Channel
@dikanka_e
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
458subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001837074495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dikanka_e |
| Description | الروايات وما إليها. للتواصل: @o5alds |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dikanka_e |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 458 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 458 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 867 |
| Reactions total | 195 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
289 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 163 | 56.4% | |
| 🤣 | 47 | 16.3% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 13.5% | |
| 🥴 | 23 | 7.96% | |
| 🍌 | 12 | 4.15% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.346% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هل يمكن لهذه الأصوات التي أضنته منذ برهة أكثر مما أضنته في أي وقت مضى، أن تؤثر في الآخرين هذا التأثير القوي كله؟ إذن.. إذن هو قادر على أن يصنع شيئًا في هذه الحياة! كورولنكو | الموسيقي الأعمى ١٣٤
❤9
يبدو أن ذلك الشخص يتحكم بتفاعلات القناة بشكل أو بآخر، لكن الآن بعد هذه الرسالة لن يستطيع وضع مهرج
❤13
يبدو لي أن من المتابعين من يتعمّد الاستهزاء هكذا، وأنه بشكل أو بآخر حين يضع مثل هذا التفاعل يُحسب عن ١٠ أو ١٥، لأنه في بعض المنشورات يكون التفاعل بوجه مهرج مثلًا أكثر من المشاهدات، ولكي نقطع عليه لعبته حتى يملّ ويفارقنا سأُلغي التفاعلات إلا ما فيها استحسان.. وأنا أفعل ذلك لأن ثلاثة من المتابعين الكرام تأذوا منها، أما أنا فلا آبه بمن يشتمني في وجهي ولا يحرّك بي ساكنًا، دعك ممن يستظرف في تفاعلات (:
🤡138
[الفرق بين الدراسة النفسية العلمية والأدب النفسي] إن من شأن النظرةِ العِلمية أن تنظُر إلى الواقع من الخارج، فترى جانبًا منه وتضع له القوانين، ولا كذلك الحدسُ الفنيّ الأدبي، فإنه يُعايِش الواقع من الداخل، ويراهُ لذلك دفعةً واحدة بكل الحياة التي تنبض فيه، الحياة الدافقة التي لا يمكن حصرها في إطار قانون عام شامل يصدق على جميع الأفراد. إن الخدي الأدبي يرى الواقع كله جملةً واحدة متداخلًا متناغمًا متشابكًا، متعدد الجوانب …
🥴23
"ما أكثر مزار تاريخي تتمنى زيارته" — "سؤال جميل ^^ على أنني لا أرى بريقًا في الآثار التاريخية القديمة كالأهرامات والكولسيوم وآثار المايا أو حتى النقوش الثمودية في جزيرة العرب، إلا أنني أودّ لو أرى آثارًا لها اتصال بي وبقراءاتي، منها: منزل دوستويفسكي، وقاعة الطعام في كنيسة سانتا ماريا في ميلانو، وقلعة ناغويا في اليابان، وهذه القلعة فتنني جمالها لأنها فيروزية السقف بيضاء الجدران. وكذلك أتمنى زيارة ياسنايا بوليانا، ضيعة…
🤡12
والجسر متى شُيّد فلا يمكنه أن يكفّ عن كونه جسرًا ما لم ينهَرْ. كافكا | الجسر
🤣26
الأشجار فرانز كافكا ترجمة: خالد نحن كجذوع الأشجار المركوزة في الثلج، تبدو منتصبةً على السطح، وأن دَفعةً واحدةً قد تُسقطها، ولكن لا، لا تستطيع فعل ذلك لأنها تضربُ بعمق في الأرض، ولكن انظُر حتى هذا وَهم!
🍌12
ويبدو أن وجوهًا كهذه لا تُرى إلا بين النساء السِلافيّات. إن قسماتها الجميلة المنسقة قد خطت خطوطًا مدورة، باردة، هادئة. والعينان الزرقاوان تنظُران إليك نظرةً هادئة. وقلما يصطبغ وجهها بالحمرة. ولكن شحوبَها ليس ذلك الشحوب العادي الذي يهم أن يلتهب في كل لحظةٍ بتأثير هوى حار عنيف. إنه أشبه ببياض الثلج البارد. وكان شعر إيليفين الأشقر، الذي يضرب إلى قليل من السواد عند صدغيها العاجيَين، يتهدّل ضفيرةً واحدةً كأنّها تشد رأسها …
🤡13
لا بدّ لقارئ الكتب المتأدب المتثقّف من أن يعرف من علوم الشريعة القدرَ الذي يُحتّمه عليه إيمانه، ليكون له حِصنًا دون ما في كتب الأدب والروايات من أخبار وفقر منحرفة. وهو قدرٌ يسير يثبّت عقيدة الإنسان علميًا. ولعلّ الروايات واضحة حين تورد مسائل في المسيحية، ولكنهم يوردون أحيانًا مسائل في القَدَر هم يعيشون في متاهة فيها، وأكثر من وجدته يُداخل بين هذه المسائل دوستويفسكي.
❤6
مقالة قصيرة في الترجمة جِاين أوستن - سعد مصلوح - الجِناس https://khalidreads.blogspot.com/2026/08/blog-post_13.html
❤3
يوكيم شخصية أخرى وليس هو الموسيقي الأعمى.
❤1
ومنذ ذلك الحين لم يصبح أحد يسمع يوكيم عازفًا على الكمان، لا في الخان، ولا في سهرات القرية. لقد علّق كمانه على مسمار في الإسطبل. حتى أنه لم يلاحِظ أن أوتار هذه الآلة التي كان يحبها في الماضي حبًّا عظيمًا أخذت تتقطع الواحد بعد الآخر، بسبب الرطوبة وانعدام العناية بها مع أنها كانت، وهي تتقطع، تصدر أصواتًا شاكية فائضة بحزن قاتل، حتى أن الخيول، كانت تصهل لسماعها صهيلَ الرحمة والشفقة، وتُدير رؤوسَها إلى سيّدِها الذي قسا قلب…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dikanka_e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
أفكر بتسجيل ما يصلح من مراجعاتي للكتب، ونشرها في قناة اليوتيوب
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أمسيات ديكانكا | خالد” (@dikanka_e), 458 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dikanka_e.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.