Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Диктор Павел Константиновский | Запись аудиокниг

@diktor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

822subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001101417744
TypeChannel
Username@diktor
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 March 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/diktor

Growth

8228248237 Aug 2026, 20:54 — 824 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:31 — 824 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:03 — 822 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:548 Aug 2026, 15:03
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 822–824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:03822-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:31824no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:54824first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 822 subscribers
Avg views / post
147
1 post measured
Reaction rate
30.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 February 20265 August 2026)
Views total147
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

464 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21245.7%
👍12326.5%
🔥12326.5%
40.862%
😁20.431%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC147 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Итоги 👆 Я в числе 10 победителей премии Инженеры слова ✌️

🔥28👍16😁1

30 Jun 2026, 14:26 UTC448 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Радость! Озвученный мною фантастический во всех отношениях рассказ Василисы Ветровой «Благодетели» вошёл в шорт-лист премии Инженеры слова. Ждём итогов :)

🔥35👍81😁1

11 Jun 2026, 12:46 UTC563 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Коллеги из издательства Бомбора упомянули меня в своём подкасте о личном бренде диктора. Приятно! :) А вы согласны, что сегодня нужно обязательно "строить личный бренд"? Ну, чтобы, допустим, зарабатывать побольше?

26

11 Jun 2026, 12:41 UTC440 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bombora_digitalPhoto

❗️ Личный бренд, профессионализм и репутация — одно и то же? В первом выпуске 3 сезона Рита, Даша, Вера и Маша обсуждают: ❗️ что такое личный бренд диктора и из чего он складывается, ❗️ гарантирует ли известное имя качество озвучки, ❗️ что важнее в конкурентной среде: медийность или профессионализм, ❗️ что об этом всем думают актёр дубляжа Александр Гаврилин и основатель студии Catcher Sound Вероника Бершадская. В

10👍2

26 May 2026, 16:54 UTC510 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не хотел хвастаться, а придется) Но если серьёзно, я никогда не угадываю. Как говорила великолепный педагог по речи Анна Бруссер, читать нужно головой. Так и я. Я работаю не с напечатанными словами, а с вложенным смыслом, контекстом, подтекстом, авторской задачей. Отсюда это самое угадывание) Поэтому, когда ищете исполнителя и записываете пробу, в первую очередь слушайте как диктор считывает смысл, а не как глубоко

🔥2111👍6

7 May 2026, 06:38 UTC612 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фото времён, когда не было соцсетей, мессенджеров и видеохостингов, а люди слушали и слышали радио. Это было хорошее время. Сейчас тоже хорошее, но вы ж понимаете - «раньше было лучше» :) Я уже давно не работаю в эфире, но именно благодаря радио я стал неплохим исполнителем аудиокниг. С Днём радио, дорогие слушатели! ❤️

33👍11🔥6

26 Apr 2026, 07:25 UTC671 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня в чате коллег снова возникла тема обработки звука, использования музыки и эффектов в аудиокнигах. Я разродился комментарием, который до того мне самому понравился😁 что привожу его тут полностью: «Я вообще работу с аудиокнигами всегда стараюсь экстраполировать на рассказ истории человека человеку. Во всех аспектах. И в громкости, в динамике, в обработке, самом звуке, в моём отношении к звукам, музыке и эффек

22👍192

13 Apr 2026, 09:25 UTC699 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Моя коллега Марина Даринова побывала на книжной выставке с рабочими целями и поделилась выводами. 👆 Они, кстати, пересекаются с моим опытом практически 1:1. А вы на книжных выставках ищете издателей? Какой опыт у вас?

🔥6👍5

13 Apr 2026, 09:25 UTC625 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Некоторые выводы, ошибки, полезности. 1) Выставки посещать обязательно . Чтобы правильно распределить время нужно заранее ознакомиться с программой, площадками выступлениями! 2) Последний день выставки, тем более после обеда , самый невыгодный с точки зрения нахождения там специалистов. В основном там продавцы, а нам нужны менеджеры и люди, которые отвечают за общение с авторами и чтецами . И действительно, ко

👍106🔥2

23 Mar 2026, 09:47 UTC558 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кстати, вот он :) Обсуждать можно всё по теме + умеренный флуд https://t.me/diktorschat

👍5

23 Mar 2026, 09:46 UTC561 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Куда перенесём чат авторов и дикторов? Можно выбрать несколько вариантов.

  1. ВК35%
  2. Макс16%
  3. Оставим здесь68%
  4. Мне чат не нужен4%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Mar 2026, 04:29 UTC690 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Размышления о радиоспектаклях Друзья! Надеюсь, вы посмотрели документальный фильм Радиодетство из этого поста. Если нет, обязательно посмотрите, потому что словами очень сложно объяснить, почему я не берусь создавать аудиоспектакли и многоголосные аудиокниги, работая в удалённой студии. Хотя такие запросы приходят очень-очень часто. Я хорошо понимаю тех авторов, кто хочет выделиться среди коллег более сложной мног

👍1712

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @diktor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Mar 2026, 09:46 UTCAnonymous Poll80 voters

Куда перенесём чат авторов и дикторов? Можно выбрать несколько вариантов.

  1. ВК35%
  2. Макс16%
  3. Оставим здесь68%
  4. Мне чат не нужен4%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Feb 2026, 15:32 UTCAnonymous Poll84 voters

Опрос для писателей на выходные! Что думаете об авторской озвучке?

  1. Мне интересна эта тема37%
  2. Уже сам(а) озвучиваю свои книги10%
  3. Чушь. Озвучкой должны заниматься профессионалы15%
  4. Выскажусь в комментариях4%
  5. Хочу посмотреть результаты35%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Диктор Павел Константиновский | Запись аудиокниг” (@diktor), 822 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diktor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.