Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дмитрий Чешев Мотивационный спикер

@dmitrycheshev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,046subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781352788
TypeChannel
Username@dmitrycheshev
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dmitrycheshev

Growth

2,0412,0462,043.57 August 2026 — 2,042 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,041 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,046 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,040–2,047 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:172,046+5
8 Aug 2026, 01:212,041-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:482,042first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.57%
avg views ÷ 2,046 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held9 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,026
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3632.1%
2623.2%
🔥2522.3%
❤‍🔥98.04%
👏76.25%
💯65.36%
🎉10.893%
👎10.893%
💋10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC52 viewsread 7 August 2026

Почему отдых больше не помогает На канале ТЖ посмотрел видео о том, почему люди во все времена пытались уйти от тяжелой действительности, чем цифровой эскапизм отличается от настоящего отдыха, почему отпуск восстанавливает лучше «Тиктока» и почему побег от реальности сегодня все чаще зависит от денег. https://youtu.be/PWT5JBz6aas?si=QIYMtM9orKCFckHg

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

7 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC75 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не знаю как у вас, но у нас на районе в последнее время открываются все больше студий растяжки. Скоро будут уже в каждом доме. Такое ощущение, что все разом захотели стать более гибкими. На на самом деле причина популярности в том, что, растягивая мышцы и снимая напряжение в теле, мы также расслабляется эмоционально и снижаем уровень стресса. Через тело воздействуем на психику. А в последнее время у всех повышенный

1💯1

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

6 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

5 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC97 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы уже слышали эту новость Польский пловец Бартломей Кубковский переплыл Балтийское море. Это примерно 160 километров. Он плыл 55 часов без сна, отдыха и нормального питания. Это была его пятая попытка. Теперь он единственный человек на планете, переплывших Балтийское моря. Но какой ценой ему это далось. По ходу заплыва он терял сознание, а за два километра до финиша вообще ослеп от перенапряжения. Доплывал он уж

👍6👏4🔥3👎1

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

4 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC115 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А вы заметили этот парадокс? С одной стороны нам с детства говорили что умный учится на чужих ошибках, а дурак на своих. С другой стороны существует поговорка «Не ошибается только тот, кто ничего не делает». Получатся либо мы с вами все дураки. Либо единственный способ чему-то научиться - совершить ошибку.

👍4

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

4 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC121 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В эти выходные многое будет впервые Субботу и воскресенье проведу в Калуге, где состоится заплыв X-Waters. Это будет не обычный заплыв. Готовлюсь к нему особенным образом. Потому что впервые поплыву 10 км. Это марафонская дистанция в плавании. А для любого спортсмена - его первый марафон всегда что-то особенное. Но и сам заплыв X-Waters впервые пройдет в Калуге. Так что двойной дебют получается. А ещё в субботу я в

🔥10👍3

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

3 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC137 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Планируйте отдых заранее Вернулись из отпуска в Турции. Казалось бы, время для отпуска не самое подходящее. Кризис, трудности в бизнесе, нестабильность в деньгах. Но мы взяли путевки еще полгода назад. И обстоятельства не имели значение - нужно было ехать. Это было отличное решение. Организовать отпуск заранее. Если бы мы принимали решение позже, то никуда бы не поехали. Сами знаете, как это бывает. Когда навалива

👍11💯5🔥2

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

31 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC149 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Полезного контента до понедельника не будет. Горячее солнце и теплое море мешают мне думать. Поэтому просто хочется поделиться фотографиями из моего первого полноценного отпуска в жизни

👍116👏3🔥3

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

28 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC199 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня была мечта - встретить день рождения на море. Мечты должны сбываться. Турция. Средиземное море. Начал день с заплыва. Обычно пишут посты, что поняли о жизни к своему возрасту. Я понял только одно - жизнь бывает разная. Но какая бы она не была - она всегда прекрасна

19❤‍🔥9🔥7🎉1💋1

Signed Дмитрий Чешев

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @dmitrycheshev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 236,884 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дмитрий Чешев Мотивационный спикер” (@dmitrycheshev), 2,046 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmitrycheshev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.