जीवन का दूसरा रूप
custom 525167053103958783415custom 53507245070887463398custom 52513175190875932067custom 54021560274937711144

Channel
@diamondlerika
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001692486075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diamondlerika |
| Description | vk: https://vk.com/l3rika inst: lerikadiamond |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diamondlerika |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 131 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 131 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
267 reactions across 8 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253895268264339496 | 43 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5406690439216520693 | 29 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5348188397619937424 | 28 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5409080300753936662 | 20 | 7.49% | |
| custom 5217724754504472464 | 19 | 7.12% | |
| custom 5350724507088746339 | 19 | 7.12% | |
| custom 5404568656652820855 | 18 | 6.74% | |
| custom 5251670531039587834 | 15 | 5.62% | |
| custom 5350677610340847046 | 13 | 4.87% | |
| custom 5402410693284620911 | 11 | 4.12% | |
| custom 5217828877396629524 | 10 | 3.75% | |
| custom 5350536533550074778 | 10 | 3.75% | |
| custom 5404627854187061341 | 8 | 3.00% | |
| custom 5251317519087593206 | 7 | 2.62% | |
| custom 5217498680310913542 | 4 | 1.50% | |
| custom 5402156027493771114 | 4 | 1.50% | |
| custom 5406748545829068915 | 4 | 1.50% | |
| custom 5217864942237013869 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| custom 5307937656338932817 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| custom 5307812896128917731 | 1 | 0.375% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @diamondlerika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 December 2025 to 27 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
जीवन का दूसरा रूप
custom 525167053103958783415custom 53507245070887463398custom 52513175190875932067custom 54021560274937711144
File, posted without a caption
custom 54045686566528208558custom 52538952682643394965custom 54090803007539366624
Video, posted without a caption
custom 540669043921652069310custom 52538952682643394967custom 54046278541870613416custom 54045686566528208552
довольно часто думаю о том , как люди привыкают жить через чужие образы . иногда мне кажется , что они даже не представляют , насколько они красивые , когда просто являются собой без ролей , без масок , без постоянного наблюдения за собой со стороны в такие моменты в человеке появляется свет , который нельзя придумать или подделать. и именно его замечают чаще всего
custom 525389526826433949617custom 54066904392165206939custom 54045686566528208557custom 53507245070887463391custom 54046278541870613411custom 54090803007539366621
ver. spring. वसंत. весна пробуждает сердце 🦋🌷
custom 525389526826433949614custom 540669043921652069310custom 53507245070887463398custom 53481883976199374243custom 54045686566528208551custom 54046278541870613411
немой эксклюзив
custom 534818839761993742415custom 540241069328462091111custom 535053653355007477810custom 54090803007539366625custom 53078128961289177311
кричащая массовость
custom 534818839761993742410custom 540908030075393666210custom 52177247545044724647custom 54067485458290689154custom 53507245070887463392
✔️which 1 of them is u ? 4.ᯤ 3.᯼ 2.᯽ 1.᯾ ?
custom 535067761034084704613custom 521772475450447246412custom 521782887739662952410custom 52174986803109135424custom 52178649422370138692custom 53079376563389328172
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @diamondlerika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 791,411 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lerika W” (@diamondlerika), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diamondlerika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.