Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 43 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,786–1,819 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 06:38
1,790
-3
10 Sept 2026, 17:39
1,793
-2
5 Sept 2026, 12:21
1,795
-6
1 Sept 2026, 10:26
1,801
-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:42
1,803
-4
23 Aug 2026, 11:17
1,807
-2
20 Aug 2026, 08:57
1,809
-1
17 Aug 2026, 15:36
1,810
-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:16
1,811
-4
7 Aug 2026, 18:19
1,815
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:18
1,815
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 23s
Average length
4m 23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
263 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
147
55.9%
👍
43
16.3%
❤🔥
23
8.75%
⚡
19
7.22%
🙏
8
3.04%
👌
6
2.28%
👀
4
1.52%
custom 5388943634349437274
3
1.14%
custom 5217791902023162643
2
0.76%
custom 5388841349703284277
2
0.76%
custom 5388992618451448101
2
0.76%
😍
1
0.38%
😱
1
0.38%
🤓
1
0.38%
🤝
1
0.38%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmitryspace_code. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сегодня настал тот самый день, если вы давно хотели собирать аналитику прохождения уроков.
ВАЖНО!
Потом не говорите, что я не предупреждал. Сегодня последний день, когда можно получить тариф раннего пользователя в Lessons Courses.
И сразу уточню: прямо сейчас сломив голову бежать и платить не нужно.
Достаточно подключить школу, и тариф раннего пользователя закрепится за вами на 6 месяцев.
А дальше:
Даже если сро…
👀 Кто проходит курс, а кто отстаёт — теперь видно всем
Администратор школы настраивает, какие группы и тренинги должны отображаться в таблице, сохраняет это как отдельное представление и отправляет ссылку кому нужно:
— владельцу школы
— менеджерам
— кураторам
— или даже самим ученикам
И вот последний вариант особенно интересный.
Теперь через Lessons Courses можно делать групповые рейтинги прохождения курса.
Доб…
Кто уже залетел на хакатон Чатиума - красавчики 🤓
Если по ходу реализации ваших идей возникнут вопросы по структуре, логике, сценариям или будет что-то непонятно, можете написать мне в ЛС, постараюсь помочь.
А кто ещё не зарегистрировался - не упускайте возможность. Неделя бесплатного доступа, за которую можно собрать реальный проект. Когда такое ещё будет?
⚠️ Проверьте ссылки на Telegram у себя на страницах
UPD: ссылки t.me снова заработали.
Сегодня ночью отвалился домен t.me по всему миру. Это не Telegram, не РКН, не локальная блокировка, а именно проблема с доменом на уровне DNS.
Проще говоря: человек нажимает на ссылку с сайта, лендинга, письма, рекламы или QR-кода - а браузер не понимает, куда его вести.
Внутри Telegram такие ссылки работают, но с доступом сна…
Я редко советую какие-то сервисы в канале, но...
В последнее время я переношу свои проекты на Chatium. В том числе перенёс туда основу GoalX. Потому что это очень сильно сокращает путь от идеи до продукта.
И сейчас у Chatium проходит бесплатный хакатон, где можно неделю без каких либо ограничений (в том числе финансовых) делать свой проект, тестировать платформу и собирать что-то реальное.
По сути, за неделю можно…
❓ Мне часто пишут по поводу плагинов Монитор автовебов, Виджет бронирования и других с вопросом можно ли их сейчас установить, поэтому отвечу тут — да, можно повторить этот функционал, но не в виде плагинов.
Если вам требуются плагины или разработка другого доп функционала для админов или учеников вашей школы, пишите — @DmitrySpace
Процесс обработки каждого сообщения в GoalX
Это то, что я называю "офисом нейроагентов")
Последние две недели я работаю над новым воркфлоу, чтобы сделать ответы ассистента по цели надёжнее, круче и предсказуемее.
Хотя на самом деле над ответом работает не один ассистент, а целых восемь нейроагентов с различными обязанностями.
Но запускаются они не все разом, а только необходимые. Кому именно поручать задачи опред…
2 неделя пилота продолжается ✍🏻
Один из участников отметил интересный момент.
Он сказал что ему нравится отчитываться о своих действиях в GoalX. Не только потому что это полезно. А потому что приложение оценивает то, что он сделал. И этот момент оценки сам по себе кажется важным.
Но прикол в том, что я не закладывал это как "фичу". Я просто хотел, чтобы система показывала траекторию))
Но оказывается, когда кто-то…
Неделю назад я запустил закрытый пилот GoalX 😳
И за эту неделю понял одну неприятную вещь:
большинству людей не нужен план.
Им нужен кто-то, кто отрежет лишнее и скажет, какое действие реально двигает к цели, а какое просто создаёт ощущение движения.
Именно это сейчас происходит в пилоте.
Люди приходят с нормальными целями.
Но почти всегда выясняется, что: — цель сформулирована размыто; — следующий шаг выбран сла…
👍6🔥3❤🔥2👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dmitryspace_code. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Павел Лещёв | Специалист по реабилитации ️ @santa_pavel_blog · 30,320 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dmitry Space кодит!” (@dmitryspace_code), 1,790 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmitryspace_code.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.