高雄最近超紅的寶藏妹子 這顏值跟身材真的太頂了! ✨ 黑色長髮 + 空氣瀏海 甜度直接爆表 ✨ 四肢纖細超瘦 胸部卻極度爆滿 以為只是靠臉?服務主動熱情到不行 配合度高又貼心 CP值直接拉滿!來高雄沒約到這位真的會後悔 推薦給追求高品質體驗的大大們! 敏敏 158cm . 44kg . D奶 . 22歲
❤1👍1💋1🤩1
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排

Channel
@diy5845
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,675subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001712340594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diy5845 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diy5845 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 4,675 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 4,678 | +31 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 4,647 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 4,647 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,569 |
| Reactions total | 96 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
96 reactions across 25 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 23 | 24.0% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 20.8% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 19.8% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 10.4% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.17% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
高雄最近超紅的寶藏妹子 這顏值跟身材真的太頂了! ✨ 黑色長髮 + 空氣瀏海 甜度直接爆表 ✨ 四肢纖細超瘦 胸部卻極度爆滿 以為只是靠臉?服務主動熱情到不行 配合度高又貼心 CP值直接拉滿!來高雄沒約到這位真的會後悔 推薦給追求高品質體驗的大大們! 敏敏 158cm . 44kg . D奶 . 22歲
❤1👍1💋1🤩1
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
南部新朋友的解鎖記錄📝 第一次嘗試 5000素質結束緊接著在到17000一節的大學畢業超顏值甜心,親身體驗才知道什麼叫差距 正如50元的蛋糕與100元的蛋糕,用料與口感高下立判 結束後大大滿意到詞窮,只剩一句「這個真的很棒!」質感與甜度雙重到位💯 拿捏得明明白白 體驗過就知道差距在哪!
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
謝謝來自美國的新朋友 第一次溝通就把預算 喜好和住宿需求全拍板 接下來的建議也是全盤信任、全程超級阿莎力 沒有來回拉扯,只有滿滿的信任與配合 謝謝這份爽朗的支持 感恩在心!🙌✨
👍2🔥1
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
大家早安安~~
🥰2
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥰1
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
所有的相遇 都是久別重逢 25年剛認識的弟弟 時隔整整一年 兜兜轉轉居然又找到我了! 當下收到訊息真的超開心~ 弟弟找到我的第一件事 居然是秒預約阮阮家的好妹妹! 只能說你運氣真的太好 哈哈哈 剛好碰上我們家的香水櫃姐還在兼職中 立馬幫你優先安排起來安排得妥妥的✨ 感動ing 隔了這麼久你還一直記得我、還能找回我,而且第一時間就是直接行動力滿滿地來支持我 謝謝弟弟這份一直放在心上的真誠與支持🫰
👍2❤1💯1
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
我嘞個去 碰上真帝王 肉棒?⭐
🤣6👀1🔥1
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
😰
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
癲.....下雨嘍
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
夜市氛圍𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑠 ˃̵͈̑ᴗ˂̵͈̑ 💕
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
上次約了一節根本意猶未盡! 今天下班直接「衝兩節」玩飽飽!🔥 哈哈 謝謝大大的好評捧場 大大直言:「桃桃洗澡比我女友洗得還仔細!」 哈哈哈這評價太高啦 📍 #台中桃桃可約預約中 想解鎖最貼心的互動? 感興趣的大大趕快來密我預約喔 📥
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
#給我親愛的大大開始計劃19號大包夜嚕✌️ 有些緣分 真的不是一句「謝謝」可以說完 話不需要太多 真心才是最難得的 一直以來的信任 理解和支持 很多時候不用多說 一個默契、一份配合,就能感受到彼此的用心 其實最珍貴的,不是表面上的熱絡 而是在相處過程中累積下來的那份舒服與安心 真誠的人,無論走到哪裡,都會被感受到 當你願意用真心對待別人,對方也一定看得見你的認真 這個時代不缺表面的關係,難得的是遇到一個願意尊重、願意理解、願意給予信任的人 有人說人心難測,但我始終相信,世界上總有一些溫暖的人,會在不經意間照亮別人 很幸運能遇見這樣的大大 不只是一次次的支持,更像是多了一位可以信任、可以聊天、可以互相理解的朋友知己
👍9💯2👏1
Signed 小阮Gleezy:rxm218(北中南皆可安排
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @diy5845. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 54,780 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“阮阮全台嚴選の高品質外約🇹🇼+Gleezy:rxm218” (@diy5845), 4,675 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diy5845.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.