Photo, posted without a caption
👍1🔥1

Channel
@dkhorushko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
248subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002293756156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dkhorushko |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dkhorushko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 248 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 249 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 249 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
83 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 39.8% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 14.5% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 8.43% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 🤷♀ | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1🔥1
Новые технологии — новые проблемы Люблю смотреть всякие красивые графики и таблицы. На Pinterest могу долго залипать в подборках инфографики от древности до наших дней. И вот во время одной из таких вылазок пришла банальная мысль: насколько же легче стало упаковывать аналитику в понятный вид и насколько тяжелее при этом стало ее воспринимать. Объясню в разрезе нашей работы. Чтобы создать дашборд со всякой аналитико…
❤2👍1👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4👏1
Лучше, чем в 20. Как я снова начал жить полной жизнью Последние два года я занимаюсь триатлоном. Не то чтобы спорт был мне чужд, но из‑за рождения ребенка, навалившейся работы, «Ковида» и всего этого хаоса я примерно четыре года почти ничем не занимался. Как результат: лишний вес, боли в спине и ощущение постоянной усталости. Ты весь день сидишь в офисе на стуле, приходишь домой — а сил ни на что уже нет. Нужно пои…
👍10🔥3❤1👏1
Цифровой национализм, онлайн-шопинг и тотальная слежка В прошлом видео мы заглянули в историю и интернет Японии. А в этот раз погрузились сразу в две страны: Южную Корею и КНДР. Корейский интернет — это два параллельных мира, в которых гораздо больше общего, чем кажется. В этом выпуске разберем: — Как в Южной Корее появился цифровой национализм, тотальная слежка, культ онлайн-шопинга и настоящие похороны Internet …
❤3🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
😁2
Воруйте ключи — это легко А помните, года четыре назад пытались запустить аналог «Нельзяграмма» — «Россграм»? Тогда еще СМИ писали что-то вроде: «Одногруппник Павла Дурова готовит ответ Западу». А комментаторы добавляли что-то вроде «Мужик, который был в Нью-Йорке, когда там был Стив Джобс, будет заниматься маркетингом этого супераппа». Сюр, конечно, полный. Но приложение все же запустили. Правда прямо перед запус…
❤3👍2🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁5👍1
Как хорошее становится плохим и снова хорошим Искал тут на днях заметку про веб-дизайн 1990-х в одном иностранном издании. Выяснилось, что она теперь в числе платных. А подписка на издание у меня кончилась. Ради одной заметки оплачивать целый месяц совсем не хочется (тем более я ее уже читал). В общем, как старый пират, я полез в Wayback Machine, вставил ссылку на нужную заметку и выбрал копию сайта за нужную дату.…
👍4🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2👍1
Давай бабос — и нет DDoS Оказывается, в третьем квартале 2025 года Россия вошла в топ-5 стран по DDoS-атакам. На всякий случай уточню: DDoS — это когда на сайт отправляют так много запросов, что он перестает отвечать или сильно замедляется. Естественно, по большей части хакеры так пытаются заработать: «Не хотите, чтобы ваш интернет-магазин лежал? Заплатите столько-то». Причем, атакуют чаще малый и средний бизнес, а…
👍3❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dkhorushko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 565,693 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дмитрий Хоружко” (@dkhorushko), 248 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dkhorushko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.