Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مجمع دیوانگان

Channel

مجمع دیوانگان

@divanesara

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

13,595subscribers

-100 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001003065299
TypeChannel
Username@divanesara
Descriptionوبلاگ «مجمع دیوانگان» از سال ۱۳۸۶ آغاز به کار کرد و نسخه تلگرامی آن با سه نویسنده مدیریت می‌شود. اینجا به مسایل روز، سیاست، جامعه و هنر می‌پردازیم. . ارتباط با ادمین کانال: @DivaneSaraAdmin . اینستاگرام: instagram.com/divanesara_
Created2 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/divanesara

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,59513,73713,6665 August 2026 — 13,695 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,695 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,694 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,685 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,695 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,699 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,692 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,691 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,690 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,689 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,690 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,688 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,687 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,686 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,694 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,713 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,711 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,710 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,708 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,709 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,705 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,704 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,706 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,710 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,724 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,735 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,737 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,736 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,733 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,720 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,693 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,678 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,676 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,674 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,673 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,664 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,659 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,654 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,662 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,654 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,649 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,650 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,649 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,645 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,624 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,622 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,620 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,617 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,615 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,606 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,607 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,610 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,607 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,604 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,598 subscribers11 November 2026 — 13,595 subscribers5 August 202611 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 97 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,574–13,758 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 03:4613,595-3
9 Nov 2026, 12:3513,598-6
6 Nov 2026, 01:0713,604-3
4 Nov 2026, 21:5613,607-3
3 Nov 2026, 20:5713,610+3
2 Nov 2026, 22:1513,607+1
1 Nov 2026, 22:2613,606-9
31 Oct 2026, 20:1113,615-2
30 Oct 2026, 21:3913,617-3
29 Oct 2026, 21:4613,620-2
29 Oct 2026, 01:0913,622-2
27 Oct 2026, 21:0913,624-21
26 Oct 2026, 18:5013,645-4
24 Oct 2026, 18:0813,649-1
23 Oct 2026, 18:3013,650+1
22 Oct 2026, 20:1813,649-5
21 Oct 2026, 15:0613,654-8
20 Oct 2026, 13:3713,662+8
19 Oct 2026, 11:1813,654-5
18 Oct 2026, 12:1813,659first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 13,595 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.569%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held43 (19 February 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total20,560
Reactions total117
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 19:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈753
Videos
≈140
Links
≈1,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22m 40s
Average length
5m 40s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,499 reactions across 41 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,31687.8%
👎18312.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,536 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,290 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

✍️ فایل‌های صوتی سومین جلسه از سلسله جلسات «بازی تمام شد». این فایل، به گفتاری اختصاص دار با عنوان «زمانه‌ی بازخوانی». در این گفتار با گوشه‌ی چشمی به رمان «خاکستر» از حسین سناپور و البته برخی رمان‌ها و فیلم‌های دیگر دهه‌ی نود، تلاش کردم که نشان دهم آن دهه (حد فاصل ۸۸ تا ۹۸) بیش از هرچیز رنگ و بوی نوعی بازخوانی تاریخی را داشت. چه در میان توده‌هایی که به ناگاه بار دیگر به تاریخ ایران باستان اقبال نشان دادند و چه در می…

👍11

1 Nov 2026, 18:49 UTC≈2,620 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

✍️ فایل‌های صوتی دومین جلسه از سلسله جلسات «بازی تمام شد». این فایل، به گفتاری اختصاص دار با عنوان «عصر تردید». در این گفتار تلاش کردم با بهره‌گیری از دو رمان «ویران می‌آیی» و «دود»، هر دو از حسین سناپور، به مرور دهه‌ی هشتاد خورشیدی (حد فاصل سال‌های ۱۳۷۸ تا ۱۳۸۸) بپردازم. دورانی که با سرکوب‌ها و شکست‌های پیاپی، نطفه‌های تردید و شکست را در دل جنبش اصلاحات کاشت، و در نهایت نه تنها به شکاف میان «بدنه‌ی جنبش، با جریان س…

👍15

27 Oct 2026, 00:30 UTC≈3,190 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

✍️ فایل‌های صوتی نخستین جلسه از سلسله جلسات «بازی تمام شد». این دو فایل، به گفتاری اختصاص دارند با عنوان «عصر طغیان» که به مرور دهه‌ی هفتاد، و نطفه‌های شکل‌گیزی جنبش اصلاحات اختصاص داشت. متاسفانه ضبط صدا با کیفیت مطلوبی انجام نشد و تلاش‌ برای ویرایش آن با ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی هم در نهایت به همین کیفیتی رسید که تقدیم می‌شود. پیشاپیش از بالا و پایین شدن گاه و بیگاه صدا پوزش می‌خواهم. جلسه‌ی دوم این مجموعه، پنج‌شنبه‌ی…

👍22

26 Oct 2026, 19:43 UTC≈2,410 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

✍️ برشی از نشست نخست سلسله جلسات «بازی تمام شد» که به مرور دهه‌ی هفتاد اختصاص داشت. جلسه‌ی دوم، پنج‌شنبه‌ی این هفته با مروری بر دهه‌ی هشتاد (سال‌های ۷۸ تا ۸۸) برگزار خواهد شد و در آن تلاش خواهم کرد به شکاف میان جنبش اجتماعی با جریان اصلاحات، و همزمان شکافی در درون جامعه اشاره کنم که پس از آن بسیاری از مرزها را آشفته کرد و بنیان سوءتفاهمات و جدل‌هایی را پایه گذاشت که تا همین امروز شاهدشان هستیم. برای حضور در نشست‌ها…

👍11

26 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTC≈2,240 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026

سایه‌های ذهنیت اخلاقی/مذهبی، بر تحلیل‌های تاریخی #A 489 Whenever people lack empirically-based knowledge about social and political phenomena, they tend to grope for certainty by turning to moralistic explanations. Once history was largely explained as the consequence of "good" and "bad" kings, and now an equally unsophisticated approach relates insurrections to the existence of "good" or "bad" governments. This mor…

👍18👎1

19 Oct 2026, 09:42 UTC≈5,150 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📍 برای آشنایی بیشتر با محتوای این جلسات، می‌توانید اینجا کلیک کنید. ✍️ جلسات این دوره، از پنج‌شنبه، ۳۰ مهرماه (همین هفته‌ی جاری) آغاز می‌شود. برای ثبت‌نام و حضور در این چهار جلسه می‌توانید با ادمین موسسه: @Sayesarveazad تماس بگیرید. پنج‌شنبه‌ها از ساعت ۱۴ تا ۱۶ نیاوران، خیابان امیدوار، پلاک ۲۳ کانال «مجمع دیوانگان» @DivaneSara .

👍8

16 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTC≈3,660 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

✍️ این مجموعه برای چهار جلسه طراحی شده که هر جلسه به مرور تحولات سیاسی و اجتماعی کشور در طول یک دهه از دریچه‌ی یکی از رمان‌های «حسین سناپور» می‌پردازد. 📍 جلسه‌ی نخست: «عصر طغیان»؛ بازخوانی دهه‌ی هفتاد، از دریچه‌ی رمان «نیمه‌ی غایب». بزنگاه زاده شدن جنبش اصلاحات و نمایش امیدِ اولیه و چشم‌اندازِ خوش‌بینانه جامعه به آرمان‌های آن جنبش. 📍 جلسه‌ی دوم، «عصر تردید»، دهه‌ی هشتاد، با رمان‌های «ویران می‌آیی» و «دود». دهه‌ای ک…

👍31

10 Oct 2026, 15:39 UTC≈4,260 views49 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

✍️ آرمان امیری @armanparian - فایل پیوست، گفتار کوتاهی است با عنوان «در دفاع از ادبیات». این گفتار، بخش دوم صحبت‌های من در جلسه‌ی نقد و بررسی کتاب «وقتی گنجشک‌ها مضطرب می‌شوند» است که روز جمعه‌ (هفدهم مهرماه) برگزار شد. بخش اول صحبت‌ها نیز به گفتار مفصل‌تری با عنوان «در تمایز میان ادبیات و پروپاگاندا» اختصاص داشت که حدودا ۴۰ دقیقه طول کشید. فایل صوتی بخش اول را از اینجا و متن مکتوب آن را هم از اینجا می‌توانید دری…

👍47👎2

10 Oct 2026, 06:30 UTC≈3,720 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

✍️ آرمان امیری @armanparian - متن پیوست، یادداشتی است با عنوان «در تمایز میان ادبیات و پروپاگاندا» که در جلسه‌ی نقد و بررسی کتاب «وقتی گنجشک‌ها مضطرب می‌شوند» ارائه شد. فایل صوتی این اجرا را هم می‌توانید از اینجا بشنوید. کانال «مجمع دیوانگان» @DivaneSara .

👍25👎2

10 Oct 2026, 06:29 UTC≈3,550 views38 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

✍️ آرمان امیری @armanparian - فایل صوتی پیوست، اجرای گفتاری است با عنوان «در تمایز میان ادبیات و پروپاگاندا» که در جلسه‌ی نقد و بررسی کتاب «وقتی گنجشک‌ها مضطرب می‌شوند» ارائه شد. نسخه‌ی مکتوب این یادداشت را نیز می‌توانید از کانال دریافت کنید. کانال «مجمع دیوانگان» @DivaneSara .

👍36👎2

4 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC≈4,110 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @agarpubPhoto

نشر اگر با همکاری کتابفروشی چشمه کارگر برگزار می‌کند: گفت‌وگوی گروهی درباره‌ی کتاب «وقتی گنجشک‌ها مضطرب می‌شوند: روزنوشت‌هایی از تهران در جنگ ۴۰ روزه»، نوشته‌ی علی‌اصغر سیدآبادی. در این نشست آرمان امیری (نویسنده)، امیلی امرایی (مترجم و روزنامه‌نگار)، نسیم مرعشی (نویسنده) و محمود فرجامی (نویسنده و روزنامه‌نگار)، همراه با نویسنده‌ی کتاب، درباره‌ی این اثر سخن می‌گویند. جمعه ۱۷ مهر ۱۴۰۵، ساعت ۱۶ کتابفروشی چشمه کارگر خ…

👍21👎7

4 Sept 2026, 09:52 UTC≈5,040 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ZeroRooPodcastFile

شماره ۳۳: ایرانیان و تمنای دولت مقتدر مدرن | آرمان امیری محورها: موضع پادکست زیرورو؛ ایران، ایرانیت و دولت ایرانی؛ مقاله «زالوهای مکنده»؛ صفویه و تغییر ساختار قدرت؛ ایجاد بوروکراسی در عصر پهلوی؛ اصلاحات ارضی و جراحی ساختار؛ بوروکراسی‌زدایی و موازی‌سازی در جمهوری اسلامی و ایجاد «خودی» و «غیرخودی»؛ جامعه قوی و دولت ضعیف؛ نظریه ایرانشهری؛ فرهنگ، هویت و دغدغه‌های ایرانیان؛ مهدویت ایرانی؛ پروژه رضاشاه: دولت‌سازی، نه ملت‌…

👍29👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @divanesara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مجمع دیوانگان” (@divanesara), 13,595 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/divanesara.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.