Channel
@din_nasixatdur
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
673subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001089139545 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @din_nasixatdur |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/din_nasixatdur |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 673 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 674 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 675 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 675 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
373 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 175 | 46.9% | |
| ❤ | 137 | 36.7% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 8.31% | |
| 😢 | 24 | 6.43% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.268% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2024 to 25 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Har birimizning hayotimizda bir marta bo‘lsa-da, barcha ishlar boshi berk ko‘chaga kirib qolgan. O‘shanda endi najot yo‘q deb o‘ylaganmiz, hayotimiz davom etsa-da, endi unda na ma’no va na maqsad qoldi deb hisoblaganmiz. So‘ngra kunlar aylanib, o‘sha to‘siqlar ham yo‘qolgan, g‘am-g‘ussalar bizni tark etgan… Buni izohlaydigan yagona sabab – biz tark qilsak ham, bizni tark qilmaydigan, Undan o’zgalarning eshigini taqil…
❤10👍9🔥1😢1
"Кимки Аллоҳ таолонинг буюклиги, қудрати, махлуқотлари ва еру-осмонлари ҳақида тафаккур қилишга ўзини одатлантирса, бу унинг учун энг лаззатли неъматга айланади". Имом Ғаззолий роҳимаҳуллоҳ @din_nasixatdur
❤19🔥4
Никоҳ — бу ҳиссиётга берилиб, ҳар жабҳада “бахтли интиҳо” билан тугаши кутиладиган романтик ҳикоя эмас. Никоҳ — залворли лекин муқаддас бир аҳдлашувдир. Аввало динда муқаддас, кейин эса жамиятда эътироф этилган бир масъулиятдир. Бу йўлни фақат қалбида масъулият туйғуси бор инсонлар босиб ўта олади. Аёл турмушга чиққанида аёллигини йўқотмайди. Лекин “мен!” деган кибрни тарк қилиб, сукунат ва мулойимликни танлаши кер…
👍15❤3🔥3
Дадам раҳматлининг 24 та неваралари бор. Қарийб ҳаммаси ҳофизи Каломуллоҳ. Ҳозир онам айтиб қолдилар: "Даданг вафотларидан кейин невараларимиз ҳар ҳафта Қуръонни бир бор хатм қилишяпти. Бу ҳафта 199 хатмни тугатишибди". Тасаввур қиляпсизми, дадам раҳматлига атаб неваралар шунча марта хатм қилишибди. Аллоҳ қабул қилсин! Бир ҳарфи учун ўн савоб бериладиган Қуръоннинг шунча хатми қанча савоб бўлишини бир ҳисоблаб кўрин…
👍10❤6😢4
Бу улуғ кечаларда айтиладиган энг афзал дуо: "Аллоҳумма иннака афуввун туҳиббул афва фаъфу анний". Маъноси: «Раббим, Сен кечирувчи Зотсан, кечиришни яхши кўрасан, мени (бизни) кечир». @din_nasixatdur
❤6👍3
ДЎСТ Бир киши машҳур наҳв олими Мубарридга шундай деди: -Фалончи мени ҳақорат қилди, мен эса сабр қилдим ва жим турдим. Кейин у сени ҳақорат қилди, мен эса сени ўзим билан тенг кўриб, яна жим турдим! Мубаррид унга жавоб берди: -Бу икки ҳолат бир хил эмас. Сен ўзингга етган озорга сабр қилсанг, бу ҳилм (юмшоқлик)дир. Аммо дўстингга етган озорга сабр қилсанг, бу хиёнатдир! Ким дўстининг қалбида бўлса, у ўша е…
❤10👍3
РАШК Аллоҳ таоло бизга ҳадяларни гоҳида биз уларни англамайдиган суратда юборади. Сабаби, бизнинг фикримиз ожиз, назаримиз чекланган… Бизга гоҳида неъмат бало кўринишида, берилиш эса ман қилиниш шаклида, тиклаш эса синиш кўринишида келади… Қачонки фаҳмингиз мукаммал бўлса Аллоҳнинг сизга ўзингиздан ҳам меҳрибон эканлигини англайсиз. Чунки яхшиликларнинг Роббиси фақат яхшиликлар беради-да! Абдуллоҳ ибн А…
❤9👍4
ИШОНИБ БЎЛМАЙДИ! Ҳамма билан дўст бўлиб кетаверадиган кишига ишониб бўлмайди… Сирни очадиганларга ишониб бўлмайди… Яхшиликни билмайдиган нонкўрларга ишониб бўлмайди… Қалбни синдирадиганларга ишониб бўлмайди… Фақат бўш вақтидагина олдингизга келадиганларга ишониб бўлмайди… Юқоридагилардан эҳтиёт бўлмасангиз сизга ҳам ишониб бўлмайди!!! Abdulqodir Samarqandiy @din_nasixatdur
👍6❤3
Шароитга қараб эмас, ҳар қандай шароитда сиз билан бўлганлар вафодордир!!! Abdulqodir Samarqandiy @din_nasixatdur
👍14❤9😱1
Бахтиёр эканингни кўрсатишга, исботлашга уринган кунинг бахтсизлик кунингдир. Said Komil @din_nasixatdur
😢6❤3👍2🔥2
Ўлим тугата олмайдиган алоқаларни хиёнат тугатади. Бу ҳаётда кишилар фақатгина ажралиш учун учрашишади. Ҳаётнинг энг гўзал сифати, у ҳеч нарсага қарамасдан давом этади! @din_nasixatdur
❤6👍5
РАҲМАТ Раҳматни яратди. Уни юз қисмга бўлди. Шу юз қисмдан бир қисмини ерга туширди. Ердаги махлуқотлар, инсонлар, жинлар, ҳайвонлар ана шу бир қисм билан бир бирига раҳм қилади. Тўқсон тўққиз қисмини Ўзининг ҳузурида олиб қолди. Қиёмат куни бандаларига ана шу тўқсон тўққиз қисми ила раҳм қилади....! Роббимиз ҳақида гапирдим дўстлар....! Abdulqodir Samarqandiy @din_nasixatdur
👍12❤8🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @din_nasixatdur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 696,205 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«Дин насиҳатдур»” (@din_nasixatdur), 673 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/din_nasixatdur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.