Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
53 measurements spanning 83 days, net +78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,713–15,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Oct 2026, 20:46
15,075
+104
28 Oct 2026, 17:59
14,971
+75
27 Oct 2026, 20:39
14,896
+11
26 Oct 2026, 17:04
14,885
-5
25 Oct 2026, 19:39
14,890
-17
24 Oct 2026, 18:38
14,907
-4
23 Oct 2026, 22:00
14,911
-3
22 Oct 2026, 23:40
14,914
-12
22 Oct 2026, 00:16
14,926
-9
20 Oct 2026, 18:07
14,935
-14
19 Oct 2026, 19:10
14,949
-7
18 Oct 2026, 16:59
14,956
+12
17 Oct 2026, 18:36
14,944
+96
16 Oct 2026, 15:46
14,848
+6
15 Oct 2026, 16:55
14,842
-7
14 Oct 2026, 16:48
14,849
-14
13 Oct 2026, 07:45
14,863
-28
9 Oct 2026, 05:18
14,891
-34
4 Oct 2026, 16:01
14,925
-46
26 Sept 2026, 13:57
14,971
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 59 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,143 reactions across 50 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
478
41.8%
👍
293
25.6%
🔥
249
21.8%
👏
67
5.86%
🥰
24
2.10%
🤝
9
0.787%
❤🔥
8
0.7%
😍
5
0.437%
🤯
5
0.437%
👌
2
0.175%
💘
2
0.175%
🤬
1
0.087%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 59 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doc_antonova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Состав врачебного протокола: что важнее – ваш образ жизни или работа врача? Можно ли жить не задумываясь, просто регулярно делая косметологические процедуры?
Врач-дерматолог — это ваш проводник в мир здоровья кожи. Я основываю свои рекомендации на научных данных, клиническом опыте и индивидуальных особенностях каждого пациента. Я могу предложить эффективные процедуры, назначить необходимые анализы и подобрать лечени…
Сегодня последний день лета
И как бы грустно не было, хочется настроить вас на позитивную осеннюю волну и рассказать о том, какие процедуры осенью станут лучшим решением.
Для начала — все что касается аппарата М22 в косметологии выходит на первый план. Это и фототерапия, и лечение пигментации и купероза, и удаление сосудов, и стимуляция выработки собственного коллагена. Аппарат действительно многофункциональный и д…
ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ НА ГОЛОВЕ
📨 Получено сообщение!
Здравствуйте! А вы удаляйте неусы на голове,за ухом? И чем? Никак не могу решиться. И насколько длительная эта процедура? Заранее спасибо.
Конечно удаляем! И вот фото до/после (сразу де после удаления) сверху как раз похожий случай удаления за ухом.
Для опытного специалиста эта процедура никак не отличается от обычного удаления, по времени в том числе. Сначала мы как …
РЕАЛЬНЫЙ КЕЙС УДАЛЕНИЯ
Поделюсь с вами отзывом пациентки, которая как раз пришла на удаление папиллом зонами.
Что важно?
Разобрались со всем быстро
Удаление прошло безболезненно
А главное — пациент доволен, а я — тем более 🤍
Кстати, на понедельник у меня освободилось два окошка (следующее свободное окошко аж через неделю).
Есть возможность порадовать себя прекрасным отражением в зеркале перед учебным годом
Зап…
Может ли клиника гарантировать отсутствие рецидива папиллом после удаления?
Выше я рассказывала вам про удаление папиллом зонами и конечно у многих возник вопрос: если удаление зонами такое эффективное, можете ли вы гарантировать что папилломы никогда не появятся вновь?
Ответ однозначен: ни одна клиника не может дать такой гарантии. Папилломы вызваны вирусом папилломы человека (ВПЧ), и у каждого пациента есть своя …
Я УДАЛИЛ ДВЕ, А ПОЯВИЛОСЬ ПЯТЬ
Сегодня на приеме обсуждали с пациентом его предыдущий опыт удаления папиллом.
С его разрешения, расскажу вам подробнее:
«Я долгое время уже мучаюсь с папилломами, особенно на шее. Удалял две, появлялось 5. И так до бесконечности»
Папилломы это не просто «пупырышки» на коже. Папилломы это вирус, с которым нужно бороться комплексно
Именно поэтому мы ввели удаления зонами. Чтобы таки…
«Если родинка не болит — значит, она безопасная».
Так ли это? ❌
Это один из самых опасных мифов о родинках!
Отсутствие боли НЕ означает безопасность образования.
Почему это миф:
🔍 Меланома на ранних стадиях чаще всего безболезненна
🔍 Боль появляется только при глубоком прорастании опухоли
🔍 90% злокачественных образований кожи не вызывают дискомфорта
На что действительно обращать внимание (правило ABCDE):
A -…
ОЖЕРЕЛЬЕ КЕРАТОМ НА ШЕЕ
Я вам только недавно рассказывала про множественное удаление кератом и показывала детали на двух зонах: спине и животе
Сегодня покажу, как проходило удаление в зоне декольте — в зоне, за которую боятся также, как за лицо. Оно и понятно — платья с красивым вырезом надевать хочется, а вот кератом, папиллом или шрамов в этой зоне — совсем не хочется😅
🍂 Что бы я делала, если хотела бы подготовить кожу к осени?
Осень — прекрасное время позаботиться о здоровье. Сегодня разберем с какими задачами можно прийти к нам, а о чем обязательно позаботиться дома
Первое — это конечно анализы. После лета очень актуально сдать анализ на
1️⃣ ВПЧ (открытая обувь и бассейны — частые спутники появляющихся бородавок)
2️⃣ самые популярные дефициты, например витамин D, чтобы быть у…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @doc_antonova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Рассказать вам сегодня про удаление атеромы? Могу и показать, если интересно
Да, расскажите43%
И рассказывайте, и показывайте 😁57%
Не интересно1%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Радио 7 на семи холмах @radio7_official · 19,555 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дерматолог Антонова | Дерматологический центр Доктора Антоновой” (@doc_antonova), 15,075 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doc_antonova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.