Channel
@diana_indi_s
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
243subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001778157210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diana_indi_s |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diana_indi_s |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 243 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 241 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 241 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
161 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 50 | 31.1% | |
| 😍 | 25 | 15.5% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 13.7% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 12.4% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 6.21% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 5.59% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.73% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 3.73% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.48% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.86% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 1.86% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.24% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.621% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
10 причин приехать на Мультибрендинг. Мы могли бы написать: 40+ спикеров, несколько дней программы, вечеринки, нетворкинг… Но это вы и так знаете. Поэтому вот настоящие причины. До Мультибрендинга — 43 дня. Возможно, это лучшие четыре дня, которые вы инвестируете в себя, в свою команду и свой бизнес в этом году. Путевки на сайте multibranding.ru повышение цены с 10 июля
❤5🔥4🥰4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥8😍5❤4
Хей, хеллоу! 👋 Мы тут заколлабились с командой покорителей искусственного интеллекта SPELLLENS ❤️ Ребята запустили игру со знакомой многим механикой 3 в ряд и приправили классными подарками от партнеров 🔥 В том числе и от меня 💃 Что за бонусы? • Промокод на 5000р и 5 путевок от Мультибрендинг • Промокод -20% на DProfile • Промокод -15% на Плюс к Уровню • Бокал пива на кране в Синем коте • Футболка с автографом от Н…
❤🔥9😍9👏6
Ждали арт-завтрак?) А вот и повод выгулять летние наряды и провести выходной в классной компании 💃 Мы с Дианой приглашаем вас на лекцию-дискуссию 31 мая (вс) в 11:00! Будем рассказывать про 🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠, пить чай с вкусняшками, много смеяться, конечно! 💥Фан-факт про Руссо: В 1907 году он был вовлечён в банковское мошенничество и предстал перед судом. В качестве доказательства его невиновности адвокат использовал карт…
❤🔥6😍5👏2🔥2
Сейчас пролистала все каналы, которые у меня уже 2 недели висели с непрочитанными постами и словила себя на мысли, что все такие молодцы: пишут тексты, выступают, куда-то ходят, ездят, участвуют. А я томат 🍅 Решила оповестить тех, кто тоже в томатной тусовке: НОРМАЛЬНО НИЧЕГО НЕ ДЕЛАТЬ иногда ) если нет желания и энергии, если нет пока возможности и другие приоритеты. Обняла всех, кто от социальных сетей ловит ощущ…
💯20👏7👍6🤝2😭2
Очень коротко о Моди
❤🔥7🤝4😁3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥5👏2😍2
Приглашаю вас на лекцию-дискуссию про одну из самых известных женщин-художниц Фриду Кало 🌹 ❤️🔥 Поговорим о том, почему мы так хорошо знакомы с ее образом, но почти ничего не знаем о картинах ❤️🔥 Вы узнаете какой силой духа обладала Фрида, не смотря на искалеченное тело и предательства ❤️🔥 Мы поговорим о том, как она стала героиней обложки VOGUE и как ее образ до сих пор вдохновляет кутюрье Соберемся камерным фор…
❤🔥5🔥4😍4👏1💔1
Протестировала на этой неделе микс «старого» и «нового» способа в упорядочивании мыслей и поиске ответов на вопросы ) Попросила ChatGPT развернуть мой вопрос и пообсуждать варианты решения через нейро-логическую пирамиду Роберта Дилтса. Получилось очень точно, емко и мозг не так сильно сопротивлялся, как если бы я это делала сама с собой. Все-таки условная эмпатия и поддержка от ИИ подбадривает ) Большой плюс, что…
❤🔥10👏4🦄3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @diana_indi_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,090,214 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Если что, спрашивай 💚” (@diana_indi_s), 243 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diana_indi_s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.