"Tarjimada adashib qoldim" Postning audio versiyasi. 🔊 Ovoz AI orqali ovozlashtirildi @dilmurad_me

Channel
dilmurad.me
@dilmurad_me
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
502subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001658185888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dilmurad_me |
| Description | Dilmurod Yusupovning inklyuziyaga oid mualliflik blogi / Авторский блог Дильмурада Юсупова об инклюзии. 🌐 https://dilmurad.me/ 📩 @d_yusupov 🍩 https://tirikchilik.uz/dilmurad_me |
| Created | 11 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dilmurad_me |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 502 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 502 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 117.4%
- avg views ÷ 502 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 589
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.55%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (26 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,125 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 524
- Videos
- 63
- Links
- 721
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 47 | 62.7% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 13.3% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Tarjimada adashib qoldim Inklyuziv amaliyotlar mavzusida Gyote-Instituti tomonidan tashkil etilgan birinchi seminar 30-iyul kuni bo‘lib o‘tdi. Hamkasbim Abdulaziz Salimov raqamli sharoitlar (digital accessibility) haqida taqdimot qildilar. 🔗 Taqdimot bilan shu havola orqali tanishsangiz bo‘ladi: https://wcag.uz/presentation#slide-1 E'tiborimni bir narsa tortdi. Ingliz tilidagi digital accessibility tushunchasi rus…
❤3
📺 O‘tgan hafta O‘zbekiston 24 telekanalida nogironligi bo‘lgan shaxslarni bandligini ta’minlash mavzusida maxsus reportaj qilinibdi. ishplus.uz — nogironligi bor shaxslar uchun maxsus rekruting veb-portalimiz haqida ham aytilgan ekan. Lekin loyiha natijalari raqamlarida ozgina ko‘paytirib yozib yuborishibdi. Aniq raqamlarni shu yerda yozib qoldiraman: 2718 ta — ro‘yxatdan o‘tgan ish beruvchilar 3112 ta — e’lon qi…
👍5
Har qanday jamoat tadbiriga ro‘yxatdan o‘tish jarayonida, ishtirok etuvchilardan ularga qanday oqilona qulaylik yoki sharoitlar kerakligini so‘rash — rivojlangan davlatlarda odatiy holga aylangan. Gyote-Instituti so‘rovnomasida ham shunday savol berishgan ekan. ❓Onlayn va oflayn tadbirlarda ishtirok etishingiz uchun maxsus sharoitlar yoki yordam kerak bo‘lsa, iltimos, belgilang: • Onlayn va oflayn tadbirlar uchun s…
❤3
Salom hammaga! 🇩🇪🇺🇿 30-iyul — 4-sentyabr kunlari Gyote-Instituti O’zbekistondagi madaniyat menejerlari va kreativ soha vakillari uchun inklyuziv amaliyotlar bo‘yicha onlayn va offlayn seminarlarni tashkil etyapti. 🖥 Raqamli sharoitlar mavzusidagi birinchi seminarni 30-iyul hamkasbim Abdulaziz Salimov boshlab beradi. Boshqa seminarlarga inklyuziya sohasidagi mahalliy ekspert-hamkasblarim jalb qilinadi. Men ham 26-av…
👏3
Yaqinda bandlikka oid yana bir muhim tadqiqot natijalari e’lon qilingan edi. Gazeta.uz da o‘qib ulgurishga imkoniyatim bo‘lmadi — chunki shu mavzuga oid mahalliy OAVdagi maqolalar o‘chirtirilgan. Keyin nega so‘z erkinligi indeksida shunchalik pasayib ketyapmiz degan savollarni bermanglar o‘rtoq amaldorlar! Bu tadqiqot haqidagi Internetda qolib ketgan ayrim ma'lumotlar asosida Komil aka Jalilov yozib chiqibdilar. Amm…
🔥4
Haq olinur, berilmas! Andijon viloyati Xo‘jaobod tumanida II guruh nogironligi bo‘lgan Gulnoraxon Omonova o‘zining roziligi va xabarisiz “Ravnaq Tex” MCHJ tikuv sexiga ishga joylashtirib qo‘yilgani aniqlandi. Oqibatda ota uyida I guruh nogironligi bo‘lgan 12 yoshli qizini parvarish qilayotgan ayol “Kambag‘allik reyestri”dan chiqarilib, davlat nafaqasidan mahrum bo‘ldi. Ayol bu mashmashalardan oradan besh oy o‘tgach…
🔥3👍1
Avvalgi postimda aholini ro‘yxatga olish jarayonida nechta kishi O‘zbek imo-ishora tilini ona tili sifatida ko‘rsatganini bilish maqsadida Statistika qo‘mitasiga murojaat qilaman degan edim. Shunday javob keldi: Sizning O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Milliy statistika qo‘mitasiga murojaat.gov.uz orqali kelib tushgan 2026-yil 10-iyuldagi 252322-r/26-sonli murojaatingizga javoban quyidagilarni ma’lum qilamiz. Murojaatingi…
🔥3👍2
👩🏻🦽🏫 Inklyuziv ta’lim kimga kerak? Shu savol yana qizg‘in muhokamalarga sabab bo‘lmoqda 🇺🇿 Yaqinda O‘zbekiston Xalq demokratik partiyasi (XDP) tomonidan tashkil etilayotgan “Munozara maydoni” klubida “Nogironligi bo‘lgan shaxslarning to‘siqsiz harakatlanishi, infratuzilma va xizmatlardan erkin foydalanishiga to‘sqinlik qilayotgan muammolar tahlili” mavzusi atroflicha muhokama qilinibdi. 📱 Dasturning to‘liq videosi…
👍11
🇺🇿🧏🏻♀️ O‘zbek imo-ishora tili — kimning ona tili? Davlat statistika qo‘mitasi yaqinda 1989-yildan beri endi birinchi marta o‘tkazilgan aholini ro‘yxatga olish dastlabki natijalarini e’lon qilgan edi. Menga qiziq bo‘lgan joyi — mamlakatimiz aholisining 89,4 foizini o‘zbeklar tashkil etadi ekan. Aholining 35,7 mln nafari yoki 91,3 foizi esa o‘zbek tilini ona tili sifatida ko‘rsatgan ekan. Bu ko‘rsatkich etnik o‘zbekl…
👍6❤4
🇺🇿 O‘zbekistonga kelsak, bizda O‘zbek imo-ishora tili rasmiy til sifatida tan olinganligiga shubham bor va bunga bir nechta sabablarni keltirsak bo‘ladi. Jahon karlar federatsiyasi, O‘zbekiston 2020-yil "Nogironligi bo‘lgan shaxslar huquqlari to‘g‘risida"gi qonunni qabul qilib O‘zbek imo-ishora tilini tan oldi deb ma’lumot beryapti. Ammo bu yerda noaniqliklar bor. 1) O‘zbek imo-ishora tili degan tushuncha qonunimizd…
👍5❤3
🇯🇵🇵🇭Kecha Tokiodagi JETRO (Yaponiya xalqaro savdo tashkiloti) qoshida faoliyat ko‘rsatadigan Rivojlanayotgan Iqtisodiyotlar Instituti (Institute for Developing Economies - IDE) ga bordim. Filippin davlatida nogironlar huquqlariga bag‘ishlangan seminar bo‘ldi. Ko‘proq karlar huquqlari va Filippin imo-ishora tilia (FSL) haqida muhokamalar bo‘ldi. Menimcha biz uchun ham ko‘p foydali ma’lumotlar bor: 1) Filippin umumiy …
👍6❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dilmurad_me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 253,963 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Bloger_uz_24_7 · 552 postsHosiyat Falsafasi
@mhbfalsafasi · 332 postsO'zbekiston ayollar ko'zi bilan
@uzbekayol · 482 postsЧеловек на Луне
@DisabilityRightsInUzbekistan · 751 postInklyuziv uzbekiston 🇺🇿 ♿
@inklyuziv_uzbekiston · 1301 postIT help for blind
@it_help_uz · 8251 postMenSenvaUlar 2.0
@MenSenvaUlar2 · 3051 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@DisabilityRightsInUzbekistan · 752 postsEgamov Murod 🕋♿️
@Bloger_uz_24_7 · 551 postIT help for blind
@it_help_uz · 8251 postHosiyat Falsafasi
@mhbfalsafasi · 331 postsharoitplus.uz
@sharoitplus · 1,7201 postO'zbekiston ayollar ko'zi bilan
@uzbekayol · 481 postuzsd.uz channel
@uzsduz · 8611 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dilmurad.me” (@dilmurad_me), 502 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dilmurad_me.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.