Channel
@dianamiroshnikova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
403subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002111736177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dianamiroshnikova |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dianamiroshnikova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 403 | no change |
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 403 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (26 May 2026 – 16 September 2026) |
| Views total | 413 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 90.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И да, кофе по утрам долгое время был для меня обязательным ритуалом ☕️ С кофе я экспериментировала по-разному, но последние девять месяцев 3–5 чашек в день были стабильной частью моей жизни. И даже несмотря на то, что Артур уже около пяти месяцев нормально спит, кофе всё равно продолжал выпиваться в довольно больших количествах🦦 В какой-то момент я заметила, что фоновая тревожность и отёчность сохраняются даже при …
❤6
Coffee time ☕️ 16 дней с гораздо меньшим количеством кофеина. Полёт нормальный 😁 Пока я жила в Харькове, я домой даже не покупала кофе, даже не могу сказать, что особо его любила, то ли дело с подругой в 1654 или в kofeine выпить латте с орешками - для прекрасной атмосферы 😋 Вот с переездом в Турцию и покупкой кофемашини - я стала пить его больше. Что уж говорить за Канаду, я прям чувствовала, что это то, что мн…
❤2
Мы начали нашу новую главу жизни в Бельгии 🫶🏻 Я в абсолютном восторге от этой страны, мы даже не ожидали, что нам понравится тут настолько, так как мы очень мало чего знали про эту страну . И если совсем откровенно говоря, то готовились в Европе мы к другой стране, но посмотрев Бельгию - передумали 🔎Теперь мы тут ♥️ Буду делиться постепенно с вами - жизнью тут 🫶🏻
❤14👍2
Thank you for everything, Toronto ♥️ Это был одновременно самый прекрасный и самый сложный период в моей жизни. Мы провели вместе 3,5 года. И сегодня я благодарна за то, что всё сложилось именно так ✨ Что-то в жизни даётся легко, а что-то приходит через огромные усилия, потери и испытания. Мы много раз ошибались, но также и многому научились ♥️ Но, несмотря ни на что, мы всегда приобретаем главное - опыт. В Торон…
❤4
26 feels like growth, peace & beauty 🤎🥳 26.05.26 ♥️ Вхожу в свои 26 с такими выводами ✨ Ценить спокойствие. Беречь свою энергию. Создавать красоту вокруг себя. Быть там, где тебя ценят — и ценить в ответ 🤍 Встречаю свои 26 с любимыми рядом и красивыми целями и мечтами ♥️🥰 Photo @lerrcher Makeup @makeup_suzy Studio @mintroomstudios 🌹
❤2🔥1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @dianamiroshnikova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Diana’s Diary 🎀” (@dianamiroshnikova), 403 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dianamiroshnikova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.