Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Культурное кино

Channel

Культурное кино

@diaryofcritic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

870subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001245740104
TypeChannel
Username@diaryofcritic
DescriptionВо вкусе черника, красное яблоко, молочный шоколад и яркая ягодная кислотность. Фидбэк и все вопросы: @GeorgeKK Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/mccgyell/
Created14 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/diaryofcritic

Growth

8706 Aug 2026, 05:42 — 870 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:34 — 870 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 05:426 Aug 2026, 14:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 869–871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 14:34870no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:42870first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
499
Videos
30
Links
838

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

110 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5550.0%
😁3834.5%
👍1513.6%
👎21.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
441
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 19 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @diaryofcritic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 January 2026 to 3 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC182 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как раз думал, футбол сегодня посмотреть или Соррентино… Upd. Выбрал, естественно, «Мажора»

4

11 Jun 2026, 18:30 UTC301 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Каждый из нас хочет оставить след в истории. Но не всем это удается. А мне уже удалось. После себя я оставлю: • Рецензию на «Холоп 2» • Информационный текст про «Холоп 2» • Рецензию на «Холоп: Великолепный век» И наконец… Рецензию на «Холоп 3» https://t-j.ru/holop-3-2026-review/

😁43👍3

9 Jun 2026, 20:15 UTC274 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Холоп 3» — определенно один из киноопытов всех времен

😁6

1 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC348 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если вы не слушаете современный русский народный хип-хоп рэп — многое теряете Пару месяцев назад один современный хитмейкер в треке рифмовал «внимание — Германия». А другой (с именем Лил Кавказ, кстати) — «Жора — обжора». Но вы и дальше говорите, что сильных текстовиков в новой школе нет Теперь все тот же Лил Кавказ и Гуф записали трек о том, какие они близкие — старший брат за младшего брата, так за основу взято.

😁4

21 May 2026, 10:54 UTC299 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Гай Ричи выпустил юбилейный тысячный проект за год Долго режиссера умеренно защищал за былые заслуги и минимальные остатки авторского стиля. «Министерство неджентльменских дел» мне в целом понравилось, «Переводчика» и «Гнев человеческий» считаю базой мужчинского кино для мужчин Но «Грязные деньги» — та самая соломинка, сломавшая спину верблюда. Кажется, если Гаю Ричи отрубят голову, он еще пару лет будет снимать по

😁2

18 Apr 2026, 09:24 UTC365 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Про новый последний сезон «Пацанов» Всего за три серии он научил нас не делать поспешных выводов Начало первого эпизода — это прям квинтэссенция всего, чем меня раздражал четвертый сезон. Абсолютно прямолинейные аллюзии на нацизм, политическая «сатира» толще Пэдди Пимблетта между боями и облако популярных тегов: фейкньюс, дипфейк, нейросеть. Разве что Тун Тун Тун Сахура забыли Финал первого эпизода — ровно то, за

3

17 Apr 2026, 10:00 UTC263 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Иногда они возвращаются

4

12 Apr 2026, 11:08 UTC327 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

YouTube сообщил, что где-то между релизом «Военной машины» и завершением съемок нового сезона «Ричера» Ричсон успел подраться с пьяным соседом Прекрасная история. Представьте: вы выпили, вышли на улицу, решили толкнуть какого-то мужика на зеленом мотоцикле. А в итоге нарвались на 190-сантиметрового Джека Ричера Я бы после такого долго думал, в какой момент фортуна меня оставила

👍31

11 Apr 2026, 17:17 UTC257 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вчера посмотрел боевик «Военная машина» (War Machine) с Аланом Ричсоном — и это безусловно синема высочайшей категории Netflix через семь лет после релиза «Тройной границы» смог сделать военное кино в десять раз глупее и ровно настолько же круче. После просмотра вспомнил, что хочу стать Джеком Ричером, когда вырасту. Поэтому следом сел пересматривать амазоновский сериал Но кое что авторы, увы, не дожали. Кино насто

5

9 Apr 2026, 16:05 UTC239 views2 reactions88 Starsread 6 August 2026

Чтобы заслужить текст про новый фильм Боргли киножурналист Амиян писал рецензии на всякий мусор https://t-j.ru/the-drama-2026-review/ «Вот это драма!» я посмотрел еще в начале прошлой недели и рад, что текст не пришлось сдавать сразу Потому что сперва в голове фильм отложился как THE драма от студии А24: будто выращенный в пробирке специально для людей с подвернутыми шапками на голове и лавандовым рафом в руках. П

2

3 Apr 2026, 09:06 UTC260 views3 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Простите, коллеги, но моя «Римская империя» недели — это Гарри Поттер, который отправляется в Dripwarts: The school of drip Если в сериале HBO не будут подробно показаны факультеты Drippindor, Slaytherin, Hustlepuff и Rizzinclaw… я не буду его смотреть

😁3

23 Mar 2026, 08:54 UTC382 views2 reactions100 Starsread 6 August 2026

Почти два года назад в телеграме активно обсуждали колонку Картозии о Сарике. Она примерно на 80% состояла из «хы, он хач. раскадровки на лаваше, диплом выиграл в нарды». Но где-то между ржомб автор указал и причину успеха Андреасянов режиссеров-продюсеров: скорость работы — качество при этом вторично Премьера «Домовенка Кузи 2» вновь заставила об этом подумать. Обычно подобные мероприятия проходят так: сбор гостей

😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @diaryofcritic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,029,815 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Культурное кино” (@diaryofcritic), 870 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diaryofcritic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.