Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Draw Master | Прогнозы на ничью в футболе

@dmfdp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

464subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002016187118
TypeChannel
Username@dmfdp
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dmfdp

Growth

463464463.56 August 2026 — 463 subscribers6 August 2026 — 463 subscribers12 August 2026 — 464 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 463–464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:43464+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:03463no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:46463first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.8%
avg views ÷ 464 subscribers
Avg views / post
152
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,046
Reactions total193
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

193 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9448.7%
🔥7639.4%
84.15%
🤝52.59%
21.04%
👎21.04%
🥴21.04%
🎃10.518%
🏆10.518%
👏10.518%
🤣10.518%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmfdp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

06.08.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇪🇺 Европа / Лига Европы / 19.00 Ягеллония (Пол) - Рейнджерс (Шот) ничья ❌ (2:1) ЦУПИС | 3.33 Pinnacle | 3.23 Пари №2 🇪🇺 Европа / Лига Конференций / 19.00 Ноа (Арм) - Сьон (Шва) ничья ✅ (2:2) ЦУПИС | 3.46 Pinnacle | 3.28 🔄🔄🔄 +1,46 фл.📈 Профит с 01.08 по 06.08: +1,30 фл.📊

🔥4👍3

5 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC83 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

05.08.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇦🇷 Аргентина / Примера Насьональ / 21.00 Альмагро - Химнасия и Тиро ничья ❌ (0:2) ЦУПИС | 2.69 Pinnacle | 2.69 Пари №2 🇦🇷 Аргентина / Примера / 03.15 Тигре - Бельграно ничья ✅ (0:0) ЦУПИС | 2.85 Pinnacle | 2.84 🔄🔄🔄 +0,85 фл.📈 Профит с 01.08 по 05.08: -0,16 фл.📊

👍6🔥4🏆1

4 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC91 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

04.08.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇪🇺 Европа / Лига Чемпионов / 21.00 Юнион Сент-Жиллуа (Блг) - Будё/Глимт (Нор) ничья ✅ (3:3) ЦУПИС | 3.73 Pinnacle | 3.69 Пари №2 🇺🇳 Сев. и Центр. Америка / Кубок Лиг / 03.00 Шарлотт (США) - Пумас (Мек) ничья ❌ (3:0) ЦУПИС | 3.68 Pinnacle | 3.67 🔄🔄🔄 +1,73 фл.📈 Профит с 01.08 по 04.08: -1,01 фл.📊

👍5🔥4

2 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC119 views9 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

03.08.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇷🇺 Россия / Первая Лига / 17.00 Уфа - КАМАЗ ничья ✅ (1:1) ЦУПИС | 3.26 Pinnacle | 3.20 Пари №2 🇧🇬 Болгария / Вторая Лига / 18.45 Этыр - Янтра Габрово ничья ❌ (2:1) ЦУПИС | 3.43 Pinnacle | 3.41 🔄🔄🔄 +1,26 фл.📈 Профит с 01.08 по 03.08: -2,74 фл.📊

👍53🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC121 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

02.08.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇦🇹 Австрия / Бундеслига / 18.00 Вольфсбергер - Аустрия Вена ничья ❌ (3:0) ЦУПИС | 3.45 Pinnacle | 3.49 Пари №2 🇵🇱 Польша / Премьер-лига / 18.30 Шлёнск Вроцлав - Ракув ничья ❌ (2:1) ЦУПИС | 3.36 Pinnacle | 3.39 🔄🔄🔄 -2,00 фл.📉 Профит с 01.08 по 02.08: -4,00 фл.📊

🔥4👍2👎1

1 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC132 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

01.08.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇷🇺 Россия / Премьер-Лига / 18.30 Динамо Махачкала - Локомотив Москва ничья ❌ (2:1) ЦУПИС | 3.50 Pinnacle | 3.47 Пари №2 🇭🇺 Венгрия / Лига NB 2 / 18.30 Казинцбарцикаи - Фехервар ничья ❌ (3:1) ЦУПИС | 3.26 Pinnacle | 3.00 🔄🔄🔄 -2,00 фл.📉 Профит с 01.08 по 01.08: -2,00 фл.📊

👍5👎1

1 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC123 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Итоги июля при работе фиксированным флэтом 📊 Всего пари: 61 Выигрышных пари: 15 Проходимость: 24,6% Средний кэф выигрышных пари: 3.26 Профит: -12,16 фл. 📉 Дистанция за 2026г.⏳ январь: -12,04 фл. февраль: +13,21 фл. март: -13,48 фл. апрель: +10,96 фл. май: +2,34 фл. июнь: -11,27 фл. июль: -12,16 фл. Итого с января по июль: -22,44 фл.

🤝4👍3🥴2🤣1

31 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC147 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Приветствуем! 🚗Приглашаем в августе принять участие в Гонке Капперов и побороться за место среди лидеров рейтинга! 🔥В августе проведём 4 крупных рекламных закупа под главные события месяца: 🇪🇺Квалификация ЛЧ 🎾US Open 🌟Для вас: 🟠Привлечение новой аудитории 🟠Больше трафика и увеличение активности в проекте 🌟Также в течение месяца будем регулярно публиковать: 🟠Свежую статистику по проходимости 🟠Отчёты по ROI 🟠Резуль

🔥3👍21🤝1

31 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC129 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

31.07.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇨🇭 Швейцария / Первая Лига / 20.30 Виль - Ксамакс ничья ❌ (1:2) ЦУПИС | 3.71 Pinnacle | 3.79 Пари №2 🇲🇽 Мексика / Лига Экспансьон МХ / 04.00 Коррекаминос - Тепатитлан де Морельос ничья ❌ (3:1) ЦУПИС | 3.16 Pinnacle | 3.13 🔄🔄🔄 -2,00 фл.📉 Профит с 01.07 по 31.07: -12,16 фл.📊

👍5🔥3👏1

30 Jul 2026, 04:40 UTC139 views9 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

30.07.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇪🇺 Европа / Лига Европы / 21.00 ЦСКА София (Бол) - Карабах (Азе) ничья ✅ (0:0 в основное) ЦУПИС | 3.31 Pinnacle | 3.31 Пари №2 🇦🇷 Аргентина / Примера / 03.15 Сентраль Кордоба - Атлетико Тукуман ничья ❌ (0:2) ЦУПИС | 3.04 Pinnacle | 3.01 🔄🔄🔄 +1,31 фл.📈 Профит с 01.07 по 30.07: -10,16 фл.📊

👍5🔥4

29 Jul 2026, 05:14 UTC147 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

29.07.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇪🇺 Европа / Лига Чемпионов / 18.00 Кайрат (Каз) - Омония (Кип) ничья ❌ (1:0) ЦУПИС | 3.34 Pinnacle | 3.33 Пари №2 🇰🇿 Казахстан / Кубок / 18.00 Кайсар - Женис ничья ❌ (3:1) ЦУПИС | 3.20 Pinnacle | 2.73 🔄🔄🔄 -2,00 фл.📉 Профит с 01.07 по 29.07: -11,47 фл.📊

👍4

28 Jul 2026, 05:21 UTC156 views10 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

28.07.2026 📌 Пари №1 🇪🇺 Европа / Лига Чемпионов / 18.00 КуПС (Фин) - Сабах Баку (Азе) ничья ❌ (0:2) ЦУПИС | 3.57 Pinnacle | 3.47 Пари №2 🇧🇷 Бразилия / Серия В / 01.30 Понте-Прета - Атлетик Клуб ничья ✅ (1:1) ЦУПИС | 3.21 Pinnacle | 3.30 🔄🔄🔄 +1,30 фл.📈 Профит с 01.07 по 28.07: -9,47 фл.📊

🔥71🎃1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dmfdp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 376,329 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Draw Master | Прогнозы на ничью в футболе” (@dmfdp), 464 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmfdp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.