Channel
@dmitriyrozhkov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
656subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001323244922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dmitriyrozhkov |
| Description | Жизнь / Финансовая независимость / Личная эффективность |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dmitriyrozhkov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 656 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 656 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
423 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 240 | 56.7% | |
| 🔥 | 92 | 21.7% | |
| 🤔 | 43 | 10.2% | |
| 👎 | 24 | 5.67% | |
| 💩 | 24 | 5.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 423reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2023 to 15 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmitriyrozhkov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 March 2023 to 15 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вы точно не Сократ Сократ был против записывания мыслей. Он считал, что письменность разучит людей запоминать и думать. Поэтому сам он не оставил после себя ни одной строчки и всё, что мы знаем, записали его ученики, в частности Платон. Самое смешное, что он был прав! https://dmitriyrozhkov.com/vy-tochno-nie-sokrat/
👍8
Знаете это чувство? Вы открываете свой Obsidian, смотрите на 847 заметок, аккуратно разложенных по папкам, связанных ссылками — и чувствуете лёгкую вину. Потому что последний раз вы заглядывали сюда месяц назад. И не потому что забыли. А потому что не было повода. Добро пожаловать в клуб. ## Ловушка второго мозга Концепция "второго мозга" захватила тусовку адептов продуктивности. Building a Second Brain Тиаго Фор…
👍50
Photo, posted without a caption
👍30
В изучении языков есть прием «найти языкового родителя», человека, который по какой-то причине хочет с тобой разговаривать. Терпелив. Постоянно держит тебя в зоне оптимального развития — т.е. на пол шага впереди. Поэтому раньше лучшим способом было изучение через постель — найти пару из местных. Многие выбрали абузного партнера, зеленую сову, и обрекли себя на страдания. Я же предлагаю ненасильственный способ. Chat…
👍27
Друзья, хочу представить свой новый проект — подкаст РОЖКОВ. Куда я приглашаю интересных людей, которым есть что рассказать про свою жизнь и профессию. https://t.me/rozhkov_podcast/11
👍10
https://dmitriyrozhkov.com/2023/
🔥25👍6
Video, posted without a caption
🔥21👍2
Хорошее интервью. Капитализм заменился технофедоадализмом. Бигтех - новый феодал, который собирает ренту со своих вассалов — капиталистов. Ситуация, в которой капиталист перестает играть ключевую роль и, будучи отрезанным от "облака", погибнет. В то же время, страны, в которых нет своего "облака", в пример приводится Европа, обречены на смерть или крестьянско-вассальное существование. Тем не менее биг тех все еще в…
🤔16
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx6gqR4jir79HfNTBWo8C0LiyCfPA-gqtm
👍3👎1
Записали эпизод про философию, фантастику и искусственный интеллект. https://youtu.be/_pChEyAD4mQ
🔥8👎2
Делаем небольшой ремонт в ванной, протравливаем плесень. Решил для этого взять средствсо с хлором, потому что не верю, что без хлора работает так же хорошо. Теперь в ванной пахнет свежестью бассейна 🤤
👍26
Что хорошо в холодном душе? Всегда знаешь сколько времени нужно. Поэтому можно даже за 10 минут до первого созвона принять душ и не переживать хватит ли времени 🤣
👍11🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dmitriyrozhkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дмитрий Р.” (@dmitriyrozhkov), 656 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmitriyrozhkov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.