Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Digital Budget 🌐

@digitalbudget

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

730subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001841567662
TypeChannel
Username@digitalbudget
DescriptionDigital Budget - измеритель затрат на интернет-рекламу. Также у нас есть продукты: Banner Stat, Marketplace Budget и Social Budget. Тут мы делимся новостями продуктов и обновлениями для клиентов. Для связи - @nemchenkoo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/digitalbudget

Growth

7306 Aug 2026, 08:18 — 730 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:12 — 730 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:186 Aug 2026, 16:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 729–731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 16:12730no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:18730first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 730 subscribers
Avg views / post
141
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held19 (29 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total703
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
276
Videos
7
Links
195

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7641.3%
7239.1%
👍2614.1%
custom 545614067402801948631.63%
10.543%
❤‍🔥10.543%
🏆10.543%
👏10.543%
🕊10.543%
😍10.543%
🤝10.543%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC79 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Синхронный рост на российском рынке зарубежной электроники: две волны — покупательская и рекламная ⚡️CDEK.Shopping сообщает: в первом полугодии 2026 г. в России оборот зарубежной электроники вырос на 6% год к году, а количество заказов увеличилось на 28%. Мы решили посмотреть, как продвигались известные иностранные бренды сегмента (Samsung, Xiaomi, Haier, Apple, Honor, Logitech, Gigabyte, Tecno, Asus, Poco) внутри к

4🔥3👍1

24 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC139 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nrf_regions_1festPhoto

Как использовать диджитал-данные конкурентов для роста собственного бизнеса? В сессии «Рецепт роста: какие диджитал-решения определяют 2026 год» Юлия Алифёрова, исполнительный директор Digital Budget, расскажет, как меняется рынок, какие сигналы помогают принимать более точные маркетинговые решения и почему анализ конкурентов становится одним из ключевых инструментов для построения эффективной стратегии. Ключевые т

🔥75😍1

21 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC160 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Двойной форсаж: у Mazda кратно растут и продажи, и рекламная активность в интернете в 1HY2026 🔣 Ранее мы писали о том, что в мае 2025 года компания «Мазда Мотор Рус» анонсировала поставки в Россию кроссоверов CX-5 и CX-50 с китайского завода бренда. В свою очередь, директор агентства «Автостат» Сергей Целиков недавно объявил в своем канале, что продажи Mazda в 1HY2026 выросли по сравнению с 1HY2025 года в 8,6 раз.

🔥53👍1

17 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC185 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Конференция RoRe Group «Код человечности»: зачем брендам доверие и как его измерить ⚡️Вчера представители Digital Budget побывали на конференции “Код человечности” от RoRe Group. Мероприятие, где выступили эксперты группы компаний «Родная Речь» и ряд их партнёров, собрало CMO, CEO и владельцев бизнеса, а также ведущих специалистов индустрии маркетинга, рекламы и технологий. 📎На конференции обсудили трансформацию ре

🔥61🤝1

14 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC140 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Наш материал в Adindex: расклад сил на рынке e-grocery за январь–май 2026 ☄️В Adindex вышел наш материал, в котором мы проанализировали расклад сил среди брендов-лидеров рынка e-grocery в условиях замедления роста отрасли. Делимся основными инсайтами. Share of Voice (SOV) 📈По данным Banner Stat, в период с января по май 2026 года по доле голоса лидирует «Пятёрочка» (29%). Вторая позиция – у «Самоката» с SOV 19,8%

🔥621👍1

9 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC191 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Новый формат рекламы в поиске Яндекса: ИИ-выдача с нативными вставками 🧬Ранее мы рассказывали, что начали мониторить ответы нейросети в поисковой выдаче Яндекса. В ходе мониторинга были зафиксированы коммерческие блоки внутри сгенерированного текста. Суть в том, что Алиса AI добавляет короткие рекламные объявления внутри своего ответа на запрос пользователя. При этом показ происходит в релевантном контексте — то ест

7🔥4👍2

7 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTC178 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Угадайте, в коллаборации с кем LADA провела акцию, описанную в посте выше⌛

  1. KHL6%
  2. Матч ТВ50%
  3. Eurosport13%
  4. РБК-Спорт6%
  5. Первый канал25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC164 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Викторина: угадай партнера LADA по самой видимой кампании бренда за 2026 ⚠️AdSignal зафиксировал запуск кампании LADA. Именно эта рекламная кампания уверенно удерживает первое место с начала 2026 года по настоящий момент как по количеству размещений, так и по потенциальной видимости (OTS) среди всех кампаний бренда. ➡️Баннеры продвигают совместную акцию LADA и одного из ее медиапартнеров. С 20 марта по 24 мая 2026

6🔥3👍2

3 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC178 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Усадка» на рынке строительства и ремонта: как крупнейшие DIY-ритейлеры адаптируют рекламные бюджеты к новым реалиям 🛠 По данным* Digital Budget, в первом квартале 2026 года расходы рекламодателей на онлайн-рекламу в категории «Товары для строительства и ремонта» сократились по сравнению с аналогичным периодом 2025 г. на 5%. В то же время, по оценкам Infoline, объем реализации DIY-ассортимента в 1Q2026 снизился на 8

5🔥4👍2

2 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC152 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ваш бренд в тексте нейро-ответа Яндекса: измеряем с помощью GPS ✔️ Еще в 2024 году Яндекс интегрировал нейро-ответ в поисковую выдачу. С тех пор формат перешел из тестового режима в полноценную составляющую поиска, и мы в Digital Budget начали мониторить нейро-ответ Яндекса, чтобы оценить текстовое присутствие брендов в нейровыдаче. 📌Для проведения такой оценки мы разработали метрику GPS (Generative Presence Share)

7🔥5custom 54561406740280194863

29 Jun 2026, 14:27 UTC188 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Digital-аналитика в рекламной вселенной: вскрываем стратегии и находим скрытые орбиты рынка 🎤С такой темой Юлия Алифёрова, исполнительный директор Digital Budget, выступила в пятницу на Adindex City Conference в секции «Полевые отчеты рекламного флота». ⬇️В ходе выступления спикер представила рынку новую метрику — Generative Presence Share (GPS), которая измеряет долю текстового присутствия рекламодателя или бренда

8🔥6👍3👏1

23 Jun 2026, 08:58 UTC247 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Делимся с вами новостями: 1⃣ В личном кабинете Digital Budget стал доступен рейтинг рекламодателей за весь 2025 год, а также за 1 квартал 2026 года. Данные можно найти на вкладке “Рейтинг рекламодателей”. ✅Пользователям предоставляются данные по объемам затрат рекламодателей на привлечение трафика на целевые сайты в разрезе четырех основных платных каналов: Banners, Paid Search, Paid Social, Online Video. Рейтинг

4👍4🔥3❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @digitalbudget. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz16 voters

Угадайте, в коллаборации с кем LADA провела акцию, описанную в посте выше⌛

  1. KHL6%
  2. Матч ТВ50%
  3. Eurosport13%
  4. РБК-Спорт6%
  5. Первый канал25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2026, 07:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz23 voters

🔍О каком сервисе доставки идёт речь в предыдущем посте:

  1. Яндекс Лавка9%
  2. Яндекс Еда13%
  3. Ozon Fresh13%
  4. Купер9%
  5. Самокат48%
  6. Grow Food9%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 587,021 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Digital Budget 🌐” (@digitalbudget), 730 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalbudget.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.