2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 05:16
60
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:53
60
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.3%
avg views ÷ 60 subscribers
Avg views / post
17.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held
20 (12 May 2021 – 24 July 2026)
Views total
17
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
3
Videos
3
Links
70
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
17m 22s
Average length
8m 41s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5
62.5%
🔥
2
25.0%
❤🔥
1
12.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2021 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Здравствуйте, меня зовут Владимир и я — алкоголик вайбкодер.
Безусловно, мне нравится получать подарки, но в этот знаменательный день у меня есть подарки для вас:
• Telegram-бот, умеющий проверять ЭЦП
• Приложение для macOS, Linux, Windows, которое тоже умеет проверять ЭЦП
В чём разница? Telegram-боту файл надо отправлять через Telegram. Как долго он будет потом хранить файлы на своих серверах, неизвестно. Кому-то …
Вперёд к назаду!
С мест сообщают:
А из действительно прикольного - в ИС "Судебный кабинет" с неделю назад убрали возможность при аутентификации использовать казтокен. Только ключи в файловых хранилищах. По телефону техподдержка ответила - "мы отказались от поддержки этих устройств..."
Каким же надо быть прекрасным специалистом в сфере кибербезопасности, чтобы отказаться от использования защищённых носителей ключей …
Чуть больше года назад я рекомендовал на канале отечественный сериал «Мошенники». На подходе второй сезон, а пока почитайте ещё одно мнение о первом сезоне и не забудьте рассказать о сериале своим близким:
https://t.me/belyaevsec/4603
ВНИМАНИЕ! Видео 18+, ненормативная лексика, сцены насилия, неоднозначный юмор.
ВНИМАНИЕ! Если собираетесь посмотреть сам сериал, не смотрите это видео до просмотра сериала!
Долго думал, делиться ли этим с вами, но таки решился. Это 15-минутный отрывок из последнего эпизода второго сезона сериала The Capture.
Отличное напоминание, что информацию, полученную в электронном виде нужно обязательно перепроверять, даже е…
Проверьте свои знания об ЭЦП и электронных документах
Три года назад на одной из конференций посетителям предлагалось ответить на три вопроса на тему электронных документов и электронной цифровой подписи. Всего приняло участие 53 человека. На все вопросы правильно ответило 5 человек (менее 10%).
Мы решили задать аналогичные вопросы. Посмотрим, сильно ли изменилась ситуация?
Опрос приурочен к Digital Bridge 2025. П…
Интересно ли вам пройти небольшой опрос из трёх вопросов по теме ЭЦП? Пару лет назад на все из них смогло правильно ответить менее 10% респондентов. Тогда участие приняло 53 человека, на все вопросы верно ответило 5 человек.
Да, интересно93%
Нет, не интересно8%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Уже более полугода забываю порекомендовать посмотреть отечественный сериал Мошенники, но ситуация напомнила.
Смотрите сами, покажите близким. Особенно тем, кто постарше и помоложе.
Думаю, будет полезно посмотреть и законопослушным гражданам, и тем, кого вовлекают в мошеннические схемы в качестве исполнителей.
Полезная статья про уязвимости использования кодов подтверждения по SMS. Для тех, кто не знает английский, статья достаточно хорошо переводится через Google Переводчик.
https://blog.1password.com/what-is-sim-swapping/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @digitalhygiene. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Интересно ли вам пройти небольшой опрос из трёх вопросов по теме ЭЦП? Пару лет назад на все из них смогло правильно ответить менее 10% респондентов. Тогда участие приняло 53 человека, на все вопросы верно ответило 5 человек.
Да, интересно93%
Нет, не интересно8%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2021 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Цифровая Гигиена” (@digitalhygiene), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalhygiene.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
