Channel
@disgustingpervert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
97subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002871079922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @disgustingpervert |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/disgustingpervert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 97 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 97 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 958 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5386748622593366965 | 49 | 67.1% | |
| custom 5197314159380828481 | 24 | 32.9% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
How did chikatilo marry such an ugly woman? Never looked deep into his biography but I cannot imagine there being anything justifying how much she obliterated their childrens chances to be good-looking
custom 51973141593808284815
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53867486225933669653
I'm a hamster in a wheel and I'm running running running
I was friends with a couple of people who had an acquaintance which had passed away, time to time they would remember him and bring him up in their blogs grieving him It would always make me mad, I don't know maybe I just have a crude way of thinking about things but it never felt right to me you barely knew him and now that he's dead you complain about it? Why are you treating it as Your traumatic experience? It …
custom 53867486225933669655
I woke up and did nothing I was thinking about the possible aftermath of my death, it all sucks and I better stay alive
Today was a boring day
I miss my friend, I hope he's alright I won't ask of course. I don't want to pester him so all I can do is hope and pray
custom 51973141593808284813
I was coloring this fish all smug thinking "heh it will be so satisfying to rewatch". I forgot to turn it back I forgot and it's probably the biggest chunk missing, I can't do anything right for God's sake
custom 51973141593808284815
Speedpaint but I keep forgetting to turn it back on
custom 53867486225933669653custom 51973141593808284812
I start typing like a retard when I'm thinking about something
I don't hate humanity I'm not a misanthrope, I just wish things were simpler More you think about societal norms and rules how to behave correctly, more you think about how to satisfy people that contradict themselves all the time more confused you get Most of incorrect and shameful behaviors are in fact really normal, they are just icky to the most because it's what they heard while growing up... we're,like, brainwa…
custom 51973141593808284812custom 53867486225933669652
All these mental illnesses too, aside from depression in more intelligent species they happen to animals only when they're put in living conditions similar to ours or if humans bred them specifically to have immense attachments like we have (zoochosis and separation anxiety in dogs). No other animal is getting harassed because he's ND, and they especially don't have disorders like schizophrenia It feels like we are o…
custom 53867486225933669655
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @disgustingpervert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 555,337 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Degrad64” (@disgustingpervert), 97 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/disgustingpervert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.