10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,545–25,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:44
25,573
-12
12 Aug 2026, 09:25
25,585
-19
11 Aug 2026, 12:34
25,604
-22
10 Aug 2026, 16:07
25,626
-32
9 Aug 2026, 17:51
25,658
-21
8 Aug 2026, 20:52
25,679
-29
7 Aug 2026, 17:49
25,708
-48
6 Aug 2026, 16:10
25,756
-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:01
25,759
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:59
25,759
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.99%
avg views ÷ 25,573 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
29 (2 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
37,000
Reactions total
2,191
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,090
Videos
≈789
Links
≈798
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 40s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,191 reactions across 29 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,126
51.4%
🥰
192
8.76%
❤🔥
151
6.89%
💋
147
6.71%
🔥
135
6.16%
👍
134
6.12%
🎉
118
5.39%
🤩
65
2.97%
💘
53
2.42%
🤗
33
1.51%
🍾
17
0.776%
😍
11
0.502%
💯
6
0.274%
🕊
2
0.091%
🎄
1
0.046%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как использовать розовую пудру Skin Cult Rose? 🌷
Показываем удобную комплектацию нашего нового бьюти-фаворита
Наносите продукт на всё лицо для лёгкого эффекта мягкого фокуса и свежего сияния, используйте для фиксации консилера под глазами или добавляйте в макияж в качестве финального штриха.
А за сохранность отвечает надежная упаковка c cифтером!
Уже успели попробовать новинку?
Посвятим этот день нашему фирменному розовому акценту — новой любимой пудре Skin Cult Rose 🩷
Skin Cult Rose — это лёгкая рассыпчатая пудра с нежным розовым оттенком, которая стала воплощением нашей эстетики.
Она создаёт тончайшую вуаль с деликатным свечением, визуально выравнивает кожу и добавляет эффект мягкого фокуса.
🖇Совет Divage
Попробуйте использовать пудру не только для фиксации всего макияжа, но и для зон…
Решили вдохновиться магией оттенков и воплотили макияж, вдохновившись мультфильмом Винкс ✨
Тёплые оттенки палетки Terra, мягкие переливы и гармоничные сочетания помогают создать лёгкий, женственный и наполненный природной магией образ.
Сохраняйте идею для своего следующего бьюти-перевоплощения 🌷
А какая фея Винкс была у вас в любимчиках?
OZON l WB l Золотое Яблоко l Яндекс Маркет
Когда красота встречается со вкусом 🤩
Дорогие, напоминаем, что мы создали кое-что совершенно особенное совместно с сетью итальянских ресторанов Bocconcino
💜Зарегистрируйся в новом приложении Bocconcino и получи 1000 приветственных баллов.
💜Собери заказ на сумму от 3000 рублей.
💜Введи промокод Divage при оформлении.
💜Получи два полноразмерных продукта Divage — румяна Bouncy Blush и увлажняющий бальзам Swipe & Go …
Макияж, в котором всё на своём месте 💐
Палетка теней Your Eye Diary отвечает за выразительный взгляд, а компактный скульптор помогает подчеркнуть черты лица и добавить образу завершённости.
Смотри, как оттенки работают вместе!
Приобрести продукт: OZON l WB l Золотое Яблоко l Яндекс Маркет 💛
Новая русская эстетика, запечатленная в помаде 💋
Помада KRASA — это сочетание выразительного цвета, комфортной текстуры и красоты.
При создании мы вдохновлялись русскими традициями и отразили в помаде силу и глубину прекрасной русской женщины.
Плотный оттенок с первого нанесения, мягкое нанесение и насыщенный финиш превращают макияж губ в главный акцент образа.
OZON l WB l Золотое Яблоко l Яндекс Маркет
Розовый, который умеет удивлять 💗
Смотри, как яркие оттенки Easy Nude Cherry раскрываются в макияже: насыщенные розовые цвета, красивые контрасты и выразительный взгляд.
Сохраняй идею, если давно хотела попробовать что-то ярче привычного нюда ✨
OZON l WB l ЗЯ
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Акцент на глаза или губы? Вот в чём вопрос 💖
На мероприятии Divage × Bocconcino спросили блогеров об их бьюти-предпочтениях и собрали самые интересные ответы.
Идеальное сочетание для губ найдено ❤️
На случай, если в течение недели хочется попробовать новые образы, мы создали вариации лип-комбо c нашими новинками и бестселлерами на разный случай и повод.
💥Elixir Lip Oil тон 06 + Lets Talk тон 13
💥Lip Crayon тон 05 + Way To Glow тон 04
Какая пара понравилась больше?
Все продукты доступны к заказу по ссылкам: OZON l WB l ЗЯ
Напоминаем, что лимитированная коллекция тушей KRASA доступна на любимых маркетплейсах ✨
Выбирайте свой эффект: объём для выразительного взгляда или удлинение для красивых, разделённых ресниц.
Комфортная формула, насыщенный оттенок и эффектный результат — всё, что нужно для идеального макияжа глаз!
Заказывайте новинки там, где удобно именно вам, и знакомьтесь с тушами KRASA уже сегодня.
OZON l WB l Золотое Яб…
❤40🔥19💋18🤗6😍2🍾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @divagerussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 206,872 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MIXIT.RU @mixit_mood · 589,455 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 12 August 2026
Food.ru | Рецепты и советы @foodrumedia · 153,617 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Divage” (@divagerussia), 25,573 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/divagerussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.