Мне кажется, что у нас с вами летом ничего не получится.
👀2🕊2👻1

Channel
@diaryoking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002822101276 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diaryoking |
| Description | 𐍃𐌕𐌀𐌓𐌕: 17.06.25 (27.07.24) |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 2 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diaryoking |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 15 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 15 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
312 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5436115659593378990 | 44 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5445082941422072140 | 33 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5435913091755835330 | 32 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5438180778653546797 | 26 | 8.33% | |
| 🕊 | 25 | 8.01% | |
| custom 5436365944517589063 | 21 | 6.73% | |
| 👻 | 21 | 6.73% | |
| custom 5436108658796689488 | 17 | 5.45% | |
| custom 5303320429056784141 | 16 | 5.13% | |
| custom 5436094081677690033 | 15 | 4.81% | |
| custom 5436180131347463642 | 14 | 4.49% | |
| custom 5445322742331112133 | 12 | 3.85% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 3.21% | |
| custom 5436345358739338668 | 9 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5438604721990432271 | 9 | 2.88% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 1.60% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.962% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мне кажется, что у нас с вами летом ничего не получится.
👀2🕊2👻1
Channel name was changed to «close . Ɗ𐌉𐌀𐌓𐍔 𐌊𐌉NG 𐌏𐌅 W𐌀𐌊𐌀NƊ𐌀𓈒 𝇌ׄ ⸼»
➡️T'𑀝ɦᥲᥣᥣᥲ 𐌵ɗᥲκᥙ✅ 🌟🌟 ☺️🥬 🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🔦 Важный день настал. Подписание «Заковианского» договора. Я окинул взглядом зал и заметил знакомую рыжую макушку. Я подошел сзади: —Смотрю не только я привык быть в центре внимания? Она сразу же обернулась. –…Пожалуй. Это довольно обременительно. —Тем не менее держитесь вы отлично. Учитывая ваш визит в Капитолий, вам должно быть не слишком комфортно в такой…
custom 54361801313474636428custom 54361156595933789905🕊4custom 54363659445175890633custom 54450829414220721403
➡️T'𑀝ɦᥲᥣᥣᥲ 𐌵ɗᥲκᥙ✅ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🙀🎤Липсинги снимаю.. 𝘈𝘕𝘖𝘕 🎭• 𝘉𝘖𝘖𝘚𝘛 📈 🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 #Pᵒˢᵗ #Vᶦᵈᵉᵒ #Eᵈᶦᵗᵉˢ
custom 53033204290567841416custom 54361086587966894886custom 54450829414220721405custom 54361156595933789903custom 54361801313474636423custom 54359130917558353302custom 54363453587393386682custom 54386047219904322712
➡️T'𑀝ɦᥲᥣᥣᥲ 𐌵ɗᥲκᥙ✅ 🐾 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🙀🎤Я бы хотел достать Вам звезды с неба, но пока могу рассыпать их только так. Это далеко не всё. А вы? Принял: 𝘙𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘯, 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢. Передаю: 𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘵 𝘙𝘰𝘴𝘴, 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘟𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘳. 𝘈𝘕𝘖𝘕 🎭•𝘉𝘖𝘖𝘚𝘛 📈 🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 #Pᵒˢᵗ #Vᶦᵈᵉᵒ #Eᵈᶦᵗᵉˢ
custom 54359130917558353305custom 54361086587966894885custom 54361801313474636423custom 54450829414220721403custom 53033204290567841412custom 54361156595933789902custom 54363453587393386682custom 54386047219904322712
➡️T'𑀝ɦᥲᥣᥣᥲ 𐌵ɗᥲκᥙ✅ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ «🙀🎤Плюс материал к шантажу.. Личная выгода.» 𝘈𝘕𝘖𝘕 🎭• 𝘉𝘖𝘖𝘚𝘛 📈 🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 #Pᵒˢᵗ #Cʰᵃᵗ #Dᵃᶦᶫʸ
custom 54361156595933789906custom 54450829414220721405custom 53033204290567841413custom 54359130917558353303custom 54363453587393386683custom 54386047219904322712
➡️T'𑀝ɦᥲᥣᥣᥲ 𐌵ɗᥲκᥙ✅ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤ention🔽 𓈒 𝇌ׄ ⸼ 𝘒𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘉𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘱. «🙀🎤Через пару часов полетим домой - семейный ужин.» 𝘈𝘕𝘖𝘕 🎭• 𝘉𝘖𝘖𝘚𝘛 📈 🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 #Pᵒˢᵗ #Cʰᵃᵗ #Dᵃᶦᶫʸ
custom 54450829414220721405custom 54361156595933789904custom 54386047219904322713custom 53033204290567841412custom 54359130917558353302custom 54361086587966894882custom 54363453587393386682
➡️T'𑀝ɦᥲᥣᥣᥲ 𐌵ɗᥲκᥙ🤒 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ «🙀🎤Я умею.» 🔡resence 𝘞𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘳. 🔤🔤🔤 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘢 𝘙𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘧𝘧. 🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 𝘈𝘕𝘖𝘕 🎭• 𝘉𝘖𝘖𝘚𝘛 📈 🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 #Pᵒˢᵗ #Eᵈᶦᵗᵉˢ #Vᶦᵈᵉᵒ 👤НИ В КОЕМ СЛУЧАЕ НЕ ШИП!!
custom 54359130917558353306custom 54361086587966894884custom 54361156595933789904custom 53033204290567841413custom 54450829414220721403
Video message, posted without a caption
👻10👀6🕊5
Sticker, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54359130917558353306custom 54450829414220721404custom 54453227423311121333
➡️T'𑀝ɦᥲᥣᥣᥲ 𐌵ɗᥲκᥙ🤒 🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤 🔤 ☁️☁️☁️☁️🔤 🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩„🤩ила-была звёздочка, 🤩вроде бы самая обычная, 🤩каких тысячи… 🤩...звёздочка села на прикроватный столик, включила фонарик и сказала на своём звёздном: —Теперь моя очередь рассказывать сказку.“ тяжёлые времена …
custom 54453227423311121337custom 54359130917558353306custom 54361156595933789906custom 54450829414220721405
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @diaryoking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 899,908 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@diaryoking named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“close . Ɗ𐌉𐌀𐌓𐍔 𐌊𐌉NG 𐌏𐌅 W𐌀𐌊𐌀NƊ𐌀𓈒 𝇌ׄ ⸼” (@diaryoking), 15 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diaryoking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.