2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 370–372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 06:20
371
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:20
371
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
333
Videos
49
Links
486
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
142 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
43
30.3%
👍
35
24.6%
❤🔥
20
14.1%
🔥
20
14.1%
custom 5364035134725043602
3
2.11%
👏
3
2.11%
🤝
3
2.11%
custom 5226928895189598791
2
1.41%
custom 5463071033256848094
2
1.41%
💯
2
1.41%
😍
2
1.41%
🤩
2
1.41%
⚡
1
0.704%
🏆
1
0.704%
👌
1
0.704%
🙏
1
0.704%
🤗
1
0.704%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 18 we hold a reading for · 61%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dobrotorg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 April 2026 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
152
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
135
over 17 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqx9Ec5d
1
27 April 2026
27 April 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 10 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вспоминаем атмосферу Всероссийской конференции «Торги по банкротству 2026»
Собрали все лучшие кадры в один альбом — ищите себя, делитесь фотографиями и отмечайте коллег 😀🙎♂️
📷 СМОТРЕТЬ ФОТО
Выражаем благодарность нашим партнёрам «ОргТорг», «Доброторг» и «ALFALOT», а также информационному партнёру «PROбанкротство» за сотрудничество и поддержку.
ТОП-5 кейсов недели
Мы спросили топов банкротства, что зацепило их на этой неделе и что точно нужно узнать и вам.
🔺 Айжан Мухамбетова из Equal Legal Partners
О кейсе, в котором суд округа превысил свои полномочия, когда при отмене судебных актов фактически установил иные обстоятельства дела.
🔺 Радмила Радзивил из «Правый берег»
О том, как исполнительский иммунитет защищает дарение единственной квартиры.
🔺 Наталья…
🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 Почему суперкар из GTA нельзя выставить на торги, даже если за него готовы заплатить миллион?
В преддверии выхода GTA VI интерес к серии снова бьёт рекорды. Миллионы игроков по всему миру ждут релиз, а обсуждения новой части не утихают ни на день 😠
Представьте, что у вас есть роскошный пентхаус в Vice City 🐪, коллекция редких суперкаров и успешный бизнес в GTA. Если всё это стоит огромных игровых денег, можн…
Кассация освободила банк от возврата денег покупателю с торгов банкрота | PROбанкротство
к.ю.н. Наталья Ершова, генеральный директор ООО «Доброторг», прокомментировала позицию суда округа по делу № А40-213109/2021 о распределении ответственности при расторжении договора купли-продажи имущества, реализованного на банкротных торгах.
📌 Обстоятельства дела
В процедуре банкротства Максима Тырсикова на торгах была реали…
✨ Новый выпуск Costa de Rada с Натальей и Денисом Ершовыми уже опубликован! 🪄
Мы обсудим актуальные темы в области банкротства и торгов с настоящими профессионалами — кандидатами юридических наук. Денис является управляющим партнером и директором СРО «СОТ», а Наталья занимает пост Генерального директора ООО «Доброторг».
Смотрите выпуск там, где удобно 👇
ВК видео: Встреча Натальи и Дениса Ершовых с Радмилой Радзиви…
🎞 Скоро выпуск Costa de Rada! 🎞
Дорогие друзья! Мы рады анонсировать новый выпуск подкаста, у нас в гостях Наталья и Денис Ершовы — профессионалы в области банкротства и торгов, кандидаты юридических наук. Денис — управляющий партнер и директор СРО «СОТ». Наталья занимает пост Генерального директора ООО «Доброторг».
❤️ В этом выпуске мы обсудим:
• Как Наталья и Денис пришли в профессию: осознанный выбор или случ…
Формальные нарушения при регистрации на ЭТП устранимы и не всегда ведут к отмене торгов | PROбанкротство
к.ю.н. Денис Ершов, директор СРО «Союз организаторов торгов», прокомментировал позицию суда округа по делу № А53-44003/2023 о последствиях отказа в регистрации на электронной торговой площадке и пределах оспаривания банкротных торгов.
📌 Обстоятельства дела
В рамках дела о банкротстве Николая Ермакова проводилис…
Хотели бы приобрести актив, который уже приносит деньги? Это именно он!
🔥 ГОТОВЫЙ АРЕНДНЫЙ БИЗНЕС В ЦЕНТРЕ АЧИНСКА
🏢 Объект:
✅ Двухэтажное коммерческое здание (2011 год постройки)
✅ Общая площадь: 475,6 м²
✅ Арендопригодная площадь: 363,1 м²
✅ Свежий ремонт — можно сдавать сразу, без вложений
📍 Локация: центр Ачинска, ул. Гагарина, 8А и 8Г
Оживлённый район, высокий трафик, отличная видимость и транспортная доступн…
Кассация: Победа на банкротных торгах не гарантирует получение актива | PROбанкротство
к.ю.н. Наталья Ершова, генеральный директор ООО «Доброторг», прокомментировала позицию суда округа по делу № А68-6628/2016 о невозможности изменения договора купли-продажи имущества, реализованного на банкротных торгах, после существенного изменения состава актива.
📌 Обстоятельства дела
В процедуре банкротства ООО «Агро-Вита» на…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dobrotorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 725,682 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доброторг | Всё о торгах” (@dobrotorg), 371 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dobrotorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.