Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
101 measurements spanning 51 days, net -6,555. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133,575–151,760 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 101
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 15:15
142,439
-635
25 Sept 2026, 01:58
143,074
+4,730
18 Sept 2026, 22:59
138,344
-6,714
17 Sept 2026, 16:40
145,058
+87
17 Sept 2026, 10:01
144,971
+5,045
16 Sept 2026, 12:15
139,926
-14
15 Sept 2026, 14:21
139,940
-15
15 Sept 2026, 10:18
139,955
-47
14 Sept 2026, 19:16
140,002
-770
13 Sept 2026, 22:17
140,772
-124
13 Sept 2026, 17:15
140,896
-613
13 Sept 2026, 05:19
141,509
-158
12 Sept 2026, 08:16
141,667
-4,393
11 Sept 2026, 19:15
146,060
-54
11 Sept 2026, 06:36
146,114
-105
10 Sept 2026, 04:57
146,219
-95
9 Sept 2026, 08:56
146,314
-3,132
8 Sept 2026, 12:41
149,446
-216
6 Sept 2026, 21:16
149,662
+4,251
6 Sept 2026, 00:16
145,411
first reading
Engagement
204 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.92%
avg views ÷ 142,439 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,150
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.689%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
101
of 204 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
204 (1 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
415,390
Reactions total
2,863
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈109
Links
≈1,250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,893 reactions across 198 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,259
21.4%
🤯
1,172
19.9%
🔥
1,105
18.8%
👍
999
17.0%
😁
383
6.50%
😭
136
2.31%
⚡
130
2.21%
🏆
98
1.66%
💯
71
1.20%
😢
61
1.04%
😱
61
1.04%
🎉
54
0.916%
👀
40
0.679%
❤🔥
36
0.611%
👾
30
0.509%
💔
27
0.458%
😈
27
0.458%
🤩
22
0.373%
👌
19
0.322%
😨
19
0.322%
22 further kinds
144
2.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 202 of the 204 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,034 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 204 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
99
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 202 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 204 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤯 ИИ OPENAI ВЫНЕС В ИНТЕРНЕТ 53 ФОТО ПОЛЬЗОВАТЕЛЕЙ
OpenAI обнаружила 53 случая, когда её исследовательские ИИ-агенты разместили загруженные пользователями изображения на сторонних сервисах.
Фотографии публиковались в виде непубличных ссылок, однако их всё равно можно было обнаружить через интернет.
OpenAI заявила, что это было неправильным использованием пользовательских данных. Компания уже работает с сервисами х…
👋 TELEGRAM ГОТОВИТ НАСТРОЙКИ КАЧЕСТВА ВИДЕОКРУЖКОВ
В стабильной версии Telegram для Android 12.10.5 появилась новая экспериментальная настройка в меню отладки.
📷 Раздел «Round Video» позволяет вручную настраивать параметры записи видеосообщений, включая их качество.
Пока функция спрятана в экспериментальных настройках и предназначена для тестирования.
🔗 Быстрый VPN без ограничений
🤯 ANTHROPIC ЗАКАЗАЛА ОБЛАЧНЫЕ МОЩНОСТИ НА $11,6 МЛРД
Anthropic заключила с Akamai семилетнее соглашение на $11,6 млрд для масштабирования своих ИИ-систем.
⚡️ Основной фокус — CPU-вычисления: Anthropic будет использовать распределённую облачную инфраструктуру Akamai для растущих нагрузок. Сделку могут расширить ещё на $9 млрд, доведя потенциальный объём до $20 млрд.
🔗 Быстрый VPN без ограничений
🐶 ПЕРЕВОД GRAM ПО ЮЗЕРНЕЙМУ
В новой бета-версии Telegram для macOS 12.10.283234 обнаружили новые детали работы встроенного 💎 Gram Wallet.
В будущем адрес кошелька можно будет привязать к Telegram-аккаунту и отправлять средства прямо по @юзернейму — без необходимости копировать и вводить длинный адрес. Также при отправке Gram пользователю уже можно увидеть и скопировать адрес его кошелька.
🔗 Быстрый VPN без огранич…
🚀 GOOGLE ОТПРАВИТ ИИ В КОСМОС
Google начала подготовку к первому орбитальному тесту Project Suncatcher — проекта по созданию инфраструктуры для ИИ прямо в космосе.
🛰 Уже на следующей неделе прототип спутника с фирменными TPU-чипами Google отправят на орбиту вместе с SpaceX. Главная задача — проверить, смогут ли чипы нормально работать в условиях космоса: радиации, сильной вибрации, экстремальных температур и отсутс…
⭐️ ЗВЁЗДЫ ТЕЛЕГРАМ ПРИНЕСЛИ УЖЕ $150 МЛН
За всё время пользователи потратили уже 10 019 292 591⭐️ — это примерно $150 млн.
🪙 В сумму входят покупки уникальных подарков на первичном рынке и всех неулучшаемых подарков. А Telegram продолжает зарабатывать и на самом рынке: около $70 000 в день только на передаче подарков.
🔗 Быстрый VPN без ограничений
🧬 CLAUDE НАШЁЛ НОВУЮ СИСТЕМУ В ДНК
Anthropic сообщила, что её ИИ Claude обнаружил ранее нехарактеризованную ферментную систему, связанную с ДНК-повторами, напоминающими структуру CRISPR*.
Для поиска Claude использовал около 950 ИИ-агентов, которые за 21 час просмотрели огромные массивы ДНК. Они нашли более 200 000 обратных транскриптаз, отобрали 3500 перспективных систем, а затем сузили список до 20 наиболее интере…
🎙 GEMINI НАУЧИЛСЯ КЛОНИРОВАТЬ ГОЛОС
Google представила Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS и Flash-Lite TTS — новые модели для генерации речи.
Теперь ИИ может создавать полностью новые голоса с нуля по текстовому описанию или воспроизводить существующий голос по 30-секундной аудиозаписи. Можно отдельно управлять эмоциями, темпом, акцентом, интонацией и даже манерой произношения для каждой реплики. Модели поддерживают более 100 яз…
ПОСТАВИЛ 130⭐️ — ПОЛУЧИЛ 8 ЛЕТ
57-летнего жителя Тюмени приговорили к 8 годам строгого режима.
По версии следствия, мужчина оставил около 130⭐️ платных реакций под публикациями Telegram-каналов, признанных в России связанными с иноагентами, экстремистскими или террористическими организациями.
Следствие квалифицировало эти реакции как финансирование экстремистской и террористической деятельности.
🔗 Быстрый VPN без…
😁40😭15❤1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 204 posts we hold for @digest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gifts Holder” (@digest), 142,439 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.