Engagement
14 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.53%
- avg views ÷ 1,406 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 134
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
6 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈40 viewsread 6 August 2026 Forwarded from @geopolitics_primePhoto
💥 New Mexico drags Trump’s DOJ to court over Epstein cover-up
New Mexico is suing the US Injustice Department and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche for allegedly “stonewalling” its criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, The Guardian reported.
💬 The state wants unredacted records that “may be critical to identifying victims, witnesses, and additional criminal conduct at Zorro Ranch.”
Instead,…
6 Aug 2026, 01:56 UTC≈96 viewsread 6 August 2026 The crazies have been set loose. I’m seeing report after report after report of copycats trying to start fires near or in Spokane. The black awakening has arrived.
5 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC≈123 viewsread 6 August 2026 These fires were set on purpose. There’s no doubt in my mind at all. It’s for a data center this time and Spokane is scheduled to become a 15 minute city by 2030 as well. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CEJk8iCMF/?mibextid=wwXIfr
5 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC≈150 viewsread 6 August 2026 The update isn’t good. Patience is wearing thin and people are upset.
5 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC≈153 viewsread 6 August 2026 https://youtu.be/vX9OmdzqmSw?is=bw09F7IdrGElTJXr
5 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈162 viewsread 6 August 2026 I'm not endorsing Rodgers or the NFL but I'm glad he called Fauci and his supporters out. https://www.dailymail.com/sport/nfl/article-16025663/Aaron-Rodgers-goes-scorched-earth-absolute-coward-Anthony-Fauci-makes-blistering-Covid-rant-live-ESPN-Obviously-lab.html
5 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈132 viewsread 6 August 2026 Forwarded from @navigatingtheliesPhoto
Anyone else find it suspicious that these “wildfires” somehow burn hot enough to melt cars and incinerate homes, yet leave the trees and grass surrounding the homes completely unscathed?
Or how the false prophet media rushes to push a convenient scapegoat narrative that pins the fires on a suspected arsonist?
Or that the Spokane community had been actively opposing data-center development? Or that Spokane is projec…
5 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC≈146 viewsread 6 August 2026 https://dontspeaknews.com/2026/08/05/nato-to-double-or-triple-us-nuclear-sharing-warheads-normalize-a-confrontation-which-could-lead-to-thermonuclear-war/
5 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈143 viewsread 6 August 2026 Now do you see why they want to take your guns away? 👆🏻This will be happening in the United States soon enough and their guns won’t matter because most people will just surrender them just like they surrendered to the masking and shots
5 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈160 viewsread 6 August 2026 Canadian authorities have begun arriving at private homes to question and in some cases charge citizens over social media posts written months or even years before the law under which they are now being pursued ever existed.
Under Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government, Bill C-9, formally known as the Combatting Hate Act, received royal assent on June 18 and took effect on July 18.
Within only a few weeks the Justic…
5 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC≈143 viewsread 6 August 2026 It appears that the firefighters have gotten some control (3-5%) of the Spokane Fire Complex but not much as the fires continue to drop burning embers everywhere. https://www.krem.com/article/news/local/wildfire/heres-what-we-know-about-all-fires-currently-burning-across-spokane-county/293-0e1b9863-42b3-4d76-a319-a7b97622dbea
5 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈145 viewsread 6 August 2026 Birds of a feather
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dntspk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 310,038 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Don’t Speak News” (@dntspk), 1,406 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dntspk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
