Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اقتباسات حب ‘ عبارات حزينة ’ ستوريات

Channel

اقتباسات حب ‘ عبارات حزينة ’ ستوريات

@djobx1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

860subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001594343236
TypeChannel
Username@djobx1
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/djobx1

Growth

8608748676 August 2026 — 874 subscribers7 August 2026 — 873 subscribers15 August 2026 — 868 subscribers22 August 2026 — 865 subscribers29 August 2026 — 860 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 858–876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 12:23860-5
22 Aug 2026, 01:17865-3
15 Aug 2026, 03:34868-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:17873-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:46874first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 14 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2428.9%
2327.7%
👏1416.9%
💔1012.0%
😁89.64%
💯44.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2024 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2024, 06:51 UTC≈3,950 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

خَلصت وانتهت بس انه ملچِوم؟!!!!😔

💔9

6 Jul 2024, 18:05 UTC≈5,490 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍5💔1

17 Mar 2024, 14:19 UTC≈9,520 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"‏وظيفتي هي أن أقول الحقيقة ، لا أن أجعلك تؤمن بها. "

👏4💯4👍3

17 Mar 2024, 14:19 UTC≈9,060 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍92

16 Mar 2024, 11:21 UTC≈7,990 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‏ثم يأتيك بها الله وأنت تراها مستحيلة🖤

3

16 Mar 2024, 11:20 UTC≈8,260 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‏وممكن تكون نيتك الطاهرة سبب نجاتك دائمًا.🖤

4

16 Mar 2024, 11:20 UTC≈8,140 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

يُدبر الامر بينما انتہَ غارق في قلقك !🖤

6

14 Mar 2024, 09:32 UTC≈8,270 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‏من يهددك بالرحيل اهمس في اذنه هل تعرف الطريق أم اخبرك به .

👏9😁8👍51

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @djobx1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 491,766 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اقتباسات حب ‘ عبارات حزينة ’ ستوريات” (@djobx1), 860 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/djobx1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.