Channel
@dnevnik05
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
556subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001522904860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnevnik05 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnevnik05 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 556 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 555 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 555 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 25 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
74 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 39.2% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 27.0% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 17.6% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 16.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2025 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👆«Скоро, если пожелает Аллах: Книга “Аз-зухд” достопочтенного имама Ахмад ибн Ханбаль аш-Шайбани. (Представляет собой собрание его избранных материалов, выверенных по трём рукописным спискам, а также дополненных обнаруженными нами разрозненными рукописными частями из первоначального текста книги и включающими переданные с иснадом хадисы из её оригинала, извлечённые из различных источников). В передаче его сына — им…
❤7
قريبا ان شاء الله كِتابُ الزُّهْدِ لِلإِمامِ المُبَجَّلِ أحمَدَ بنِ مُحَمَّدِ بنِ حَنْبَلٍ الشَّيْبانيِّ (وَهُوَ مَجموعُ مَا فِي مُنْتَقَاهُ مُحَقَّقًا عَلَى ثَلَاثِ نُسَخٍ خَطِّيَّةٍ، وَمَا أُلْحِقَ بِهِ مِمَّا وَقَفْنَا عَلَيْهِ مِن أَجْزَاءٍ خَطِّيَّةٍ مُتَفَرِّقَةٍ مِن أَصْلِ الكِتَابِ، وَمَا ألُحِقَ بِهِ مِن أَحَادِيثٍ مُسْنَدِةٍ من أصلهِ مُسْتَخْرَجَةٍ مِن المَصَادِرِ) بِرِوايةِ ابنِهِ الإمامِ أبي عَبدِ الرَّ…
❤2
❌ В Саудии видели луну ✅ В Саудии видели месяц ❌ Надо создавать причины, а потом уповать ✅ Надо предпринимать меры, а потом уповать ❌ Уважаемые братья и сестрА ✅ Уважаемые братья и сестры
😁9👍4🔥3❤1
✅ О книге «аль-Мугни»
🔥4👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥5
File, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
☕️
❤10😁4
⬆️ Султан Умейри написал опровержение на фетву Ибн Хаджара аль-Аскаляни, где он дозволил ширк. Об этом была тут🔗 публикация. Ключевые места: 1️⃣ Он не стал юлить, и прямо сказал, что Ибн Хаджар был спрошен о ширке. 2️⃣ Обвинил Ибн Хаджара в том, что он смешал два абсолютно разных вопроса (истигасу и тавассуль) 3️⃣ Хорошо ответил на нападки его в сторону Ибн Таймии. 📌 Ровно то, что я писал тут🔗, он подтвердил. А…
❤8
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
✅ ДОСТОВЕРНЫЙ ИСНАД КАТАДЫ • ат-Табари более 3000 достоверных асаров передал от Катады по одной цепочке, запоминаем: ат-Табари от Бишра ибн Му’аза от Язида ибн Зурай’а от Саида ибн Аби ‘Арубы от Катады بشر بن معاذ — يزيد بن زريع — سعيد بن أبي عروبة — قتادة بن دعامة 📌 Выглядит это так: حدَّثنا بشرٌ ، قال : ثنا يزيدُ ، قال : ثنا سعيدٌ ، عن قتادةَ ☕️ Теперь вы можете избавить себя от поиска хукма 3000 асарам толь…
👍12❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dnevnik05. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@dnevnik05” (@dnevnik05), 556 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnevnik05.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.