЯ5%
  2. запятая перед КАК31%
  3. ЧТО-ТО vs ЧТО-НИБУДЬ5%
  4. то, что часто встречается в современных книгах и бесит меня59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11🦄7🤓6❤‍🔥2🥰1

20 Apr 2026, 09:07 UTC137 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Новые подписчики (приветики!) пробудили мою совесть, но это не точно. Хожу теперь и думаю, чего б такого написать полезного. У меня есть несколько запросов еще со времен основания канала, а есть пара новых идей, но ведь это ж надо выбрать, сесть и пальцами в клавиатуру тык-тык сделать. Давайте вы тоже повыбираете в опросе ниже, а? А если у вас есть предложения или пожелания, пишите в комменты🤓 #опрос

14❤‍🔥8🥰3🤓1

19 Mar 2026, 13:38 UTC204 views42 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Иногда на меня нападает ступор и мне сложно перефразировать какое-то предложение. Тогда я иду искать примеры употребления слов из него. Для вдохновения, так сказать. Но на днях вдохновения не вышло, только порцию кринжа получила. Спешу поделиться ей с вами, ибо почему я одна должна страдать? В моей фразе было выражение "натянутый как струна", и вот что выдала мне Карта слов: Нервы, как натянутые струны, реагирова

😁1311🤣8🤓7❤‍🔥1🕊1🤩1

10 Mar 2026, 13:48 UTC190 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Авторы, которые со мной работали, знают, как сильно я душню на "то, что", но ТАКОГО❤️ я еще не встречала. И надеюсь, не встречу. А вы говорите "то что"? Ноль осуждения, если что. Фотка из книги "В начале было кофе" С.Гурьяновой

🤓11108🤔3❤‍🔥1🔥1

3 Mar 2026, 12:47 UTC247 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

СЛЕЗЫ ЦВЕТКА Каталина Штурман Исторический роман С чего начинается: Клития лежит и болеет. Есть: 💀 Мрачная комната 🛌 Умирающая девочка 💔 Безысходность ЧИТАТЬ РАЗБОР Книга и автор тут #начало_актив

11🤓6💘52👀2

26 Feb 2026, 10:02 UTC231 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ЯНТАРЬ И ЛАЗУРИТ Чайный Лис Фэнтези С чего начинается: Все рухнуло, все умерли. Есть: 🔥 Огонь ⚡️ Разрушение 🦊 Лисы ЧИТАТЬ РАЗБОР Книга тут #начало_актив

13❤‍🔥9🤓5🔥31👍1👏1

29 Jan 2026, 08:32 UTC231 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ОХОТНИК ЗА СНОВИДЕНИЯМИ Елена Таволга Городское фэнтези С чего начинается: Дженни бредет по переулку и вспоминает прошлое. Есть: 🌨 Снежок 🥶 Холод 🥺 Жизнь-боль ЧИТАТЬ РАЗБОР Книга и автор тут #начало_актив

147🤓6🥰1

26 Jan 2026, 10:19 UTC183 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

НЕЧЕСТИВЫЕ Ellen May Doe Триллер, BL С чего начинается: С допросов. Есть: 📝 Детали 👮‍♀ Офицер 👩 Свидетель ЧИТАТЬ РАЗБОР Читать книгу: 💚Ваттпад 8️⃣Фикбук #начало_актив

12🔥11🤓6❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @doch_redaktora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Apr 2026, 09:07 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

О чем написать?

  1. НЕСМОТРЯ или НЕ СМОТРЯ5%
  2. запятая перед КАК31%
  3. ЧТО-ТО vs ЧТО-НИБУДЬ5%
  4. то, что часто встречается в современных книгах и бесит меня59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Dec 2025, 09:19 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Звините, дуболь два😅 Что вы предпочитаете? (теперь точно можно выбрать многа, правда-правда)

  1. сказал (говорю, говорит)86%
  2. спросил (спрашиваю, спрашивает)81%
  3. произнес (произношу)62%
  4. поведал8%
  5. проговорил49%
  6. поинтересовался (интересуюсь)57%
  7. полюбопытствовал (любопытствую)22%
  8. выплюнул30%

The shares total 395%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 9 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 840,551 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бета-ридер | Дочь редактора” (@doch_redaktora), 99 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doch_redaktora.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.