Channel
@dizibiz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
104subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001783800071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dizibiz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dizibiz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 104 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:12 | 102 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 101 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 102 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 103 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 103 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 31.9% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 21.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| custom 5291787282225832937 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.13% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⁉️Почему конкуренты продают дороже, хотя продукт такой же? Посмотрите на две фотографии. Это два цветочных магазина. Ассортимент одинаковый. Флористы хорошо собирают букеты и там и там. Но в какой магазин вам хочется зайти? Именно так начинается выбор у большинства клиентов - с оценки внешнего вида бизнеса. Не только в цветочном бизнесе! Но и при выборе производства или специалиста. В сфере услуг. На маркетплейсах.…
❤2💯2🔥2
Визитки, как у взрослой ☺️ Неоднократно сталкивалась с ситуацией, когда во время экскурсии ко мне подходили и просили «визитку», которой у меня не было) так я поняла, что они очень нужны. Не все люди активно пользуются соцсетями, поэтому визитка выручает в такой ситуации. Заказала дизайн у своей подружки дизайнера Анечки - вот канал ее студии дизайна. Я в восторге от такой визитки, кроме пользы - это еще и настоящая…
💯5❤4🔥4😇2
А у нас новый отзыв 🫠💓 ⬇️
❤2
🎇Недавно мы сделали логотип для клиента в нейросети! Дали задачу разработать знак для компании складкской логистики Lammash (автоматизация, стеллажи). И конечно он взял в основу базовые идеи, которые первые приходят на ум: стеллажи, соединения, конструкции, складская геометрия. То есть всё то, что уже десятки раз использовали компании из этой отрасли. ‼️И в этом главный парадокс: Если показать такой знак без подп…
❤3❤🔥2🏆2
⁉️Почему один дизайнер сдаёт проект с десятого раза, а другой попадает практически сразу? Со стороны кажется, что дело в опыте, насмотренности или удаче. Но чаще причина в том, откуда начинается работа над проектом. Можно открыть Pinterest, собрать референсы и искать красивую форму. А можно сначала разобраться в самом бизнесе: • что лежит в основе бренда, • как выглядит рынок, • какие смыслы важно донести до аудито…
❤4👏2🔥1🥰1custom 52917872822258329371
Почему одни компании запоминаются, а другие остаются просто очередным игроком на рынке? Часто дело не в продукте и даже не в логотипе. Дело в том, что многие компании говорят о себе одинаковыми словами: качество, надёжность, опыт, профессионализм. Когда все транслируют одно и то же, отличаться становится сложно. Именно с этой задачей мы столкнулись, разрабатывая логотип для завода железобетонных изделий «ПромБетон…
💯3🔥3👨💻2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @dizibiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДИЗ и БИЗ | дизайн и бизнес” (@dizibiz), 104 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dizibiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.