4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 257–378 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 10:06
364
+8
16 Aug 2026, 06:15
356
+85
8 Aug 2026, 08:48
271
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:12
271
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 364 subscribers
Avg views / post
67.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (31 December 2025 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
202
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 58s
Average length
8m 29s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
240 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
100
41.7%
❤
94
39.2%
👍
10
4.17%
🤩
7
2.92%
⚡
6
2.50%
🎉
6
2.50%
🍾
5
2.08%
🙏
4
1.67%
🤔
4
1.67%
❤🔥
2
0.833%
🤯
1
0.417%
🥰
1
0.417%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
91
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 20 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmfilmmaker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎙 Нашёл новый сервис для генерации голоса: Fish Audio
Недавно наткнулся и сначала подумал, что это очередной Text-to-Speech: вставил текст, выбрал голос и скачал озвучку.
Но внутри оказалось гораздо больше 🚀
Сервис работает на модели S2.1 Pro, понимает русский язык и позволяет управлять подачей прямо внутри текста:
[whispering]
[laughing nervously]
[long pause]
[confident]
То есть можно менять настроение, темп и…
AI-ролик набрал 788 миллионов просмотров, имитируя настоящий бэкстейдж
В Instagram завирусилось видео, в котором съёмочная группа якобы уничтожает миниатюрный Майами огромной волной.
В кадре: построенный вручную город, камеры, свет, десятки специалистов и гигантский резервуар с водой.
Подпись звучит впечатляюще:
«Никакой компьютерной графики. Никакого композитинга. Только созданная вручную миниатюра Майами и 12-м…
🎬 Мастер-класс по цветокоррекции в DaVinci Resolve уже доступен!
Последние месяцы я полностью перерабатывал сайт, платформу и сам мастер-класс.
И наконец.. запуск состоялся!
Этот МК я сделал для тех, кто хочет перестать красить кадры “наугад” и наконец понять:
• как устроен Color Management
• как работать с нодами
• как делать чистую первичную коррекцию
• как создавать cinematic look
• как получать дорогую и профе…
Появилась бесплатная альтернатива Dehancer для DaVinci Resolve 🎞️
Если вы давно хотели попробовать плёночную эмуляцию, но не были готовы покупать Dehancer, появилась интересная новинка.
Разработчики выпустили Spektrafilm OFX - полностью бесплатный OpenFX-плагин для DaVinci Resolve. (Website)
И самое интересное - он не просто накладывает LUT.
Spektrafilm пытается воспроизвести сам фотохимический процесс:
— виртуа…
RED показала съёмку RAW без карт памяти
На Cine Gear Expo 2026 компании RED и iodyne продемонстрировали систему, в которой материал записывается не на карту внутри камеры, а сразу в большое внешнее хранилище.
В демонстрации использовались две камеры:
— RED V-RAPTOR XL X
— RED KOMODO-X
Обе передавали R3D RAW через сеть на Mac Studio Ultra, а затем материал в реальном времени записывался на 24-терабайтное хранилище…
AI-агенты справляются только с 36% сложных задач в постпродакшне
Последние несколько лет нам регулярно говорят, что AI скоро полностью заменит монтажёров..
Загружаем исходники, описываем результат - и искусственный интеллект сам собирает таймлайн, обрабатывает звук, добавляет эффекты и экспортирует готовый ролик 🚀
Но в реальной работе всё пока значительно сложнее!
В мае 2026 года исследователи представили CutVer…
Новый раздел на сайте: подборки оборудования для съёмки и монтажа 🎥
Всю последнюю неделю я собирал, проверял и приводил в порядок большой раздел с техникой для фильммейкеров!
Я создал подборки оборудования для разных задач и разного уровня:
— камеры и объективы;
— свет и модификаторы;
— звук;
— стабилизация и аксессуары;
— дроны;
— компьютеры, мониторы и оборудование для монтажа.
Есть варианты как для тех, кто то…
🚀 Higgsfield выпустили интеграцию для DaVinci Resolve
Похоже, AI всё ближе подбирается к привычному монтажному процессу.
Теперь прямо внутри DaVinci Resolve доступны:
• AI Video Generation
• AI Image Generation
• Remove Background
• Upscale Video
• Auto Reframe (16:9 → 9:16)
• Draw to Video
• Edit Video по текстовому запросу
Больше не нужно экспортировать клип, открывать браузер, ждать рендер и импортировать резу…
🚀 Друзья, вы давно спрашивали, а я наконец-то нашёл! -> нормальный сервис для оплаты зарубежных сервисов из РФ без постоянных ограничений.
Теперь можно оплачивать:
• ChatGPT
• Midjourney
• Adobe
• Canva
• Spotify
• Netflix
• YouTube Premium
• Coursera
• и любые другие зарубежные сервисы 🌍
Итак, что внутри:
✔️ виртуальные Visa / Mastercard
✔️ поддержка Apple Pay и Google Pay
✔️ пополнение через СБП, USDT и CryptoB…
Привет друзья ✌️
Делюсь одним из самых полезных сайтов для прокачки визуального вкуса, который я видел за последнее время.
EyeCandy
Если коротко - это огромная библиотека визуальных приемов, переходов, операторских решений, VFX, композиции, света, монтажных и рекламных техник.
Но главное - там не просто красивые референсы!
Там есть:
— название приема
— примеры использования
— разбор как это сделано
— категории
— …
Последние месяцы я всё чаще ловлю себя на мысли, что AI - это уже не просто инструмент.
Это новая инфраструктура.
Сейчас я строю filmmaking-академию 🎞️
И чем глубже мы погружаемся в разработку платформы, автоматизаций, обучения и внутренних процессов, тем сильнее я понимаю, насколько AI изменит рынок в ближайшие годы.
И речь уже давно не про “сгенерировать картинку”.
AI сегодня:
— помогает строить сайты и платф…
❤6🔥5🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dmfilmmaker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DM.Filmmaker” (@dmfilmmaker), 364 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmfilmmaker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.