5 measurements spanning 15 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 813–822 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 17:07
814
-3
16 Aug 2026, 03:17
817
-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:51
820
-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:32
821
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:24
821
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 25 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 54s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
191 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
53
27.7%
😁
46
24.1%
🔥
45
23.6%
custom 5334957798109245314
12
6.28%
🤯
10
5.24%
👍
9
4.71%
custom 5418283509431164750
6
3.14%
🤔
5
2.62%
custom 5458694341323136053
4
2.09%
💯
1
0.524%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 25 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 18 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digital_beam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 November 2025 to 25 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вот зачем они сделали робота, который бегает по корту, как я😅
Китайцы из UBTech показали гуманоидного робота для игры в теннис. Даже в смонтированном демо робот какой-то нелепый, так что кожаные спортсмены могут спать спокойно.
Да и чего реально не хватает в теннисе - это средство для полного восстановления колен после матча, а не эти железяки 🧠
Говоря про мои успехи, продолжаю тренироваться и добавляю игровую прак…
Часто в последнее время попадается тема одиночества, причем с разных возможных сторон обсуждения. В целом логично - тема интересная и актуальная сейчас, связанная даже с теми же нейронками.
На днях посмотрел этот ролик Т-Ж про "экономику одиночества, а также новый фильм с Ченинг Татумом "Roofman". Странно, но в плане ощущений в них есть что-то общее, как раз вот на эту тему. При этом фильм хоть и очень простой, но г…
Вчера вышел финальный эпизод Очень странных дел
Мне в целом понравилось, как завершили сериал. Особенно душевной вышла финальная сцена. Однако, все равно это самый слабый сезон из всех для меня. Видимо, концовка всегда самое сложное.
Не буду расписывать какие-то детали, всё равно каждый, кто хочет, посмотрит. Со спойлерами уже можно обсудить в треде 🤩
В диснейленде появился милый робот снеговик Олаф из «Холодного сердца». Работает без оператора, может разговаривать и поддержать беседу.
Одна из моих целей на следующей год, съездить в дисней-парк в Китай. Очень надеюсь увидеть там подобных роботов 😮
Затянуло меня в пучину декабрьской суеты, поэтому немного пропал. Спасибо новой GPT Image 1.5, такую новость уже не могу пропускать 😐
Видимо, успех Бананы заставил ребят из Open AI напрячь жопки и наконец-то обновить генератор изображений. Модель перестала искажать исходную картинку, точнее понимает промт и пропала "фирменная" желтизна (скучать не буду 💅)
Еще и генерит значительно быстрее. Можно уже пробовать даже…
Ого, спустя 7 лет журнал Игромания возвращается в печатном издании. Не знаю, раз уж хорошие вещи из прошлого возвращаются, может скоро и цены на недвижимость начнут падать 🤔
Последний раз держал в руках Игроманию году в 2008... Ссылка на новость
🔥7🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @digital_beam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Цифровой Луч | AI & CG” (@digital_beam), 814 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digital_beam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.