Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ᥴыρ᧐ᥴᴛь

@dmpness

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

172subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004440187334
TypeChannel
Username@dmpness
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 22 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dmpness

Growth

172173172.58 Aug 2026, 18:53 — 173 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:00 — 173 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:03 — 172 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:538 Aug 2026, 23:03
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:03172-1
8 Aug 2026, 19:00173no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:53173first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
231.7%
avg views ÷ 172 subscribers
Avg views / post
398
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total7,969
Reactions total966
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

966 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 539090774866373247316617.2%
custom 536168527221808449816316.9%
custom 539112077474664386515916.5%
custom 531024291990554032015415.9%
custom 539114565549218911413514.0%
custom 536185018178238153410210.6%
custom 5361638830736710986879.01%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 966reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmpness. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я босс отписок

custom 53616388307367109861

8 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mewWkmLovveE

репостните и попросите написать про вас

7 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC144 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53911207747466438653custom 53102429199055403201custom 53616388307367109861

7 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC155 views83 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨🔤ꫀꪝ ℘᥆ઽt | fr᥆ꪑ dꪋꪑ℘nꫀઽઽ 🔥ꫀꪑ᥆᧒ꪱ ꪝiтꫝ :: ꪋкирꪋ | ч/б . . . 🤩🤩🤩🎀🤩🤩🪦🤩🤩 b᥆᥆ઽꫂ ꪋꪀ᥆ꪀ rꫀqꫀઽtઽ | click here

custom 531024291990554032027custom 539090774866373247317custom 536185018178238153414custom 53616388307367109867custom 53616852722180844987custom 53911207747466438656custom 53911456554921891145

5 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC185 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53616388307367109861custom 53911207747466438651custom 53911456554921891141

5 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC296 views133 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨🔤ꫀꪝ ℘᥆ઽt | fr᥆ꪑ dꪋꪑ℘nꫀઽઽ 🔥ꫀꪑ᥆᧒ꪱ ꪝiтꫝ :: Dk | ч/б . . . 🤩🤩🤩🎀🤩🤩🪦🤩🤩 b᥆᥆ઽꫂ ꪋꪀ᥆ꪀ rꫀqꫀઽtઽ | click here

custom 539112077474664386544custom 539090774866373247337custom 539114565549218911429custom 53616852722180844988custom 53102429199055403205custom 53616388307367109865custom 53618501817823815345

31 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC434 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53618501817823815345custom 53911456554921891143custom 53911207747466438652custom 53616388307367109861custom 53909077486637324731

31 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC587 views149 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨🔤ꫀꪝ ℘᥆ઽt | fr᥆ꪑ dꪋꪑ℘nꫀઽઽ ꪶꪱꪮꪋꪑꫀꪀꫂઽ ꪝiтꫝ : ꪒюꪑꪊ | ц/в . 🤩🤩🤩🎀🤩🤩🪦🤩🤩 b᥆᥆ઽꫂ ꪋꪀ᥆ꪀ rꫀqꫀઽtઽ || ꪎ 1𝟙𝟘

custom 536168527221808449843custom 539114565549218911440custom 531024291990554032035custom 53616388307367109868custom 53909077486637324738custom 53911207747466438658custom 53618501817823815347

28 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC540 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53102429199055403202custom 53911207747466438651

28 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC587 views119 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨🔤ꫀꪝ ℘᥆ઽt | fr᥆ꪑ dꪋꪑ℘nꫀઽઽ 🔥ꫀꪑ᥆᧒ꪱ ꪝiтꫝ :: ꪋкирꪋ | ц/в . . . 🤩🤩🤩🎀🤩🤩🪦🤩🤩 b᥆᥆ઽꫂ ꪋꪀ᥆ꪀ rꫀqꫀઽtઽ | click here

custom 539090774866373247334custom 539112077474664386531custom 536168527221808449825custom 53616388307367109868custom 53102429199055403207custom 53618501817823815347custom 53911456554921891147

27 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC525 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53616388307367109861custom 53616852722180844981custom 53909077486637324731

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dmpness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 983,820 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᥴыρ᧐ᥴᴛь” (@dmpness), 172 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmpness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.