Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психотерапевт Сафонова Наталья

Channel

Психотерапевт Сафонова Наталья

@doc_nsafonova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

997subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001509880247
TypeChannel
Username@doc_nsafonova
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/doc_nsafonova

Growth

9971,0019997 August 2026 — 1,000 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,000 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,001 subscribers16 August 2026 — 998 subscribers23 August 2026 — 997 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 996–1,002 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 08:48997-1
16 Aug 2026, 18:47998-3
13 Aug 2026, 04:351,001+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:341,000no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:021,000first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 997 subscribers
Avg views / post
138
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total413
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9435.1%
👍9033.6%
🔥5319.8%
👏114.10%
😱51.87%
🤔51.87%
💯41.49%
🥰41.49%
🤷‍♂20.746%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doc_nsafonova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC85 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Говоря об усталости, конечно же нельзя не вспомнить и про родительство:) Ребенок/дети - потенциальный источник переутомления.. Насколько это актуально для вас? Поделитесь, пожалуйста, в комментариях..

5🔥3

Signed Наталья Сафонова

3 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC150 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему мы устаем? Очень часто на приеме я слышу эту фразу: «Доктор, у меня так мало сил. Наверное, мне не хватает каких-нибудь витаминов?» Нам хочется найти одну причину и одно решение(но к сожалению, наш организм устроен сложнее) Усталость - симптом, который может возникать по десяткам разных причин... Часто причиной усталости оказываются нарушения сна, тревога, депрессия, хронический стресс, хроническая перегру

12🔥1

Signed Наталья Сафонова

31 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC178 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжим про источники усталости.. Ответственность и усталость в вашей ситуации связаны, как вам кажется? :)

7👍5👏3🥰2💯1

Signed Наталья Сафонова

27 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC266 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как думаете, поможет снизить усталость, сберечь силы и ресурсы, если не делать, то что не является важным для нас? :)

🔥10👍5🤷‍♂21

Signed Наталья Сафонова

24 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC263 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Надеюсь, что высыпаться стало легче..) Ну а мы с вами продолжим разбор причин усталости в следующих постах.. :)

7🔥2

Signed Наталья Сафонова

21 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC280 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ДЕНЬ 5. «Здоровый сон» За эти дни мы уже говорили о вечернем замедлении, роли света, ночных пробуждениях и небольших привычках, которые помогают нервной системе подготовиться ко сну. Сегодня предлагаю обратить внимание на ещё одну важную вещь. Усталость и сонливость - это не одно и то же. Многие говорят: «Я очень устал(а). Наверное, мне просто нужно поспать.» Но с точки зрения физиологии это разные состояния. С

👍9🔥1

Signed Наталья Сафонова

16 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC257 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

7🔥4

Signed Наталья Сафонова

14 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC253 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ДЕНЬ 3. Почему мы просыпаемся ночью? За первые дни практикума мы уже сделали важные шаги: уменьшили вечернюю стимуляцию, начали больше замечать свое состояние и уделять внимание подготовке ко сну. Это не дает мгновенного результата, но именно так нервная система постепенно выходит из режима постоянного напряжения. Ночные пробуждения — не всегда признак болезни. Наш сон состоит из циклов, и ближе к утру он становится

👍9🔥1

Signed Наталья Сафонова

12 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC263 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

День 2. «Здоровый сон» Если вы постоянно просыпаетесь уставшими, трудно концентрируетесь, быстро раздражаетесь или к вечеру чувствуете истощение, это не нормально, хотя многие так живут годами:) Напомню, что во время сна мозг продолжает активно работать, но в другом режиме: обрабатывает информацию, закрепляет и фильтрует факты и воспоминания, восстанавливает внимание и помогает нервной системе снизить уровень напря

👍5🔥5

Signed Наталья Сафонова

11 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC244 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Добро пожаловать на практикум (слово марафон наверное тут неуместно:)) «Здоровый сон». Ближайшие дни будут посвящены не только информации, но и небольшим шагам, которые помогут нервной системе легче переходить в режим отдыха. Почему вечером сложно уснуть? Частая причина: не отсутствие усталости, а сохраняющаяся активация нервной системы. За день мозг обрабатывает огромный объём информации. Новости, мессенджеры,

🔥116👍4

Signed Наталья Сафонова

10 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC247 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Я сплю всю ночь, но просыпаюсь без сил». Почему так происходит? Количество сна — не единственное, что определяет, насколько хорошо восстановится организм. Важно и "качество сна". Если сон часто прерывается, долго не удается заснуть, есть ранние пробуждения или нарушения дыхания во сне, мозг и организм могут не получать достаточного восстановления. Недостаток качественного сна влияет не только на ощущение усталос

11🔥2

Signed Наталья Сафонова

8 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC236 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Судя по реакциям : усталость - актуальная тема:) Усталость- конечно же симптом "чего угодно", сигнал, который важно не проигнорировать, а разобраться, о чем он говорит. ..«я постоянно устаю» за этой фразой могут скрываться совершенно разные состояния. Например: • тревожные или депрессивные расстройства; • нарушения сна; • железодефицит и анемия; • заболевания щитовидной железы; • перименопауза и менопауза; • нераци

🔥3

Signed Наталья Сафонова

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @doc_nsafonova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTCAnonymous Poll47 voters

Как вы сейчас?

  1. Полно сил! :)15%
  2. Уже устал(а)38%
  3. Фифти-фифти:)40%
  4. Ваш ответ6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,139,504 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психотерапевт Сафонова Наталья” (@doc_nsafonova), 997 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doc_nsafonova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.