Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for dobe4ever FREE

Channel

dobe4ever FREE

@dobe4everFREE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

513subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001223845120
TypeChannel
Username@dobe4everFREE
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dobe4everFREE

Growth

5135175156 August 2026 — 517 subscribers6 August 2026 — 517 subscribers20 August 2026 — 516 subscribers28 August 2026 — 514 subscribers5 September 2026 — 513 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 512–518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 11:20513-1
28 Aug 2026, 07:44514-2
20 Aug 2026, 19:08516-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:32517no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:04517first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7854.2%
👍6041.7%
🔥53.47%
👎10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2024 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC106 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Sorry for the spam, I deleted the last message. Here's the updated link for the new charts with better metrics. I won't spam again, you guys go check it if you're interested and you'll figure it out. Video soon. New link to interactive charts: https://btc-cycles.vercel.app

4👍4

2 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

this is aligning the cycles with the bitcoin halvings instead for the record. tops and bottoms don't align, nothing really aligns here other than the cycles last 4 years. Even tho it would make way more logical sense that the btc price reacted to the halving cycles not the US elections but hey im just looking at the data.

👍2

2 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

probably no one cares but im gonna make another vid about my little election day conspiracy. I just checked my last vids. I made a vid about this in november 2024 predicting the top in september 2025 & the bottom in sept 2026 (next month) based on the election cycle and it was right on the money (so far)

👍5

2 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

look at that. Exact bottom 800 days after elections... So close every time almost exact day. U can do the math for the current cycle which is the red line.

👍4

2 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC119 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Do you guys see what I see or am I crazy right now? Every peak and every bottom of the bitcoin cycle aligns perfectly if we overlay the cycles starting on US election day. The charts start 1 year before election and go for 3 years after election, so thats a full cycle. '0' is election day. BTC shows the same patterns every time at the same time relative to election. It's weird but here we are. Every peak and every va

👍6

9 Feb 2026, 03:18 UTC527 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Also, we're two years away from the halving and more specifically from the US elections which is what has trigged every bull market since bitcoin exists, don't ask me why but you can see the green dildo candle that marked the start of every bull market the exact day of the US election, every time... Just look. Checks out that we could be in for a long consolidation now, but we'll see.

12👍1

9 Feb 2026, 03:15 UTC513 viewsread 6 August 2026

Which could be the top too for all i know, but yeah... Usually the top of the previous cycle acts as the bottom for the next cycle.

9 Feb 2026, 03:14 UTC494 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Sup guys! I've been super lost I know! I just wanted to drop by to say, I hope no one is panic selling the bottom :)

8

24 May 2025, 06:01 UTC885 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

hey guys, hope everyone is good! I haven't been looking at charts for a long time. I know the price moves cause I see youtube notifications from crypto channels I'm still sub but I'm focussed on other stuff so I didnt do any analysis. I'll look into it now that we broke above 100k. I'll be making a vid sometime in the next few days.

14👍11👎1🔥1

23 Jan 2025, 19:54 UTC≈1,170 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😂😂😂😂 WTF LOOK WHAT BRO BOT BROUGHT UP! WHO REMEMBERS THIS?

👍5

11 Dec 2024, 13:51 UTC≈1,210 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Roger Ver & Tucker Carlson recent interview: here Also, Roger's lawyers will use that signature count as part of the pressure to get the Trump administration to drop everything. It'd really be super helpful if you guys can sign and convince more people to sign the open letter at: FreeRogerNow.org

👍4

7 Dec 2024, 11:04 UTC938 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Candles with long wicks up & down with the body right in the middle indicate uncertainty in the market, but in this context, looking at the technicals & also the current situation, geopolitics & financials, my reading is a pattern of continuation. Meaning more consolidation and eventually breakout above 100k. I think those long wicks have shaken a lot of weak players out of the market, to basically clear the path to

11👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dobe4everFREE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“dobe4ever FREE” (@dobe4everFREE), 513 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dobe4everFREE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.