Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ☽𝔻𝕚'𝕤 𝕊𝕜𝕖𝕥𝕔𝕙 ℂ𝕠𝕣𝕟𝕖𝕣☾

Channel

☽𝔻𝕚'𝕤 𝕊𝕜𝕖𝕥𝕔𝕙 ℂ𝕠𝕣𝕟𝕖𝕣☾

@dissketchcorner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

258subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002540721752
TypeChannel
Username@dissketchcorner
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dissketchcorner

Growth

243258250.57 August 2026 — 243 subscribers8 August 2026 — 243 subscribers16 August 2026 — 250 subscribers22 August 2026 — 258 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241–260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 18:08258+8
16 Aug 2026, 05:45250+7
8 Aug 2026, 09:46243no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:23243first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.8%
avg views ÷ 258 subscribers
Avg views / post
211
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,801
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

197 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘3819.3%
3216.2%
🔥2010.2%
custom 5258185249103312168178.63%
custom 5258245524674347164178.63%
custom 5260696293142986143157.61%
custom 5280710454195289180147.11%
❤‍🔥126.09%
🥰115.58%
custom 528301351444365452473.55%
custom 528063427436035999842.03%
custom 526032476129201111831.52%
💋31.52%
🍓10.508%
😍10.508%
😎10.508%
🤯10.508%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dissketchcorner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC83 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С любимым суши готовим)

2

5 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC102 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ебать, у меня видео залетело😨 (Для меня 5000 просмотров и 350 лайков уже победа)

💘8😎1custom 52606962931429861431

5 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC106 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я проебалась, ну скорее мы с заказчицей. Мне написали «Французский сель и Кладрубская», я сразу восприняла вороную за француза, потому что другие масти этой породы встречаются редко, а Кладрубскую за соловую. Но оказывается не Французский сель, а Французский РЫСАК. Это изменило картину, и теперь мне нужно перерисовывать голову... Хорошо что заметили вовремя... Вот какие ситуации прикольные случаются с этим артом(я у

6🤯1

5 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC104 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Я буду хайпиться на этом арте столько, пока мне самой не надоест. У меня с этим артом возникло множество проблем(которые я преодолела) и хороших воспоминаний. За счёт этого хочу передать свои эмоции Видео уже можно посмотреть в тик токе, спасибо за идею Шакире

custom 525824552467434716453🍓1custom 52581852491033121681

5 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC278 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Красота такая, все же я умею рисовать серых и вороных лошадей. Но меня еще ждет серая в яблоко…(другой отдельный заказ) вот там нужно будет запариться

💘9custom 52830135144436545244custom 52806342743603599982custom 52807104541952891801

5 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC259 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это сильно

9custom 52606962931429861433custom 52581852491033121681custom 52806342743603599981custom 52807104541952891801custom 52830135144436545241

2 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC143 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое сообщение! а я знаю кто это выставлял но яж не туп туп если нарисуешь бесплатный арт на твой вкус то расскажу и скину кто ——— Даже сюда выложу, как детки не умеют оценивать чужой труд и хотят все за бесплатно)

❤‍🔥41

2 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC196 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 Ребята, кто-то выставил этот пост без водяных знаков в каком-то ТГК. Он был продан другому человеку из ВК, что видно на скриншоте перевода денежных средств. Подделка без основных цветов адопта (цветовой палитры) Прошу, если кто-то видел ТГК, где выставляют на продажу типо мои арты, сообщите мне, пожалуйста. Мы обнаружили это с Фиас совершенно случайно, только она не была подписана и потеряла этот ТГК @dev

custom 52582455246743471644

2 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC149 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Едем домой

custom 52606962931429861438❤‍🔥2💘2

2 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC140 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

1.7/4 заказов выполнены. Перехожу к эскизу второго арта, а затем сделаю эскиз третьего

🔥7💘3custom 52830135144436545242

1 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC152 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Эти люди — скаммеры и мошенники, не ведитесь, пожалуйста. Особенно у тех, у кого айфон. Они просят выйти из айклауда на 2 минуты и зайти на чужой. После воруют ваши данные

31 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC310 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сделала коммишку для Кота

🥰7custom 52606962931429861432💘1custom 52581852491033121681custom 52806342743603599981

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dissketchcorner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“☽𝔻𝕚'𝕤 𝕊𝕜𝕖𝕥𝕔𝕙 ℂ𝕠𝕣𝕟𝕖𝕣☾” (@dissketchcorner), 258 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dissketchcorner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.