Channel
@diyor_blog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001424828820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diyor_blog |
| Description | Shaxsiy fikrlarim, hayotiy tajribalar, qisqacha ma'lumotlar va kerakli maslahatlar ulashaman 🎯 Balki foydasi tegar... Bog'lanish uchun : @diyor_zoyirov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diyor_blog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 30 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 30 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
217 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 83 | 38.2% | |
| 🔥 | 48 | 22.1% | |
| 😢 | 24 | 11.1% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 6.45% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 5.99% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 5.07% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 4.15% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 2.30% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.922% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.461% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 217reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2022 to 23 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Taak, 1yil bo'ldiya... Assalomu alaykum, barchaga yaxshimisizlar) Sizlarga o'z minatdorchiligimni bildirib qo'ymoqchiman, bu kanalda hali ham borligingiz uchun! O'tmishdagi habarlarimni o'qib, turli-xil voqea hodisalar esimga tusha boshladi, barchasi qiziq-qiziq jarayonlar Bu kanaldan maqsad ham o'zimni qanchalik o'zgarib borayotganimni ko'rib borishdir Juda ko'p narsalar yozmoqchi edim, 1yillik xulosalarim bo'y…
⚡12
Siz o'ylagan chegaralar faqat sizni boshizda, real dunyoda ular yo'q @diyor_blog
🔥4
Yaxshi mutaxasis boʻlishi mumkin, lekin yaxshi inson boʻlmasa, unday inson bilan ishlamagan ma’qul! @diyor_blog
🔥12
Biz o‘z imkoniyatlarimizni ko‘ra ololmaymiz, ko‘pchilik tashqi tomondan qidirishadi o‘zi xohlayotgan narsani, aslida esa ular o‘z qo‘lingizda va atrofingizda. Men shu vaqtgacha nimaiki ish yoki biror narsa bo‘lsa hammasi, o‘zimni atrofimdagi imkoniyatlarni to‘g‘ri qo‘llaganimdan deb bilaman... Lekin bir narsa ham bor, imkoniyatni ko‘rib tursangizu, unga erisha ololmasligingiz ham mumkin, sababi u imkoniyatga siz to…
👍6💯5🔥1
Nega inson pul kerakligini, juda ham ehtiyoji borligini bilib ham, maksimal darajada harakat qilmaydi... Bu yerda harakat = ibodat va o'z ustida ishlash nazarda tutilgan! Sizlarda ham bu borada qanaqadir yechim bormi? Men taniydigan kuchli mutahasis bolalar bor, shunchaki maksimal o'z patensalidan foydalanishmaydi 👀 P.S. Javobingizni kutaman ) @diyor_blog
👍6🔥2⚡1
Hozirgi paytda tezlik juda muhim Oddiy misol, agar siz qaysidir soha vakili boʻlsangiz, mijozingizga boshqalardan koʻra, tez javob bersangiz — proyekt sizniki degani) Proyekt bu — soqqa)) Bu aytganim kichik misol edi, aslida tezlik undan ham katta narsalar ta’sir kuchiga ega! @diyor_blog
🔥6👍2⚡1
Hayot ham bir qiziq-a) kechagina hammasi yaxshi, joyida boʻlgan ishing, umuman hamma narsa bugun oʻz-oʻzidan yomon boʻlib qoladi, tushunmay qoladi kishi) Analiz qilasiz, hammasi joy-joyida lekin birdan siz kutmagan holda yomon ahvolda boʻlib qoladi🥲 Sizda ham shunday holat boʻlib turadimi, qanday yechim qilasizlar? @diyor_blog
💯8😢3👎1
O’z yashayotgan joyingizda (oʻzbekiatonda) muvaffaqiyatga erishmagan boʻlsangiz, Amerikaga bormang! Sizda u yerda ham muvaffaqiyat boʻlmaydi. Chunki muvaffaqiyatni qoidalari bir xil) Mehnatkashlik, intilish va hech qachon, hech kimni yordamiga qaramasdan yashash! Shu narsaga siz tayyor boʻlsangiz, shu yerni oʻzida ham katta muvaffaqiyatga erishishingiz mumkin… ©️podcast'dan parcha @diyor_blog
🔥8👍2❤1
Bugun bir taksist amaki bilan gaplashib, qoldim... Va gaplarimiz o‘rtasida, ukam "Biz Allah ni, unutib qo‘ygan bandalarmiz, nafsimiz va dunyo tashvishlari bilan ovora bo‘lib qolganmiz" - deydi 🥲 Faqat, besh mahal namoz o‘qish va Jumaga chiqish bilan ish bitmaydi. Boshqa tomonlar ham bor, buni faqat his qilib shu narsalarga amal qilishimiz kerak deb suhbatga yakun yasadik Shunchaki, boshqacha bo'ldim... P.S. Sizg…
😢7❤🔥3👍2
Sizlarga ham tavsiya qilaman, telefon bo‘ladimi, bilmadim biror gadjetingizni ekraniga, ushbu rasmni qo‘ysangiz! Ko‘zingiz bir marta tushib, shuni chin qalbdan o‘qisangiz, InshaʼAllah balki sizni ham, g‘am tashvishingiz bo‘lsa, Alloh tola ketqizar... @diyor_blog
👍10❤7❤🔥2
Ohirgi paytlarda jamoaga odam olishda o’zim ma’sulman Shuni bildimki, ishga kirmoqchi boʻlgan “kondedatlar”, na yozish madaniyatini, na zoomda oʻzini tutish madaniyatini, u ham mayli gapirish madaniyati ham juda zaif axvolda( Bilmadim, bu ketishda nima boʻladi( @diyor_blog
😢10
Agar nima uchun sizga biror nima kerak ekanligini, rostan bilsangiz, qanaqa qilib ega bo'lish sababini topasiz... @diyor_blog
👍10🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @diyor_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,441,099 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Diyor Zoyirov | DZ” (@diyor_blog), 30 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diyor_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.