Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

dieBasis BW Infokanal

@dieBasisBW

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

494subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194506838
TypeChannel
Username@dieBasisBW
Descriptionwww.dieBasis-bw.de
Created30 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dieBasisBW

Growth

4946 Aug 2026, 10:05 — 494 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:47 — 494 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 10:056 Aug 2026, 18:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 493–495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:47494no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:05494first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.0%
avg views ÷ 494 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,782
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
142
Videos
114
Links
331

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍240.0%
👏240.0%
120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC44 viewsread 6 August 2026

Willst Du erwachsen werden? Willst Du gesund werden? Willst Du Du Willst Du erwachsen werden? Willst Du gesund werden? Willst Du Du selbst werden? Willst Du endlich SEIN? Willst Du Dich leben? Willst Du endlich dein „Ich bin“ spüren? Deinen Wert fühlen und für das leben deines Wertes sorgen? Für Dich sorgen? Willst Du tief schlafen und voller Sinn und Kraft aufwachen? Willst Du bewusste wache verantwortliche Menschen

6 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC40 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @MartinSchwab

SACHSEN-ANHALTS BILDUNGSMINISTER WILL ES NICHT KAPIEREN Teil 1 Liebe Community, Was die WELT hier https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article6a72a1e1cc46967c04caefb8/sachsen-anhalt-selbst-kinder-verbreiten-rechtsradikale-sprueche-bildungsminister-warnt-vor-informationsblasen.html über aktuelle Aussagen von Sachsen-Anhalts Ministerpräsident Jan Riedel berichtet (es handelt sich um eine dpa-Meldung, die auch in d

6 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @MartinSchwab

SACHSEN-ANHALTS BILDUNGSMINISTER WILL ES NICHT KAPIEREN Teil 2 (Fortsetzung von 👆 Teil 1) Die fortschreitende Zerklüftung des Debattenraums kann man getrost als bedrohliche Fehlentwicklung bezeichnen. Sie ist aber die direkte Folge der Ausgrenzung „unliebsamer” Meinungen aus dem Diskurs. Das Problem, dass die Menschen nur noch Medien konsumieren, in denen sie das lesen, was sie lesen wollen, besteht übrigens nicht n

👍2👏1

6 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC48 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://x.com/Mwgfd_official/status/2085122552255410300?s=20

4 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC83 viewsread 6 August 2026

Wo auch die Ukraine bzw ihre Frauen ausgenutzt wird : https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=154500

4 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC94 viewsread 6 August 2026

Frieden ist möglich mit nur 3 Maßnahmen https://youtube.com/shorts/PfTA5L4-4fE?is=iijLnD_K0botlpCl

3 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC72 viewsread 6 August 2026

Eine ganz andere Sicht der Dinge, und die Antworten auf die Frage, wem nutzt das ? https://youtu.be/r3w2PW2MduI?is=jdWaBQaSIAiwsVk1

1 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC125 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ex-Verfassungsrichter sieht etablierte Parteien als Gefahr für die Demokratie Der ehemalige Vorsitzende des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Hans-Jürgen Papier, ist in einem Interview mit dem „Tagesspiegel“ scharf mit der etablierten Politik ins Gericht gegangen: Immer mehr Menschen hätten nicht mehr das Vertrauen, dass sich die Probleme des Landes unter den Bedingungen des demokratischen Systems lösen lassen. Verantwortl

1 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC104 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ist das Bargeld gerettet? Die aktuelle Entwicklung lässt zunächst hoffen: Es spricht vieles dafür, dass Bargeld künftig im Handel grundsätzlich angenommen werden muss. Ein Erfolg der Initiative https://bargelderhalt.eu Doch genau hier beginnt das eigentliche Problem. Im Verordnungsentwurf finden sich zwei weitreichende Ausnahmen, die den Bargeldkreislauf erheblich schwächen könnten. Unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen

👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dieBasisBW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“dieBasis BW Infokanal” (@dieBasisBW), 494 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dieBasisBW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.