Channel
@doc_antonova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
14,846subscribers
-151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001663698592 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doc_antonova |
| Description | 🏆 Лучший дерматолог РФ, Москвы по версии ПроДокторов (‘21, ‘22, ‘24, '25) Ольга Александровна Антонова все о родинках и других проблемах кожи Для связи @docantonova_chat 📍 Москва, метро Добрынинская, Люсиновская 53 Doctorantonova.ru/?utm_sourse=tg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doc_antonova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 14,846 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 14,858 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 14,866 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 14,873 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 14,882 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 14,886 | -19 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 14,905 | -17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 14,922 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 14,929 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 14,943 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 14,959 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 14,968 | -21 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 14,989 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 14,997 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 14,997 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (31 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 61,163 |
| Reactions total | 856 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 00:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
856 reactions across 41 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 370 | 43.2% | |
| 👍 | 237 | 27.7% | |
| 🔥 | 150 | 17.5% | |
| 👏 | 62 | 7.24% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 1.87% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 0.701% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 0.584% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.584% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.234% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.234% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.117% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 856reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍂 Что бы я делала, если хотела бы подготовить кожу к осени? Осень — прекрасное время позаботиться о здоровье. Сегодня разберем с какими задачами можно прийти к нам, а о чем обязательно позаботиться дома Первое — это конечно анализы. После лета очень актуально сдать анализ на 1️⃣ ВПЧ (открытая обувь и бассейны — частые спутники появляющихся бородавок) 2️⃣ самые популярные дефициты, например витамин D, чтобы быть у…
❤8
Подробно рассказала и показала здесь ⬆️
🔥20👏8❤3
А вам было бы страшно удалять на лице?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
САМАЯ ЧАСТАЯ ЗОНА для удаления новообразований — лицо Оно и понятно, это заметная и часто травмируемая зона. И удаление именно на лице часто вызывает страхи — а вдруг останется шрам или будет больно.
🔥5❤3
Еще в далеком 2021 году мы ввели удаление зонами. Оно действует для папиллом, кератом и гемангиом: Почему это эффективно? 1️⃣ Минимальный риск рецидива: Методика позволяет полностью удалить патологические клетки, что значительно снижает вероятность повторного появления новообразования. Как в случае с 120 кератомами - если б мы удалили всего 15 - рецидив был бы очень вероятен. 3️⃣ Сохранение здоровой ткани: Удаляе…
👍26❤4🔥3🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
Аппликационная анестезия наносится на всю обрабатываемую зону, а затем отдельные образования «подкалываются» инфильтрационной анестезией
👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
В случае с кератомами и папилломами, по одной их удалять просто неэффективно — они будут появляться снова. А поэтому — лучше проводить подобное удаление зонами. Для пациента в целом ничего не меняется — кроме ускоренного решения проблемы.
🔥2
Posted without readable text
РОГ ИЗ КЕРАТОМЫ 📨 Получено сообщение! Расскажите пожалуйста про рог из кератомы. Спасибо. Кожный рог — разновидность кератомы, когда роговые массы растут вверх, образуя конусовидный вырост. Также требует онконастроженности. Да, чаще всего кератомы - доброкачественные образования, но в 5-10% случаев под кератомы может маскироваться пигментная базалиома, или некоторые пограничные заболевания, такие как актинический…
❤19👍9🤯5👏1
ЕСТЬ ЛИ ВИРУС У МЕНЯ? Здравствуйте! Как узнать, есть ли вирус папилломы человека в организме? Самый легкий и быстрый способ — проверить себя на наличие папиллом и бородавок. Если видите их — значит вирус живет в организме. Однако иногда этот вирус протекает бессимптомно и здесь для точного определения нам поможет ПЦР-тест (сейчас все вспомнили 2020 год и вздрогнули, но я не о таком ПЦР) Это мазок из шейки матки…
❤14👏8👍3🤝2
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @doc_antonova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вам было бы страшно удалять на лице?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как думаете, плоские родинки могут быть опасны (перерождаться в злокачественные)?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как думаете, сколько времени заняло удаление такой атеромы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Рассказать вам сегодня про удаление атеромы? Могу и показать, если интересно
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дерматолог Антонова | Дерматологический центр Доктора Антоновой” (@doc_antonova), 14,846 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doc_antonova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.