Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Открытия

@disc_over

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

545subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001232443717
TypeChannel
Username@disc_over
DescriptionСобираю сюда музыкальные, визуальные, книжные и прочие открытия. Делюсь тем, что мне показалось интересным. Мои странички: https://abesmon.syrupmg.ru Донаты сюда: https://boosty.to/smgbuddies/donate
Created29 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/disc_over

Growth

5457 Aug 2026, 10:00 — 545 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:02 — 545 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:007 Aug 2026, 11:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 544–546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 11:02545no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:00545first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.1%
avg views ÷ 545 subscribers
Avg views / post
142
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (15 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,567
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,330
Videos
351
Links
914

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3041.7%
👍1419.4%
🔥1216.7%
😁912.5%
🥰45.56%
💯22.78%
🤯11.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC54 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне сегодня прислали картинку про насекомое, которое, якобы, названо "Фигня Мелкая" Это настолько глупо и нелепо, что я не поверил. Пошел гуглить и, о боже, какой айсберг я раскопал Короче, Fignya Melkaya реально существует и еще у того же исследователя есть другое смешное именование "Barabashka Melkaya" Оказалось, что у энтомологов это что-то типа локального спорта. Они соревнуются кто придумает бОльший прикол сл

😁52🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC122 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

все так, все так. ИИ нужен для того, чтобы делать работу, которая никому не нужна (кроме одного человека со странностями) и которую никто никогда бы не стал делать, если бы не ИИ

6😁2💯1

31 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC116 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @markovdrankthechainsPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4

22 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC173 viewsread 7 August 2026

Однако, бомбить датацентры я все еще считаю - плохая затея

22 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC162 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @denissexyPhoto

Окей, заполняем форму и отправляем в личку Юду

21 Jul 2026, 19:30 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

умный человек в очках объясняет то, о чем я говорил про искусство. Он это делает в разрезе к рекламе и инфлюэнсерским механизмам всяким, но суть не меняется. Механизм один и тот же. Там тоже про ИИ. Про то что в конечном счете со всей этой ИИфикацией, если согласиться на "мне не важно кто, главное что приятно уху/глазу". То мы останемся не с настоящим, а с ФУНКЦИЕЙ, которая просто стремится модулировать наше эмоцион

3

19 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @seeallochnaya

Две новости в утро воскресенья, 2026-й год: 1. Huggingface, платформа для загрузки моделей и датасетов + тренировки, раскрыли, что недавно подверглись атаке на инфраструктуру. Эта атака отличалась от предыдущих одним свойством: она была произведена автономной системой ИИ-агентов от начала и до конца. В результате атаки серьезного урона, по их оценкам, нет, но атакующие получили доступ к ограниченному набору внутрен

19 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC143 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

проблема ИИ контента не в том, что там использовался ИИ, а в том, что если бы не ИИ контент этот бы не существовал. Ведь у автора недостаточно вовлеченности, чтобы сделать это руками. То есть автору недостаточно неплевать. В итоге получается что ИИ множит вещи, которые просто не должны существовать в обычном мире. множит вещи, которые в обычном мире никому не нужны Но в то же время делает эти вещи очень приятными дл

👍7

16 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC167 viewsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня на ютубе наткнулся на какую-то глупенькую игру про гольф/бильярд где вместо шарика - квадратный мем с котом Это звучит тупо, но, DAaaaaAmn! какой же там крутецкий саундтрек! Все бегом слушать: https://sh2k.bandcamp.com/album/uncanny-cat-golf-original-soundtrack игра, кстати бесплатная: https://slappyhappy2000.itch.io/uncanny-cat-golf

16 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC188 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/bzpO5l62Mi4 УРА! УРА! УРА! Об этом говорят!!! Успех это НЕ ДЛЯ ВСЕХ. Успех это сочетание "хорошей крови" и удачных стечений обстоятельств. КУЛЬТУРА НАС ВСЕХ ОБМАНУЛА >:C Даже если очень много стараться, вообще не факт что ты станешь успешным ;((( p.s. ну и западный мотив "исправления" мира это тоже ДАААА. Мне очень интересно было заметить эту разницу в западной и восточной культуре. Я в последние п

1👍1

15 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC135 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NeuralShitVideo

Листал тут твиттор и наткнулся на пост, в котором какой-то чувак кичится "первым успешным воздушным сбитием летающей моли автономным микродроном". Пошёл в профиль посмотреть чо за тип. Оказалось, это французский инженер и у него с корешем есть целый стартап Tornyol, который даже прошел через Y Combinator. И цель у них ни много ни мало — полное истребление комаров в городах. Специально для комаринного геноцида они р

2😁2

6 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC200 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://sabaudia.bandcamp.com/track/if-you-see-me-use-ubuntu-too-late-ive-already-deleted-windows интернет и алгоритмы потихоньку расшатывают окно овертона, чтобы обратить меня в линуксоида (а я эти побеги пускаю в вас)

🥰4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @disc_over. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Открытия” (@disc_over), 545 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/disc_over.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.