Channel
@digidati
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
499subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001980635781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @digidati |
| Description | La tua sicurezza🔒privacy e libertà sono interconnesse e dipendono dalla tua comprensione del mondo digitale: web, devices e ₿. Costruisci tua sovranità digitale consapevolemente, c'è in gioco la tua libertà d'essere te stesso 😎 Scrivimi 💬 @digispiral |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/digidati |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 499 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 499 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
145 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 30.3% | |
| 👍 | 43 | 29.7% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 10.3% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 9.66% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 8.28% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 2.76% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 2.76% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.07% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.69% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.69% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.69% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ho molto timore di dove l'AI ci stia portando in quanto società ed esseri umani. Vivo questa sensazione con curiosità e la consapevolezza che la risposta a quel quesito ce la costruiamo ogni giorno. Senza fine. Oggi ho ascoltato per la prima volta Andrea Colamedici. Il suo modo che ha di approcciare l'AI e la vita è proprio quello che stavo cercando da tempo! 1 ora talmente densa di valore al punto che ci metterò …
🙏12❤1👍1🔥1
Questo mi ha fatto ridere veramente tanto 😂 l'AI italiana (Emma) è davvero creativa e comica accidenti
😁14
Ci siamo ci siamo! https://youtu.be/6d8zrFKpJ8A c'è anche la versione audio podcast, la trovate nella vostra app dei podcast oppure qui: https://castopod.it/@digidati/episodes/80-un-nuovo-capitolo-riflessioni-a-ruota-libera
❤8👍3
😮Nuova puntata il 2 giugno! Parliamo di...?
The shares total 219%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ciao viandante 🖖 segnati il 2 giugno! E c'è un sondaggio qui sotto per te!
🔥3👍2🤩2❤1
NEWS! + ho migrato il mio sito su substack e contemporaneamente ho reso accessibile a tutti la guida di GrapheneOS senza iscrizione via email 🎉 Anche la guida dei 7 giorni della privacy è sbloccata! + ho in programma di fare la video-puntata n.80 per parlare di quanto sta succedendo e in che direzione andremo secondo me + nel frattempo puoi ascoltare la mia chiacchierata con Bitcoin Docet - gente a nodo fatta a di…
❤13👍8🙏3
Live stream finished (1 hour)
Live stream started
Stiamo per iniziare! mettete i vostri commenti e domande qui sotto!
👍1
Live stream scheduled for Oct 26, 2025 at 17:00
Domenica 26 ottobre ore 18 su Youtube e su Telegram ci vediamo nella primissima diretta di Digidati! Potrai farmi tutte le domande che vorrai e approfondiremo le ultime notizie emerse - c'è tantissima carne al fuoco! Ti aspetto :)
👍15❤2🤩2🐳1
PS: Per chi ci sarà al ventennale del Movimento Libertario a Treviglio, ci vediamo domani! Farò anche un breve intervento 😉
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @digidati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
😮Nuova puntata il 2 giugno! Parliamo di...?
The shares total 219%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Tra tutti i contenuti ad oggi da me pubblicati (articoli, podcast, video), quanto hai già consultato?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 712,169 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DigiDati • Informatica consapevole, la 🔑 della tua libertà - privacy digitale” (@digidati), 499 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digidati.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.