4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 264–267 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 19:24
264
-3
20 Aug 2026, 18:36
267
+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:42
266
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:01
266
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 264 subscribers
Avg views / post
31.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
17 (18 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
95
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#اخلاق_تشکیلاتی
🔷 آب در کوزه و ما تشنه لبان میگردیم
وارد هر مجموعه دانشجویی که بشوی، یک فهرست بلندبالا از اسامی وجود دارد: اعضای فعال، اعضای عادی، نیروهای دورههای قبل، بچههای اردوی فلان. اسمها که ردیف میشوند، آدم احساس قدرت میکند. ولی کافی است یک مأموریت ساده تعریف کنی. آن وقت همان فهرست شلوغ، ناگهان خلوت میشود. انگار خیلی از این اسمها فقط روی کاغذ هستند.
این حرف، گلایه از آدمها نیست. این حرف، رو کردن دست…
📚 تشکیلات بهشتی
▪️ قسمت چهارم ||انباشت نیروها و ضعف تشکیلات
📌جامعه ما جامعهای پرنیرو؛ اما وقتی دست به هر کاری میزنیم در همان قدمهای اول و دوم میبینیم نیرو کم داریم، آب در خانه هست و ما تشنهلب برمیگردیم. وقتی هم شناسایی میکنیم، باز قدرت سازمان و ساماندادن و تجربه تشکیلاتیمان کم است. گاهی میبینیم نیروها انباشته شدهاند و کار زیادی انجام نمیگیرد. بنابراین، به روشنی به این نتیجه میرسیم که ما دچار ضعف تشکیلا…
#اخلاق_تشکیلاتی
🔷 صدای عمل بلند تر است.
همه ما در کار تشکیلاتی دغدغه جذب داریم. دنبال روشهای خلاقانه برای دعوت دیگران به مسیر هستیم. اردوهای معرفتی، جلسات نقد و گفتگو... اینها خوب است، اما یک خلأ هست که هیچکدام از این ابزارها به تنهایی پر نمیکنند: اگر «عمل» ما جاذبه نداشته باشد، تمام این هزینهها بیهوده میرود.
⚠️ نکته هشدار دهندهاش اینجاست که هر کدام از ما، در همان حوزه کاری خودمان، هم میتوانیم جاذبهآفرین باش…
📚 تشکیلات بهشتی
▪️ قسمت سوم || جاذبهآفرینی با عمل
📌 از نگاه شهید دکتر بهشتی، جاذبهآفرینی با عمل، بالاترین و مؤثرترین دعوت به عمل است ... هر یک از ما، در حوزه کار خاص خودش، هم میتواند جاذبهآفرین باشد و هم میتواند خدای ناکرده، نزدیکان را از هرچه مسلمانی است دلزده و بیزار کند ... همین حرفهایی را هم که اینجا عرض میکنم، اگر صرفاً برای گفتن و شنیدن باشد، واقعاً نمیارزد.
᯽⊱──╌❊ - ❊╌──⊰᯽⊱
☫ | واحد رشد و کادرسازی …
⭕️اطلاعیه
با پیگیری های مکرر مجموعه بسیج دانشجویی دانشگاه یاسوج و همکاری مسئولین دانشگاه ، اعتبار مصوب شده کاروان دانشجویی اربعین پرداخت و انشالله امروز ۳ اتوبوس از دانشجویان دانشگاه یاسوج به کربلا معلی اعزام خواهند شد.
᯽⊱──╌❊ - ❊╌──⊰᯽⊱
☫ | حوزه بسیج دانشجویی شهید میثمی
دانشگاه سراسری یاسوج
📱 | فضای مجازی: بله | روبیکا | ایتا | تلگرام
📌#دانشجویان زائر سفر #اربعین از شهرهای مختلف کشور جهت اعزام در مسجد الغدیر #دانشگاه یاسوج در حال پذیرش هستند.
اما هنوز پرداخت #اعتبار مصوب شده سفر از سمت دانشگاه انجام نشده است.
᯽⊱──╌❊ - ❊╌──⊰᯽⊱
☫ | حوزه بسیج دانشجویی شهید میثمی
دانشگاه سراسری یاسوج
📱 | فضای مجازی: بله | روبیکا | ایتا | تلگرام
در شرایط جنگی کشور دانشجو با هزار امید و آرزو ، جهت شرکت در پیاده روی بزرگ اربعین لحظه شماری میکند.
کمتر از ۱۲ ساعت تا اعزام باقی مانده و تنها ۱۰۰ دانشجو چشم انتظار تحقق وعده دانشگاه هستند.
با وجود تصویب بودجه در ۲۸ تیرماه هنوز اعتبارات لازم برای اعزام پرداخت نشده است.
᯽⊱──╌❊ - ❊╌──⊰᯽⊱
☫ | حوزه بسیج دانشجویی شهید میثمی
دانشگاه سراسری یاسوج
📱 | فضای مجازی: بله | روبیکا | ایتا | تلگرام
#اخلاق_تشکیلاتی
🔷 رهبری که راه را رفته باشد...
در کار تشکیلاتی، تحلیل و بیان خوب ارزشمند است، اما خلأ اصلی وقتی دیده میشود که مدیر، مسیر را زندگی نکرده باشد. او در بهترین حالت «تحلیلگر دور ایستاده» میماند، نه «رهبر میدان». برنامه هایش ایدهآل است، توقعش غیر واقعی، و تصمیم هایش شبیه نسخهای برای بیماری که ندیده.
نتیجه: کار ناقص، خستگی نیروها، و شکاف بی اعتمادی.
💡 تجربهٔ زیسته، چراغ تصمیم گیری است
مدیری که رده…
📚 تشکیلات بهشتی
▪️ قسمت دوم || رهبر و مدیر در جامعه پیشرفته
📌 رهبر و مدیر در جامعه پیشرفته
عبارت است از کسی که قبل از آن فردی که میخواهد او را رهبری کند، آن را راه خودش طی کرده؛ از شیب و فراز آن راه آگاه باشد. رهبری که راه نورد نباشد و راه را نپیموده باشد، رهبر نیست. رهبر باید شیب و فرازها را طی کرده باشد. آگاهیهایش از اسرار کار، آگاهیهای کتابی، روزنامهای، شنیدنی و مسموعی و کلاسی نباشد. آگاهیهایش باید عینی باش…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @didehbidar_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 324,399 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دیده بیدار | دانشگاه یاسوج” (@didehbidar_ir), 264 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/didehbidar_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.