9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,018–1,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 14:25
1,020
-1
27 Aug 2026, 08:58
1,021
-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:17
1,023
-4
20 Aug 2026, 16:36
1,027
-1
17 Aug 2026, 19:34
1,028
-2
14 Aug 2026, 07:56
1,030
-1
11 Aug 2026, 06:21
1,031
-4
8 Aug 2026, 00:20
1,035
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:55
1,035
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 10 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,355 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5364238991052780199
618
45.6%
custom 5321004660545317606
435
32.1%
custom 5321435810837323225
302
22.3%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2025 to 9 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 5 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dnstWilson. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2025 to 9 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Не буду ходить вокруг да около - пора поговорить по-честному.
Все подобные посты начинаются с одних и тех же слов, но теперь я и на своей шкуре поняла, что чувствовали другие.. Я долго тянула с этим, думала, взвешивала… и всё-таки поняла, что пришло и моё время поставить точку в этой потрясающей истории с ведением династии.
Хочется быть откровенной потому, что эти два года вы были для меня гораздо большим, чем прос…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Вызвать такси до дома, конечно, было лучшей идеей на тот момент — учитывая, что ноги уже работали чисто на автопилоте. Но как только машина тронулась, я понял, что это было ошибкой.. Каждое нажатие на газ водителем давало по мозгам, желудок крутило так, будто внутри устроили драку двое невидимых, а Элла с Катрин еще и решили устроить живой концерт под радио. Орали во всю гл…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Я точно не помню, на каком этапе вечер начал размываться в калейдоскопе музыки и алкоголя, но к этому моменту мои мысли уже были максимально разбавленными.. Народ постепенно рассосался кто куда. Девчонки весь вечер носились между танцполом и баром цепляясь за коктейли. Мы с Нейтом тоже зависали у барной стойки, время от времени выходя на улицу — то ли покурить, то ли просто проветр…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Перед следующим постом показываю вам несколько фоточек ребят из бара, чтобы вы прочувствовали эту атмосферу 🎉
Так же прикрепляю пластинку с этой имбой, для большего погружения! Мне кажется, этот трек просто идеально сюда вписывается, хехе🤩
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @dnstWilson. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@dnstWilson named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@shnaiderdynasty named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Династия Эрдман ☁️” (@dnstWilson), 1,020 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnstWilson.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
