а ещё я сегодня круто уложила волосы, но меня никто не видел сегодня…. вот и думайте
custom 52220685426937191224

Channel
@dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 4 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001214743981 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkd |
| Description | Даша Кович — это стильно. https://vk.com/dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkd мой паблик в ВК! https://www.instagram.com/dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkd?igsh=MW91bXBuMTVwano3&utm_source=qr а это инста моя, кстати! https://www.tiktok.com/@dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdk?_t=ZS-8y |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:22 | 160 | no change |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 160 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (9 September 2026 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,356 |
| Reactions total | 100 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
184 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5316949322359653697 | 66 | 35.9% | |
| custom 5211192800736977450 | 29 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5379643556979817911 | 29 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5368718525978394490 | 28 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5381841729831845905 | 20 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5222068542693719122 | 8 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5357415430480735126 | 3 | 1.63% | |
| custom 5280485007066951963 | 1 | 0.543% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
а ещё я сегодня круто уложила волосы, но меня никто не видел сегодня…. вот и думайте
custom 52220685426937191224
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53796435569798179116custom 53818417298318459052
вот такой сегодня денек замерзла 🥶
custom 52804850070669519631
Че плачем, Дим?
custom 52111928007369774501
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53796435569798179116custom 53687185259783944901
Я пушистая мать
custom 53796435569798179112
теперь у меня есть кент джастин стоуни 😎😎😎😎
custom 53687185259783944907
I can buy myself flowers, CHMEL!!! Майла Сайрус и Бруно Марсе уже не те… всё под фанеру… отстой 👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿
custom 538184172983184590513custom 53796435569798179116custom 52220685426937191224
ещё чуть-чуть и я рил взорвусь 😋🔫🥹
custom 531694932235965369711custom 52111928007369774503custom 53796435569798179112custom 53818417298318459051
Поддержите репостом, сохранением, лайком да и просто добрым словом!🙏 Внизу очень крутой сниппет 😎 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdZ6GJwNksq/?stkn=MWFvcWtjNWUzbmR4dw== тут пока палить не буду
custom 531694932235965369710custom 53687185259783944904
Олл, помогите распространить Реально важно 😎 СЕЙЧАС И НИКОГДА уже в сети 😱 Слушайте по ссылке: https://band.link/nowandnever А также яндекс: https://clck.su/VUYli
custom 536871852597839449012custom 52111928007369774504
И я напоминаю, что 18.09 выходит мой новый сингл «Сейчас и никогда» 🩷 Делайте пресейвы по ссылке https://band.link/nowandnever пс пожалуйста 👀🐾😭
custom 53169493223596536977custom 53687185259783944903
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Даша Кович = ДК” (@dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkd), 160 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkdkd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.