Channel
@dizznat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
347subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002151223193 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dizznat |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dizznat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 347 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 341 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 341 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 9 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
136 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 39 | 28.7% | |
| custom 5362081079224180363 | 34 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 22.1% | |
| custom 5362023067100913161 | 9 | 6.62% | |
| custom 5377529853249592873 | 4 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5424894443352236421 | 4 | 2.94% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.21% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.21% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.21% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.47% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.47% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.735% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.735% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.735% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dizznat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2025 to 6 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Папка Ребят здаров, решили с чуваками собраться в папочку Запрос на визуал в целом становится все частотнее (по крайней мере мой опыт собесов это подтверждает) и почитать/поглядеть тех, кто реально может выдать вкуса и поделиться опытом, будто бы крайне ценная история Кладя руку на сердце искренне рекомендую познакомиться чё там за ребята, полюбасу откроете для себя алмазов с опытом вплоть до международного ССЫЛК…
🔥5❤3🥰2😁1
Кручу карту гироскопом Вайбкодинг и меня настиг, уже давненько начал с ним практиковаться и первым опытом было создание своего сайта, который можете заценить из пред поста или закрепа Подумал что было б кайф при выборе карты иметь возможность покрутить ее, оценить ближе к оригинальной физической оболочке с бликами, засветами и естественным поведением материала Купил штатив плотненько закрутил и прошу к оценке вот …
❤7🔥7🤯2
Про подборки Из мне известных, есть 4 потрсяных продукта, которые собирают в себе базу из крутых дизов. Мне посчастливилось попасть сразу в 4 из них, что несказанно льстит и греет мое эго как диза Wall Of Portfolios Lookzine Foliobin (тут даже огонек лутнул, спасибо Никита!) Foliodeck Три из них наши ебать, отечественные продукты! Поэтому им отдельная благодарка за движения в комьюнити и за то что добавили :) …
🔥8❤2🥰1
Слабое тестовое Залетела ко мне однажды одна студийка, пообщались, сошлись по взглядам и двинули дальше - дали тестовое, чисто на оценку сходимся не сходимся по визуалу Погружая в контекст - надо было за пару часов отрисовать 2 экрана для апки скрин тайм трекера (формата Opal, Jomo, Brainrot и т.п.), сделал чуть больше чем два сори Меня жестко погрузили в детали по визуальным предпочтениям, по философии, по взаимо…
❤8🔥5😢2😐1
File, posted without a caption
🔥5❤1👏1💊1
Битло закину между делом, тоже дизайн своего рода Позже поделюсь сторкой про одно слабое тестовое
🔥4❤1😁1
Феррари лус — мультиграф Не так давно выкупил твиттер. По концептам/вайбкод экспериментам буквально кладезь рефов, жёстко рекомендую Увидел как один чел отрисовал в фигме 8 состояний мультиграфа от нового дизайна Ferrari Luce и решил тоже трайнуть, отрисовал секундомер Приглашаю всех к себе в твитак, го читать друг друга В коментах закину в хорошем качестве
❤8🔥5💘1🤯1
Чё то я затих пиздец
👏2
Испытываем невероятный хайпинг
custom 536208107922418036315
Khasan Khatoyan @allbedesign Moscow, Russia • English, Russian, Armenian, Kurdish #ProductDesign #WebDesign #DesignSystem #Motion #Branding #GraphicDesign #Creative ● Career — Senior Product Designer at VCG Markets — Ex-Senior Product Designer at Juno — Ex-Product Designer at CORE ● Achievements — Led the full product development cycle at fintech startup CORE, with a subsequent $500k investment raise — Built a fra…
custom 536208107922418036314custom 53775298532495928734
Ну все, бг блюр теперь культивирован Ваще прикольно, в сравнении с ранее слитыми концептами сами стёклышки выглядят приятнее, им глубины чтоль добавили, с тенями мягкостью поиграли Кароче не просто бг блюра накинули
custom 53620230671009131619custom 53620810792241803635custom 54248944433522364214
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dizznat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 825,056 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“дизнат” (@dizznat), 347 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dizznat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.