Channel
@dixiezone
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
404subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001561143679 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dixiezone |
| Created | 23 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dixiezone |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 404 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 403 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 403 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
182 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 44.5% | |
| ⚡ | 34 | 18.7% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 13.7% | |
| 🤬 | 15 | 8.24% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 4.95% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 4.40% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 4.40% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2024 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
“Family gatherings are natural, and right, and good. I approve of them with all my heart. It does me good to see them kept up. They are one of the very pleasant things which has survived the fall of man. Next to the grace of God, I see no principle which unites people so much in this sinful world as family sentiments. Community of blood is a most powerful tie. It was a fine saying of an American naval officer, when h…
❤5👍1
Ukrainian girl flees Ukraine to get away from the war and gets to America only to be stabbed to death by one of our blacks, she was safer in Ukraine
🤬15😢9💯6
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡11🔥5💯2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡14❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11⚡9
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11
If you want an an example of the deep-seated anti-Christianity that exists in the South, keep in mind that this song went to #1 on the country charts. Christians need to have an open, honest discussion of the South and Southern identity that is more than rehashing talking points about slavery. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMvyM3iReZA
👍5
“But while we believe that ‘God made of one blood all nations of men to dwell under the whole heavens,’ we know that the African has become, according to a well-known law of natural history, by the manifold influences of the ages, a different, fixed species of the race, separated; from the white man by traits bodily, mental and moral, almost as rigid and permanent as those of genus. Hence the offspring of an amalgama…
❤10👍1
Herman Bavinck in a journal entry from that period (1908), he wrote about how “a Southerner” had told him African Americans were “not humans” (rather, he was told, they were a mixture of human and ape).
❤10👎1
Colonial Virginia September 17th, 1630. [Perhaps Hugh Davis received a whipping and had to acknowledge that he committed fornication with an African woman because the legislators believed that interracial fornication was more sinful. Compare Davis's punishment with that handed out to Robert Sweat in 1640.] Hugh Davis to be soundly whipped, before an assembly of Negroes and others for abusing himself to the dishonor…
❤6
“In fact these dark skinned people would have worried them to a point that they would become part of their descriptions of the devil himself. The few records that exist of the Puritans describing what they felt was the devil sound a lot like a black man dressed like an Indian. Therefore black or red did not really matter to them, they were all the devil’s children if they were not created in God’s image of being Whit…
👍5❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dixiezone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,317,995 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dixiezone (Confederate Ethnostate)” (@dixiezone), 404 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dixiezone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.