5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 689–707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 13:28
705
+3
23 Aug 2026, 10:04
702
+11
16 Aug 2026, 17:43
691
-7
8 Aug 2026, 02:19
698
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:57
698
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
60 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
27
45.0%
🔥
14
23.3%
🥰
11
18.3%
👍
6
10.0%
❤🔥
2
3.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему на Pinterest много просмотров, но нет заявок и подписчиков?
Иногда смотришь статистику: 10 000, 50 000, 100 000 просмотров. Но клиентов нет. Подписчиков почти не прибавляется. И появляется ощущение, что Pinterest просто дает красивые цифры, но не приводит людей.
На самом деле чаще всего проблема не в алгоритмах, а в самом контенте.
Первое, что стоит сделать — проанализировать свои пины.
Каждый из них должен…
🌷 С праздником, девочки!
Пусть у каждой из вас в жизни будет три очень важных вещи:
любовь, крепкое здоровье, проекты, от которых горят глаза и приятно растёт баланс на карте.
Чтобы весна началась красиво, подготовила для вас небольшой подарок.
Собрала подборку эстетичных шрифтов и цветочных фонов, которые можно использовать в:
📎 соцсетях
📎 пинах
📎 и других проектах.
Как планируете провести этот день? 🌿
Как набрать первую 1000 подписчиков (бесплатно)
Когда я создала свой первый канал, то думала, что 100 человек будет сложно набрать. Через полгода я дошла до первой серьёзной цифры и продолжаю расти на обоих каналах.
💡 Вот что я бы сказала себе в самом начале, чтобы прийти к результату быстрее:
1⃣ Упаковка профиля
Можно писать гениальные посты, но если человек заходит и не понимает, куда он попал — он уйдёт.
Назв…
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Чтобы делать для вас действительно полезный контент, который принесет результат, мне важно понимать, на каком этапе вы сейчас находитесь.
Ответьте на вопросы ниже ,чтобы поближе познакомиться ⤵️
📎 НАВИГАЦИЯ:
Добро пожаловать на канал!
Он поможет вам в продвижении на Pinterest и развитии Telegram каналов.
💌 Для связи со мной пишите: @din_design
Подборки полезных постов на канале за каждый месяц можно будет найти по хештегу #дайджест
🌸 ХЕШТЕГИ ДЛЯ ПОИСКА:
#pinterest
#telegram
#элементы
#монтаж
💜💜💜 Перемены на канале...
Изначально я создавала этот канал, чтобы показывать туториалы по монтажу. Со временем поняла, что мне хочется говорить о том, что зажигает больше всего на данный момент.
Здесь я буду делиться опытом, который помог мне выстроить поток заявок на услуги и развить первый канал до 2686 подписчиков.
Мы продолжим разбирать монтаж, но уже с фокусом на результат: продвижение в Pinterest и оформлен…
❤17🔥6👍5
Signed Диана Новикова
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @di_creates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 10 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Диана | Pinterest & TG” (@di_creates), 705 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/di_creates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
