Channel
@dizaynerlar_kitobi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002849578692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dizaynerlar_kitobi |
| Description | Dizayn, marketing va shaxsiy rivojlanish haqidagi kitoblarni o‘qib, amalda samarali bo‘lgan narsalarni siz bilan baham ko‘raman Muallif: @akmal_artfocus |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dizaynerlar_kitobi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 57 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 57 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 25 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
58 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 48 | 82.8% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 13.8% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hamkasblardan yangi yil sovg'asi 😊 Kitobdan yaxshiroq qanday sovg'a bo'lishi mumkin!? Shu kitobni anchadan beri olishni xohlab yurgan edim, vanihoyat sovg'a sifatida qabul qildim. Alifda o'tgan 2025-yil o'zim uchun eng yaxshi va o'sishga boy yil bo'ldi. Kompaniyadagi task-management tizimlari hattoki qanchalik o'sganingizni raqamlarda ham ko'rsatib bera oladi. Xususan 2025-yilda dizayn jamoamiz 10 300 dan oshiq po…
👍5
Rasmdagi qaysi idishga ko'proq suyuqlik sig'adi? Agar siz ham 1 deb o'ylasangiz adashasiz. Aslida ularni ikkalasini ham hajmi bir xil. Xo'sh, nega bizga birinchi idish ko'proq hajmga ega bo'lib ko'rinadi? Ushbu tajribani Nyu York universiteti marketing professori Priya Ragubir o'rganib chiqqan. Tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, xaridorlar birinchi o'rinda qadoqning balandligiga e'tibor qaratishadi. Idish qanchalik bal…
👍6
Sloganlardagi semantik ziddiyat: nima uchun "Noyob muhandislik yechimi - kafolatlangan natija" slogani ishlamaydi. Kommunikatsiyalarda faqatgina biz nima deyotganimiz emas, balki so‘zlarning bir-biri bilan qanday ishlashi ham muhim ahamiyatga ega. Ba’zi brend sloganlarida semantik ziddiyatni kuzatamiz — bu bir-biriga qarama-qarshi bo‘lgan ma’nolar to‘qnashuvi. Yuqoridagi sloganni nimasi xato? "Noyob muhandislik yec…
👍2
Text vs Display shriftlar: farqi nimada, va buni bilish nega muhim? Shriftlar bilan ishlaganda eng avvalo tushunishimiz kerak bo‘lgan narsalardan biri matn (text) va displey (display) shriftlar o‘rtasidagi farqdir. Ularning tashqi ko‘rinishi o‘xshash bo'lgani bilan vazifalari, tuzilishi va qo‘llanilish usullari butunlay boshqacha. Matn shriftlar: o‘qish uchun yaratilgan. Matn shriftlari kichik o‘lchamlarda iloji bo…
👍8
Texnik topshiriqni vizualdagi o'rni haqida (Piala Gold misolida) 🫖 1. Sotuvchi post Asosiy e’tibor mahsulot va uning foydasiga qaratiladi. Yirik planda, "100ta paket" haqida bildirib mahsulotni ratsional ustunligini oshiramiz. 2. Imidj uchun post Bu yerda mahsulot tarixning bir qismiga aylanadi. Biz shunchaki choy sotmaymiz — biz "Keniyaning haqiqiy ta’mi"ni yetkazamiz. Minimal matn, premium darajadagi dizayn — bul…
💯3
Agressiv marketingni ilk uchqunlari ⚡ Esingizda bo‘lsa, yuqoridagi postda TBC marketing direktorining agressiv marketing haqidagi fikrlari bilan bo‘lishgandim. O‘shanda bizdagi fintex bozori bunga hali tayyor emasligini bilardik. O‘quv markazlar sektori esa agressiv marketingga 100% tayyor. Sababi 7-8 yil ichida ingliz tili o‘quv markazlari bozori juda rivojlanib ketdi. Chet ellik o‘qituvchilar yoki zamonaviy inte…
👍5
Mahsulotning narxi faqat raqamlarda emas! (p.s. Shu yerda ozgina qiyin iboralar mavjud, nima ham derdim kitobda shunday yozilgan) Eksplitsit va implitsit qiymat tushunchalari mavjud. 👉Eksplitsit - narx yorlig‘ida to‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri ko‘rsatilgan raqamlar. 👉Implitsit - yashirin, kontekst signallari va vizual dizayndan hosil bo‘ladigan narx tushunchasi. 📌 Bu dizaynerlar uchun nega muhim? Chunki to‘g‘ri dizayn haqiqiy…
👍3
Inson tezkor xotirasida nechtagacha elementni saqlab turishi mumkin?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Economist jurnalining rasmiy saytida bir qancha yillar avval quyidagi prays qo'yilgan: 1. Elektron versiya - 59$ 2. Qog'ozli versiya - 125$ 3. Qog'ozli va elektron versiya birgalikda - 125$ Natija qanday deb o'ylaysiz? Elektron versiyani bor-yo'g'i 16% xaridorlar xarid qilgan 3-variantdagi qog'ozli va elektron birgalikda tarifini esa qolgan 84% xaridorlar tanlagan. 2-tarifda hech kim xarid qilmagani uchun, uni olib…
👍3
Ozon’ni mashhur reklama-slogani mavjud Руки-загребуки (emotsional jihatdan buning ma’nosi katta qo‘llar - ko‘proq xarid qilish uchun) O‘zbekiston auditoriyasi uchun yoqilgan reklamada, qiziq tarjimaga ko‘zim tushdi: Ketmon qo‘llar - bu tarjima ruscha so‘zni to‘g‘ri ifodalasa-da, mijozlar ongida kerakli signalni uyg‘otmaydi. Hattoki kimdirlar uchun kulgili bo‘lib ham tuyilishi mumkin 🤣 Tahrirchi platformasida bu so…
👍12👎2
#tanqidiy_fikr Beshqozon restaylingini hamma ko'rgan bo'lsa kerak. Taklif etilgan rang sistemasida bir qancha muammolar mavjud. Masalan bitta rang bir nechta ma'nolarni bildirmoqda. Olovrang bu Nurafshon filialining ajratuvchi rangi (o'zi xar bir filialga alohida rang berish talabi qayerdan kelib chiqqani ham qiziq) va bir vaqtning o'zida bu rang zig'ir osh belgisi va express tarmog'ining ham ajratuvchi rangi ekan…
💯5
Sun’iy intellekt dizaynerning hayotini osonlashtiradi - lekin uni prompt-injenerga aylantirmoqda 🤖 Kecha deyarli kun bo‘yi avto-mahsulotlar uchun kreativlar tayyorladim va o‘zimni dizayner emas, balki prompt muhandisidek his qilayotganimni angladim. Boshqa tomondan, sun’iy intellektsiz bunday tovarlani fotosyomkasiz bajarishni umuman iloji yo'q. Ayniqsa byudjeti kam bo'lgan yoki ko'p resurs sarflash kerak bo'lmaga…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @dizaynerlar_kitobi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Inson tezkor xotirasida nechtagacha elementni saqlab turishi mumkin?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2025 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 759,244 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dizaynerlar kitobi” (@dizaynerlar_kitobi), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dizaynerlar_kitobi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.