Channel
@dietolog_kononenko_spb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,114subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001764780124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dietolog_kononenko_spb |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dietolog_kononenko_spb |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 2,114 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 2,110 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 2,119 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 2,114 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 2,117 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 2,114 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 2,113 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 2,112 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 2,112 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
136 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 52.2% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 24.3% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 16.2% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.94% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.21% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 1.47% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.735% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что реально защищает ваши сосуды — и с чего начать прямо сейчас Без теорий. Только практика — то, что работает в реальных консультациях. ❌ Убрать или сократить: — Простые углеводы (выпечка, сладкое, белый хлеб, соки, сухофрукты в большом количестве) — Трансжиры — читайте состав: «гидрогенизированное масло» в любом печенье, вафлях, маргарине — Подсолнечное масло для жарки и в прозрачных бутылках на свету — Кофе из …
❤4🔥3
Желчный пузырь и холестерин. Связь, которую не ищут — и поэтому не находят Один из путей, по которым холестерин «расходуется» в организме — это синтез желчных кислот. Желчь образуется из холестерина в печени и выводится через желчный пузырь. Если желчь плохо отходит — холестерин не расходуется. Остаётся в крови. Цифры растут. Что мешает желчеоттоку: → Сладж (хлопья, осадок в желчном пузыре) → Густая желчь → «Лени…
👍6
Щитовидная железа и атеросклероз. Связь, о которой почти не говорят Когда мы думаем о щитовидной железе — обычно вспоминаем про вес, усталость, выпадение волос. ❗️Но есть кое-что важнее. Некомпенсированный гипотиреоз — сниженная функция щитовидной железы — ускоряет развитие атеросклероза. Это доказано. Почему? Гормоны щитовидки регулируют скорость всех обменных процессов, включая жировой обмен. При их дефиците: …
👍7🤗2❤1
Холестерин и генетика. Почему у одних он высокий при любом питании — а у других нормальный, даже если едят всё подряд Это один из самых важных и недооценённых вопросов в теме холестерина. У каждого из нас есть около 15 генов, которые кодируют холестериновый обмен. Скорость работы этих генов определяет, насколько эффективно организм синтезирует и утилизирует холестерин. Если ген работает на 100% — хватит ферментов,…
❤9
Три приёма пищи. Без перекусов. Почему это важнее, чем выбор между гречкой и рисом Один из самых частых советов в диетологии последних лет — «дробное питание, 5–6 раз в день маленькими порциями». Потом маятник качнулся в другую сторону — «интервальное голодание, один раз в день». Позиция Инны Александровны Кононенко, к.м.н., врача-нейронутрициолога: ни то ни другое не соответствует физиологии. Три приёма пищи — за…
❤10
Результаты теста — это не диагноз, но хороший повод задуматься. Если вы ответили правильно на 4–5 вопросов — вы уже понимаете главное: холестерин нельзя рассматривать отдельно от обмена веществ. Если правильных ответов меньше — это нормально. Но это как раз та зона, где многие совершают ошибку: начинают убирать жиры, покупать БАДы, пить омегу, садиться на диеты — вместо того чтобы разобраться, почему показатели изм…
❤7🔥2
Когда стоит обратиться к эндокринологу?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥2❤1
Что хуже всего делать при повышенном холестерине?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👌3
Что может быть связано с повышенным холестерином?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1🔥1
Если общий холестерин повышен, что правильнее сделать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥3❤1🥰1
Какой показатель чаще всего называют “плохим” холестерином?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4🔥1
Мини-тест: что вы знаете о холестерине? Повышенный холестерин может долго никак не ощущаться. Нет боли, нет явных симптомов — а изменения в сосудах и обмене веществ уже могут идти. И важный момент: холестерин — это не всегда только про жирную еду. Он может быть связан с весом, сахаром, инсулинорезистентностью, щитовидной железой, гормональным фоном и общим состоянием обмена веществ. Давайте проверим, насколько вы …
👍4🔥1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dietolog_kononenko_spb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Когда стоит обратиться к эндокринологу?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что хуже всего делать при повышенном холестерине?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что может быть связано с повышенным холестерином?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Если общий холестерин повышен, что правильнее сделать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой показатель чаще всего называют “плохим” холестерином?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Центр превентивной и интегративной медицины Инны Кононенко” (@dietolog_kononenko_spb), 2,114 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dietolog_kononenko_spb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.