🇹🇷🇹🇷☀️
custom 540908224637411834612custom 530563566983239409510custom 53007822451187631068custom 53012821449522790215

Channel
@diileam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
462subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001914106865 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diileam |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diileam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 462 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 463 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:24 | 461 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 464 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 466 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 466 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
265 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5409082246374118346 | 101 | 38.1% | |
| custom 5301282144952279021 | 65 | 24.5% | |
| custom 5300782245118763106 | 50 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5305635669832394095 | 49 | 18.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @diileam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇹🇷🇹🇷☀️
custom 540908224637411834612custom 530563566983239409510custom 53007822451187631068custom 53012821449522790215
t.me/voprosy?start=an9un
custom 53056356698323940951
🤩
custom 540908224637411834625custom 530128214495227902113custom 53056356698323940959custom 53007822451187631062
📍𝐵𝑜𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑚
custom 540908224637411834632custom 530078224511876310613custom 53012821449522790219custom 53056356698323940951
если вы увидите «мою анкету» на сайтах знакомств — это не я!! на данный момент я не ищу общения/знакомства с парнями🤦♀️ пожалуйста не видитесь на эту хуйню
custom 530078224511876310615custom 530128214495227902111custom 540908224637411834611custom 53056356698323940953
я конечно понимаю,что за мной интересно наблюдать в соц.сетях,но не до такой степени,что бы создавать фейковые аккаунты в инстаграме,вк,тик токе и телеграмме🆘 на протяжение полутора года от моего имени пишут людям с угрозами,заводят какие-то интрижки,странички на сайтах знакомств и даже отношения,как я знаю.. 🤦♀️ было очень много случаев когда мне присылали анкеты с сайтов и начинали разбираться с угрозами от моег…
custom 530563566983239409521custom 530128214495227902111custom 540908224637411834610custom 53007822451187631063
☺️☺️🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 ☺️☺️☺️☺️@diileam ☺️☺️☺️ ☺️☺️☺️ @diileam ☺️☺️ @diileam ☺️БОЛЬШЕ СТРАНИЧЕК В СОЦ.СЕТЯХ У МЕНЯ НЕТ☺️
custom 54090822463741183464
обожаю аэропорты и Москву✈️ 🤍
custom 530128214495227902116custom 53007822451187631069custom 54090822463741183467custom 53056356698323940954
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @diileam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑏𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒.𝑑 🤍” (@diileam), 462 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diileam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.