Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

D I Z Z Y

@dizzyan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

647subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002113800381
TypeChannel
Username@dizzyan
DescriptionПодиzzим? 30.10.1996 / 29 y.o / Male / Artist and Medical Student Links to my other galleries: Carrd: https://dizzyart.carrd.co/
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dizzyan

Growth

6476 Aug 2026, 12:37 — 647 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:31 — 647 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 12:376 Aug 2026, 17:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 646–648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 17:31647no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:37647first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.2%
avg views ÷ 647 subscribers
Avg views / post
551
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held17 (4 July 202628 July 2026)
Views total3,307
Reactions total246
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
660
Videos
65
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

624 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40064.1%
custom 52244453088758574677612.2%
custom 54000568020983057147011.2%
custom 5397571935884306548467.37%
custom 5400040356668531518294.65%
custom 540020040432984985030.481%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 624reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dizzyan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC301 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kandkaruPhoto

А вот и массовая атака, которую я довольно долго готовил, но очень старался успеть! ➖➖➖➖➖ And here is the mass attack that I prepared for quite a long time, but I tried very hard to make it in time! ➖➖➖➖➖ Attack on Zhulya🔞, Rimmcha, TGC🔞, Dizzy🔞, Psina🔞

custom 5397571935884306548146

27 Jul 2026, 22:14 UTC429 views59 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Для моего друга Раддика из Австрии :)

39custom 540005680209830571411custom 53975719358843065489

24 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC551 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

для @Dizzyart

42custom 522444530887585746712

19 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC775 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вижу движ со всеми оффтопами. Я подумал, а не создать ли мне свой. Я вообще путешествую много и иногда мысли всякие в голову лезут и я хотел бы их транслировать в более спокойной атмосфере. Я буду принимать не всех, учтите 👀 https://t.me/+PwBbk9QXAX45NjIy

32custom 54000568020983057144

17 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC659 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Для Касса

32custom 52244453088758574675custom 54000568020983057143

17 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC592 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Для Марка и Рэй!

30custom 54000568020983057145custom 53975719358843065482

13 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC674 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @art_by_caesarPhoto

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❗️ как и обещал, лотерея на арт! 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔣 1️⃣ подписка на логово цезаря¹⁸⁺ 2️⃣ репост на канал с 50+ подписчиками или 2 друзьям. не удалять до конца лотереи. прикрепите скриншот для подтверждения 3️⃣ порядковый номер в комментарии, 1 2 3 4 итд 4️⃣ референс персонажа в комментарии 🔤🔤🔤🔤 формат и идея арта на моё усмотрение. можете написать, что персонаж любит/не любит, табуированные темы. всем удачи! 🔤🔤

9custom 53975719358843065481

10 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC611 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @monstercheetahruPhoto

Для DizzyArt

30

10 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC706 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Открыл чат для комментариев

40

10 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC707 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#artfight #артфайт Attack 4️⃣ for Dizzy https://artfight.net/attack/15670141.astrel

19

6 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,680 views34 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Артфайт атака на Horitoy

28custom 54000568020983057144custom 53975719358843065482

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dizzyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 376,803 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“D I Z Z Y” (@dizzyan), 647 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dizzyan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.